Trump at Louisiana KAG Rally: “We Did Nothing Wrong – And They’re Doing Nothing”…He’s Right

02-corrupt-ukr-dt-600

Ladies and gentlemen, they don’t have anything. I’m trying to be very reasoned here and very serious. This is a Schiff show, and Pelosi is committed to it. And I am telling you right now that if she could find a way out of this, she would. They don’t have anything. They didn’t have anything to start with. They never had collusion with Russia. They never had any of the things they told us that Donald Trump did.

After the first day we had two witnesses and neither of the two witnesses at any time in their lives have ever had direct contact with the president of the United States. They are the star witnesses. They were the witnesses that were going to create the inertia that would lead to the public clamoring for the removal of Donald Trump.

There is no clamoring today for the removal of Donald Trump. The media doesn’t even have anything to make a bombshell out of. There literally was nothing yesterday. And I’m telling you that Schiff and Pelosi know exactly how bad this show is playing. They are not confident. They’re gonna have to make another pivot. They’re gonna have to change directions. They’re gonna have to do something if they’re going to save this because, folks, there is nothing. – Rush Limbaugh, 11/14/19

FoxNews.com reports that

Introducing a new political attack line on House Democrats amid their ongoing impeachment inquiry, President Trump forcefully declared at a rally Thursday night on friendly turf in Louisiana, “We did nothing wrong — and they’re doing nothing.”

Hours earlier, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the president of “bribery” by allegedly “threatening to withhold military aid” in exchange for an “investigation into his political rival” — signaling that Democrats were preparing to go all-in on impeachment, even as the Trump administration was touting its successes on unemployment and energy independence. The Washington Post had reported Democrats were retiring the “quid pro quo” language in exchange for “bribery” following an internal study showing the word “bribery” resonated more in battleground states.

Although the Louisiana rally ostensibly was an effort to oust the state’s governor, a Democrat, in this weekend’s election, Trump almost immediately turned his attention to the first public hearings in the impeachment inquiry earlier in the week, reading from an article from The Daily Wire’s Ryan Saavedra.

Saavedra reported that a top Ukrainian official said Thursday that U.S. Ambassador Gordon Sondland “did not link financial military assistance to a request for Ukraine to open up an investigation into former vice president and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.”

Sondland, a key witness in Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, has testified that Trump explicitly told him there were “no quid pro quos of any kind” with Ukraine, including one in which military aid would be conditioned on any politically motivated investigations. (Sondland later amended his testimony, claiming his recollection had been “refreshed,” to say that he had come to “understand” from other sources that Trump wanted Ukraine to issue an “anti-corruption statement.”)

“First it was the Russia hoax — then it was the Mueller witch hunt,” Trump said, referencing the former special counsel, to sustained boos. “We’ve been going through this from before the election took place. A bunch of bad people, and then, one of the single greatest lies ever told by anybody in this government. … and now the absolutely crazed lunatics, the Democrats, the radical left, and their media partners standing right back there, are pushing the deranged impeachment witch hunt, for doing nothing wrong. We did nothing wrong — and they’re doing nothing.”

The president argued that Democrats were holding up a vote on his newly negotiated United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement [USMCA] trade deal so they could handle impeachment-related matters. Pelosi promised Thursday that a vote on USMCA was “imminent,” but other House Democrats contradicted her later in the day, saying a vote was “close” but not quite that close.

Separately, Trump called the diplomats who have testified thus far in the impeachment probe “Never Trumpers,” echoing GOP claims that the unelected bureaucrats simply were frustrated that the president was asserting his constitutional authority over foreign policy, and sidelining their agenda.

Then, mocking House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s physical appearance, Trump remarked, “He will not make the LSU football team, and the neck is gone. He’s a bad guy, a dishonest guy.”

The president added that, but for his immunity as a congressman, Schiff, D-Calif., “should be prosecuted” for reading from a fake transcript of Trump’s call with Ukraine’s leader.

Yesterday morning, I was watching Fox News as Bill Hemmer interviewed some House Democrat. I forget his name and it doesn’t really matter because all of the House Democrats have been assimilated into the Far Left hive-mind.

Anyway, this talking mannequin starts right in with all of the Democrat Talking Points to the point where Hemmer could hardly get a word in. He finally told the esteemed public servant that it sounded like his mind was already made up to impeach.

The Democrat never gave Hemmer a direct answer.

Watching the activities of the Democratic Party, in this case those of Pelosi, Schiff, and the rest of the House Dems, I feel like I am living in Bizarro Word, where up is down, the sky is green and the grass is blue, and right is wrong and wrong is right.

How in the world can they expect to convince American Voters that they are justified in calling for the impeachment of a President who has turned around America’s economy, keeping all of his campaign promises while having to deal with the opposition party lying about him and his family as a part of a never-ending attempt to remove him from office?

Heck, Shifty Schiff can’t even keep his story straight about whether he has actually met the Whistleblower or not. First, he has and then he hasn’t.

And, every single witness, public and private, has not provided any actual proof that there was any sort of quid pro quo during the President’s phone call with the President of Ukraine. Every single witness has provided nothing but hearsay, which would be inadmissible in any courtroom in America.

And, to top it off, Wednesday’s public hearing is being compared to the horrible testimony of Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the Russia Probe’s Final hearing.

At this point, Pelosi, Schiff , and the rest of the House Democrats remind me of a singer, well past his prime, who refuses to leave the stage, even though the passage of time has left him with a two-note vocal range.

It’s time for the House Dems to leave the stage and get back to doing their job: working for the American People, instead of trying to undo our vote in the 2016 Presidential Election, simply because they did not like it.

Until He Comes,

KJ

 

 

 

Schiff Claims Not to Know the Name of the Whistleblower, Bureaucrats Think That They Run Our Foreign Policy

nn_pal_first_public_impeachment_hearings_191113_1920x1080.nbcnews-fp-1200-630

This was gonna be, this was it, finally, folks, they were gonna get rid of Trump today. This was it, the first public hearings of impeachment, and finally the American people were gonna see what an absolute disaster Donald Trump is. They haven’t seen that. They haven’t seen any evidence of anything the Democrats have been alleging. And they’re watching a couple of guys, some witnesses here they didn’t know existed, seemed very disturbed that they weren’t used and their counsel wasn’t taken, their advice wasn’t accepted. It’s exactly why Donald Trump was elected. – Rush Limbaugh, 11/13/19

FoxNews.com reports that

Lawmakers largely signaled that the hours of partisan back-and-forth did not appear to leave a singular moment etched in the public consciousness the way the Watergate proceedings or former President Clinton’s impeachment did.

“No real surprises, no bombshells,” said committee member Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah.

Taylor and Kent had defied White House instructions not to appear. Both received subpoenas.

They were among a dozen current and former officials who already testified behind closed doors. Wednesday was the start of days of public hearings expected to stretch into next week.

All day, the diplomats testified about how an ambassador was fired, the new Ukraine government was confused and they discovered an “irregular channel” — a shadow U.S. foreign policy orchestrated by the president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani which raised alarms in diplomatic and national-security circles.

For their part, Republican lawmakers observed that the president — not unelected career bureaucrats — dictated foreign policy.

At its core, the inquiry has stemmed from Trump’s July 25 phone call when he asked Zelensky for “a favor.”

The White House already has released a transcript of the call, in which the two discussed past U.S. “support” for Ukraine, as well as Ukraine’s issues with corruption. On the call, Trump asked Kiev to investigate reports that Ukraine was involved in 2016 election interference.

Later on, the president also mentioned former Vice President Joe Biden’s push to have Ukraine’s chief prosecutor fired, and suggested the country look into the matter.

The call came a day after former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s widely derided appearance on Capitol Hill appeared to leave Democrats’ hopes for impeachment dashed.

Several things struck me as I watched the epic fail that was yesterday’s public Hearing.

The first thing, which was not mentioned in the above clip of an article from FoxNews.com, was Adam Schiff telling Jim Jordan that he did not know the identity of the “Whistleblower” who started this whole fiasco, even though members of his staff supposedly met with him.

As anyone who goes on Facebook or the Internet knows, Eric Ciaramello, a CIA Bureaucrat, has been identified as the “Whistleblower”.

Rep. Schiff lies as easily as he breathes.

The next thing that struck me was the pomposity and arrogance of Ambassador Bill Taylor.

The reason that he, Kent, and their peers are providing third and fourth-hand accounts of the Ukrainian Phone Call in an attempt to damage President Trump is that they truly believe that it is THEY, a bunch of nonelected bureaucrats who set America’s Foreign Policy, and not the President of the United States of America.

After the Deep State Covert Operation known as Spygate and the “Russia Probe”, which failed miserably, we all should have seen this coming.

There is an invisible army of Deep State Bureaucrats, holdovers from the Obama Administration, who resent a “commoner”, a “Citizen Statesmen” like Donald J. Trump, being elected to the Presidency.

As the “impeachment Inquiry” Hearing showed the American Public yesterday, these popinjays do not have a grasp as to how our government works.

Perhaps American Civics Class was not taught in their schools.

President Donald J. Trump is the head of our Constitutional Republic form of government.

Every single nonelected bureaucrat serves at HIS pleasure. He does not serve at theirs.

He is responsible for American Policy, both Foreign and Domestic.

What I saw from the majority party and their witnesses in that House Intelligence Committee Public Hearing yesterday was an attempt to justify throwing out the results of the 22016 President Election over nothing but a bunch of hearsay, which would be thrown out of any court in the country.

The Democrats, being true to the animal seen on their logo, are truly making asses out of themselves.

Until He Comes,

KJ

Limbaugh: “The Model for What’s Gonna Happen This Week is the Kavanaugh Hearings”…Second Verse…Same as the First

rush-limbaugh

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1194078733579309057

FoxNews.com reports that

As House Democrats plan to hold public hearings in their Trump impeachment inquiry this week, conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh is warning supporters of the president to expect something similar to what took place last year during then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings.

“I really think that the model for what’s gonna happen this week is the Kavanaugh hearings. I mean, if you recall, here comes Christine Blasey Ford, she has her charge, and what were we told? She didn’t want to come forward,” Limbaugh said on his radio show. “Then, it didn’t have the impact they wanted, so here came Avenatti.”

The Kavanaugh confirmation process was embroiled by last-minute accusations of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford, a college professor from California who said Kavanaugh once drunkenly pinned her to a bed at a gathering and tried to remove her clothes, and Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh who said the future judge put his genitals in her face while inebriated at a dorm party. Kavanaugh denied the allegations.

Attorney Michael Avenatti’s client, Julie Swetnick, later came out as a third high-profile accuser. Swetnick claimed she was drugged and gang-raped at a house party in suburban Maryland around 1982, when Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were present. She also said she had seen Kavanaugh waiting outside a room for a “turn” with an intoxicated girl on another occasion and that he was “verbally abusive toward girls.”

Swetnick’s allegations, amplified by Avenatti during numerous cable-television appearances, helped undermine the credibility of other accusations against Kavanaugh in the minds of many Republicans once Swetnick started to backtrack on some claims.

“It was a never-ending parade for about a week and a half. As every person they brought forth to try to destroy Kavanaugh failed, there was another one waiting in the wings,” Limbaugh said. “I will guarantee you that it is the same strategery they’re gonna employ here this week, getting started with public impeachment hearings.”

“They’re gonna screw this up like they screwed up the Kavanaugh thing. They’re gonna mess it up,” Limbaugh said of the Democrats. “They want it too much, and because they want it too much, they are making tactical and strategic mistakes.”

“One of the biggest mistakes that they’re making is moving too fast,” Limbaugh added. “Impeachment, real impeachment is a much more serious thing than the ‘slam bam thank you, ma’am,’ thing that they’re trying to run here.”

Per usual, Rush is right.

The Democrat Hierarchy only has one strategy to get President Trump out of office.

And, they keep rerunning it over and over again.

Just as in the Kavanaugh Hearing, they present hearsay evidence as if were factual.

in other words,

One lies and the other swears to it.

Just as average Americans witnessed during the whole Russian Collusion Delusion fiasco, the Democrats have such a low opinion of us that they expect us to believe hearsay and outright lies to be the truth.

And, the Puppetmaster himself, George Soros, will probably once again bus in paid demonstrators to protest both within the House of Representatives and outside the doors in support of the Democrats’ Soviet-style Inquisition being held by Commissar Adam Schiff., in order to attempt to convince Americans that their fellow citizens want Trump impeached, when nothing could be further from the truth.

Don’t believe me?

Go on youtube.com and look up the Alabama vs. LSU Game played last Saturday and witness over 100,000 Americans give the President and First Lady a loud and lengthy standing ovation.

All along, the Dems have been trying to control the narrative concerning their efforts to undo the 2016 Presidential Election.

However, because of Social Media and other sources available to average Americans, the overwhelming majority of us between the coasts continue to refuse to buy what they are selling.

That is why President Trump continues to have a higher approval rate than Former President Barack Hussein Obama did at this time in his Presidency.

I continue to believe that the ongoing political shenanigans of the Democrats, brought on by their own intolerable arrogance and Trump Derangement Syndrome, is hurting them way more than it is hurting President Trump.

I also believe that Former Attorney General Matthew Whitaker was absolutely right when he said yesterday about the House’s possible passing of an Impeachment vote causing it to be taken up by the Senate that

“Not only is it dead on arrival, there’s a risk that the Senate doesn’t even take it up as it is a completely partisan exercise where [there are] only Democrat witnesses, only Democrats’ votes, and Republicans’ rights to due process and fairness are not honored,”

So, in my opinion, whether the Democrats just keep on spinning their wheels or if they actually pass an Impeachment vote and set it to the Senate, they will still lose the 2020 Presidential Election.

Simply because…President Trump has done nothing impeachable.

Until He Comes,

KJ

Sen. Rand Paul Repeats Call for Media Outlets to Reveal Ukrainian Phone Call Whistleblower’s Name

maxresdefault (11)

FoxNews.com reports that

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., appeared on “Special Report with Bret Baier” Tuesday and defended his call for media outlets to reveal the name of the Ukraine call whistleblower, adding that they should come forward.

Paul was asked to respond to a tweet by whistleblower attorney Andrew Bakhash, which stated that if Congress does not protect his client’s “anonymity” their “safety” will be jeopardized.

“I don’t wish harm on anyone. I’ve been the victim of political violence not once, but twice,” Paul said, noting he was on a Virginia baseball field in 2017 when a gunman shot Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., and was left with broken ribs after an assault by a neighbor. “So I know what political violence is all about. I don’t want that at all.”

At a rally in Lexington, Ky. Monday, Paul called on the Ukraine whistleblower to testify, saying they were biased and that Democrats are trying to hide their identity.

“I say to the media: Do your job and print his name,” Paul said, referring to the whistleblower.

On Tuesday, Paul told Baier he was confident he knew who the whistleblower was and said he could reveal the name if he wanted to.

“The statute says the inspector general can’t reveal the name. There’s nothing that prevents me from saying it now. Other than that, I want it to be more about the process and less about the person,” Paul said. “But there is no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who’s been said to be the whistleblower.”

At Monday’s rally, Paul also slammed Hunter Biden for obtaining lucrative roles with companies despite having no relevant expertise while his father, as senator and vice president, pushed legislation affecting those companies. The senator continued to focus on Biden Tuesday, saying that that it was unfair President Trump was being investigated and the Bidens were not.

Paul also put forth that he believed the whistleblower was “a material witness to the potential Biden corruption.”

“He was there under Joe Biden. He was there when Joe Biden was trying to fire the prosecutor… that was investigating Hunter Biden,” Paul claimed. “So this person was a Ukrainian expert on the desk at that time. I think he should be interviewed not as the whistleblower, but as a material witness to the Biden corruption in Ukraine.”

Baier pressed Paul on his past defense of whistleblowers like Edward Snowden.

“Yes, the whistleblower statute should protect people,” Paul said.

“Only the whistleblowers that you like?” Baier asked.

“No, they should protect him. I want Edward Snowden protected. So he’s not executed. I want him protected.

“What about this guy?” Baier asked.

“I don’t want him executed either,” Paul responded. “I don’t think he should be fired.”

I am sure that Senator Rand Paul is speaking about the individual who was revealed as the Whistleblower a week ago on RealClearInvestigations.com as Eric Ciaramella.

Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Further, Ciaramella (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

Earlier today, Fox News’ Senior Political Analyst Brit Hume tweeted the following concerning Sen. Paul’s original call for the Media to reveal the Whistleblower’s name.

He says he knows who it is. So why doesn’t he do it?

Which brings up the question, if it is Sen. Paul’s job to publicly identify Ciaramella as the Whistleblower…then what is the job of “broadcast journalists” such as yourself, Mr. Hume?

It honestly amazes me as to the number of respected individuals within the Beltway who seem to deem that following Washingtonian Status Quo Protocol to be more important than protecting the rights of a United States President who has literally brought our country back from the edge of an economic abyss.

I do not care if these “broadcast journalists” like the President or not, they should at least have the journalistic integrity (which is probably a contradiction in terms nowadays) to seek the truth…even if they themselves are violating the Protocol of the Washingtonian Elite who are eager to hold onto the Status Quo.

The Whistleblower needs to be called in to testify before the Senate and, while he sits there, one of the Senators needs to read a transcript of the Ukrainian Call, getting both his answers and the transcript of the phone call on record.

Senator Rand Paul is right.

It is time for the Republicans to launch as strong offensive in defense of President Trump, the man who made THEM relevant again.

Our country’s future depends on it.

Until He Comes,

KJ

 

Schiff Coaches Witness Not to Answer Questions From Republican House Members…Welcome to the New USSR

90 (8)

“You know, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution guarantees us due process. This president has been denied due process…. Neither the Democrats in 1973 nor the Republicans in 1998 did anything as one-sided, as secretive and destructive as what Pelosi and Schiff have done.” – Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich

FoxNews.com reports that

House Republican leaders, in a fiery news conference Tuesday, said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., prevented a witness in the latest impeachment hearing from answering certain questions from Republican members.

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told reporters that Schiff shut down a Republican line of questioning during a hearing with Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the latest current or former Trump administration official to come before Congress in relation to the impeachment probe.

“When we asked [Vindman] who he spoke to after important events in July — Adam Schiff says, ‘no, no, no, we’re not going to let him answer that question,”‘ Jordan said.

Jordan went on to say that Schiff seemed to be breaking his own rules for the hearings, implying the chairman was acting almost as a “lawyer” for Vindman.

Vindman, who serves as a director on the National Security Council (NSC), arrived Tuesday morning to testify before the House Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs committees. He expressed concern in his prepared opening statement, obtained by Fox News, over Trump’s request to have Ukraine investigate political opponents.

It also states that he does not know who the whistleblower is whose complaint spurred the beginning of the Democrats’ current impeachment inquiry and does not feel comfortable speculating about the whistleblower’s identity. The inquiry was opened after a whistleblower complaint alleged that Trump, during the July phone call, pushed Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter as military aid to the country was being withheld.

“The Democrats run out here and say, ‘ooh, the Republicans are trying to figure out who the whistleblower is,'” Jordan continued. “We’re trying to figure out who our witness list is! The resolution that the Speaker has just filed … she points this out in the resolution that this is going to go to the Judiciary Committee if in fact they push it there. There will be witnesses called. We would like to figure out who those witnesses should be.”

“I pointed out last week there 435 members of Congress … only one of them knows who the whistleblower is, more importantly, who the sources are for the whistleblower who were the basis of him filing this complaint. Now he doesn’t want anyone else to know that,” Jordan said.

Scalise then proceeded to attack the impeachment proceedings in general, using the latest GOP procedural complaint in a further attempt to discredit the Democrats’ impeachment push.

“It’s clear Pelosi needs to declare a mistrial,” Scalise said. “This has been a tainted process from the start. What happened today confirms even worse just how poorly Adam Schiff is handling this process, denying the ability for Republicans to even ask basic questions that are critical to the heart of whether or not a President of the United States is impeached.”

Well, boys and girls, there it is.

If any of you had any doubts that this was nothing but a Soviet-style tribunal with sentencing to a Siberian Gulag to follow, you should not have those doubts anymore.

For Shifty Adam Schiff to be blatantly coaching witnesses and not allow Republicans to ask question of them is as far away from the way that our Founding Fathers intended for our government to operate as the East is from the West.

I can almost understand why some Conservative Americans out there may be seeing visions of gloom and doom running through their heads.

However, now is not the time for weakness.

Now, more than ever, we need to support the President which we, the average Americans between the coasts, or “the Deplorables” as the Queen of Mean Hillary Clinton arrogantly named us, voted into office as the 45th President of the United States of America.

According to Breitbart.com,

The New York Times Upshot/Siena College Poll of voters in six key battleground states–all won by Trump in 2016–shows impeachment and removal from office is unpopular in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, North Carolina, and Arizona, as well as Wisconsin. By a ten point margin, 53 percent to 43 percent, voters in these six states oppose the impeachment and removal from office of the president.

Can you imagine what the margin is in the “Red States” in “Flyover Country”?

Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic Hierarchy get the polls.

Pelosi will not call the vote to formally impeach President Trump.

She may not even follow through on the vote Thursday. There were accounts yesterday of her walking it back.

She has nothing up her sleeve, as some pundits suggest that she may have.

Heck, she barely has anything left between the ears except for an insatiable thirst for political power.

She will not sacrifice those Democratic House members who live in Red States…not for Adam Schiff or the Squad.

And, even if all of the Dems in the House are stupid enough to vote for a formal Impeachment, Senator Mitch McConnell will not give up his entire political career simply to appease the Democrats.

Nobody of a sane mind would want that kind of legacy.

At this point, the only ones who remain gung ho about continuing the Soviet-style Tribunal in the House are Schiff and the Far Left House Dems who live in a bubble like the 6% of Americans who are Far Left Twitter Trolls living in their Moms’ Basements, eating Cheetos and trolling Trump’s Tweets because it makes them feel as if they are actually accomplishing something.

Come to think about it…

I may have just been describing the same people.

Until He Comes,

KJ

 

 

 

 

 

Pelosi Announces House Vote This Thursday “Affirming the Ongoing, Existing” [Secret] “Investigation”…Why Now?

pelosi-shuts-down-questions-on-feud-with-alexandria-ocasio-cortez

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1188972403831033856

FoxNews.com reports that

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Monday the House will vote this week on a resolution to formalize — and establish the parameters — of the Trump impeachment inquiry.

In a letter sent to Democratic House lawmakers, Pelosi, D-Calif., said the resolution “affirms the ongoing, existing investigation” and “establishes the procedure” for future investigative steps.

“We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives,” Pelosi said.

Fox News has learned the vote will take place Thursday on the House floor.

It is not an actual article of impeachment, but rather a resolution that sets process ground rules.

Republicans hit back Monday at Pelosi over the planned vote, with South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham — the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which would play a role in a Senate impeachment trial — saying, “A vote now is a bit like un-ringing a bell as House Democrats have selectively leaked information in order to damage President Trump for weeks.”

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told Fox News: “What it authorizes is that we were right. You can’t go back now.”

The White House argued Monday that the move proves Democrats have been conducting an “unauthorized” inquiry.

“We won’t be able to comment fully until we see the actual text, but Speaker Pelosi is finally admitting what the rest of America already knew – that Democrats were conducting an unauthorized impeachment proceeding, refusing to give the President due process, and their secret, shady, closed-door depositions are completely and irreversibly illegitimate,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement.

Republicans for weeks have called for a formal House vote, challenging the legitimacy of the current framework for impeachment proceedings in the absence of one. Earlier this month, the White House wrote a defiant eight-page letter to Pelosi and top Democrats saying it would not cooperate with the impeachment inquiry.

“I take pride in the fact that our vigorous response to their underhanded tactics ended up making the House Democrat position untenable,” Graham said Monday. “Today, they were forced to change course.”

Pelosi made clear in her letter that the vote is being conducted because of the Republican complaints. She accused Trump and his GOP allies of holding the position that “because the House has not taken a vote, they may simply pretend the impeachment inquiry does not exist.”

Even as she announced a formal vote, Pelosi insisted Monday that this argument “has no merit.”

“This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process rights for the president and his counsel,” she said.

Everybody was wondering what the Democrats were going to do to take the 24/7 News Cycle Spotlight away from President Trump after his brilliant strategy of a staged withdrawal in Syria led to the elimination of the leader of ISIS.

Now, we know.

Pelosi is, to paraphrase the Eagles, “a prisoner of her own device”.

I am certain that she has read Democratic Internal Polling which shows that the overwhelming majority of Americans are fed up with the Dems’ Soviet-style secret meetings, which they euphemistically have referred to as an “Impeachment Inquiry”.

At the same time, the Far Left Democrats are continuing to demand President Trump’s Impeachment for daring to beat Clinton in the 2016 Presidential Election and actually succeed in keeping his Campaign Promises, making them look like the out-of-touch anti-America losers they are.

This upcoming vote on Thursday is her way of trying to appease all of the House Dems in order to keep her position as Speaker of the House.

I guarantee you, boys and girls, there will be nothing fair and equitable proposed by the House Democrats in the vote to make their “Impeachment Inquiry” a public spectacle.

They know that if they allow the House Republicans to subpoena and call witnesses and to ask questions of theirs that the process will confirm what the majority of Americans already know: that president trump has done nothing impeachable.

Of course, there is another reason why the Democrats are now shoveling their B.S. with both hands.

The results of the investigations by Inspector General Horowitz, Attorney General William Barr, and John Dunham will all be released soon.

And, if you do not believe that the Dems are scared spitless about the possible results of those investigations, then you probably have the IQ and moral turpitude of Now-Former Rep. Katie Hill.

The Democrats desperately believe that they HAVE to somehow damage Trump in the next few months to even have a chance to win back the Presidency in 2020.

Their Primary Candidates are nothing but a bunch of lightweights touting Marxist political ideas which have failed everywhere they have been tried.

What we average Americans will witness in the following days and months is the implosion of the Democratic Party, victims of their own post-election temper tantrum which became known as Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Get your popcorn ready.

Until He Comes,

KJ

 

Fiona Hill, the “Impeachment Inquiry”, and the Eurasia Foundation…Why the Dems are Holding Closed Door Meetings

maxresdefault (10)

FoxNews.com reports that

Fiona Hill, a former top National Security Council expert on Russia, praised ousted U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch during testimony on Monday before the House Intelligence Committee.

Fox News has learned that Hill, who is testifying before the committee as part of the House’s impeachment inquiry into President Trump, had high praise for Yovanovitch during the closed-door session.

Yovanovitch, who herself testified before congressional lawmakers last Friday as part of the impeachment probe, was recalled from her ambassadorship in May by Trump, around the same time that Rudy Giuliani — the onetime New York mayor is Trump’s personal attorney and has no official role in the U.S. government — pressed Ukrainian officials to investigate corruption allegations against Democrat Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who was involved with the board of a gas company there.

The Trump administration and some Republican lawmakers have argued that Yovanovitch’s removal from the job had nothing to do with Trump’s moves to have the Bidens investigated. But The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that she was recalled from Kiev after months of complaints by Giuliani that she’d been “undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade” Ukrainian leaders to investigate Biden.

Trump, in a July 25 phone call with his counterpart in Ukraine, told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that Yovanovitch was “bad news,” according to a partial transcript released by the White House. Neither Giuliani nor Trump has publicly specified their objections to her.

Yovanovitch said in her statement Friday that she was abruptly told this spring to depart Ukraine “on the next plane.” She left her post in May and was later told the president had lost confidence in her and had been pressuring State Department officials for many months to remove her, she said.

Democrats leading the investigation said they subpoenaed Yovanovitch on Friday morning after learning late Thursday that the State Department had directed her not to appear. Trump has forbidden all government employees to cooperate; Yovanovitch remains employed by the State Department and is doing a fellowship at Georgetown University.

The House committees investigating Trump have ramped up their efforts to bring in people familiar with the Ukraine actions by Trump and Giuliani. Following Hill’s testimony on Monday, Gordon Sondland, Trump’s hand-picked ambassador to the European Union, is poised to appear on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

This follows the revelation of a cache of text messages from top envoys that provide a vivid account of their work acting as intermediaries around the time Trump urged Zelenskiy to start investigations into a company linked to Hunter Biden.

Sondland is set to tell lawmakers that he did understand the administration was offering Zelenskiy a White House visit in exchange for a public statement committing to investigations Trump wanted, according to the person, who demanded anonymity to discuss remarks not yet given.

But Sondland will say he did not know the company being talked about for an investigation, Burisma, was tied to Hunter Biden. Sondland understood the discussions about combating corruption to be part of a much broader and publicized Trump administration push that was widely shared.

Let’s look at Fiona Hill’s background, shall we?

Perhaps we can find “the ties that bind”.

Having previously served as an intelligence officer under Presidents George W. Bush & Barack Obama from 2006-2009, Hill, in April 2017, was appointed by President Donald Trump as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for European and Russian Affairs on his National Security Council staff.

Fiona Hill is on the Board of Trustees of the Eurasia Foundation.

According to sourcewatch.org,

The Eurasia Foundation (EF) is a Washington-based non-profit group that is “supported by the United States Agency for International Development and other public and private donors.”

On its website, the foundation states that “since 1992, the Eurasia Foundation has invested nearly $275 million through more than 7,700 grants and operating programs in Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.

…The Eurasia Foundation “receives majority funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through multi-year core grants. In 2004, through open competition, the Foundation received two major non-core awards from USAID to implement the Russian Independent Media Support Program and the Uzbekistan Drug Demand Reduction Program.”

In its 2002 Annual report the foundation stated that its ability to attract other funding from corporations, other foundations and institutions. “Until 2002, these multilateral and public-private partnerships were primarily focused on programs in Russia and Ukraine. They are now being expanded in response to new opportunities in other regions. For example, in the Caucasus alone, Norway, Switzerland, the Open Society Institute (George Soros), and the World Bank have provided financial support for a wide variety of grant programs.

According to their website, Eurasia.org

Our core approach is based on the following guiding principles:

Inclusiveness: EF amplifies the voices of marginalized groups, particularly women, youth, minority populations, and the economically disenfranchised. EF’s programs reach individuals and groups that reside beyond major cities and hubs and lack access to training opportunities, resources, and networks. 

Collaboration: EF is committed to building genuine and long-lasting partnerships based on trust and mutual respect. We brainstorm, design, and implement initiatives jointly with our partners on the ground and consistently seek to improve the quality of our work by listening to stakeholders, partners, and beneficiaries.

Adaptation: EF adapts its programs to the distinct contexts in which they operate. From addressing barriers to women’s workplace entry to creating platforms for youth participation, we examine individual experiences and use our in-country networks and partners to channel resources that are relevant and useful in the daily lives of our beneficiaries.

Practicality: EF supports the creation of local solutions by building leadership and subject matter expertise within communities. From entrepreneurship to women’s empowerment, EF’s training programs emphasize critical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills, reinforced with practical applications that help participants apply new skills in real-life settings.

…In 1993, EF began operations in the Eurasian countries of the former Soviet Union. A decade later, we expanded to neighboring regions and now operate programs in the Middle East and North Africa, along with China. As we diversify and expand out geographic impact, we continue to foster cooperation based on mutual respect to empower citizens to take responsibility for their own prosperity.

Of course, the Eurasia Foundation Offices are in Washington, D.C.

And as far as Former Ambassador Yovanovich is concerned, she was appointed U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in the final year of Obama’s presidency.

Can you say “Professional Bureaucrat” and “Deep State”, boys and girls?

I knew that you could.

Both these women are a part of the Washingtonian Elite, those who stride through the Halls of Power, unfettered by such concerns as having to work to be reelected, since they were never elected to their positions in the first place.

I performed all of the research above to demonstrate the layers and layers of forces behind the scenes who worked with the Washingtonian Elite to help shape a “Foreign Policy” of nation building and private investments, which is the exact opposite of the “America First!” Foreign Policy of our current President, Donald J. Trump.

The House Democrats are very aware of all these Machiavellian machinations behind the scenes, their time and money, both personal and “on the job” have been tied up in attempting to use Ukraine as a personal revenue producer, just ask the Bidens.

This Soviet-style Dog and Pony Show, which they are euphemistically calling an “Impeachment Inquiry”, even though they are excluding the Republicans from their closed door meetings and interviews, is a way of protecting their investments in the Ukraine and getting rid of “that interloper” President Trump at the same time.

“The ties that bind” the Democrats and Ukraine are a spider’s web of corruption.

This phony “Impeachment Inquiry”is nothing but a diversion to keep Americans from recognizing who the real criminals are.

Until He Comes,

KJ

 

Tlaib Reveals House Dems Talked About Jailing Trump Allies For Not Complying With House Subpoenas…Where? In Gulags?

Representative-Rashida-Tlaib-1-1200x675

The Hill.com reports that

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) revealed in a new interview that House Democrats have discussed jailing allies of the president who do not comply with congressional subpoenas, an escalation of the House’s efforts to force White House compliance with an impeachment inquiry.

Tlaib told Deadline Detroit that such an action, known as inherent contempt, would be “uncharted territory” for Congress but added that “serious conversations” about taking the step have occurred within the Democratic caucus.

“There have been actual serious conversations about what the logistics would look like … if we did have to force someone through a court order to come before the Congressional committee,” she said. “This is pretty uncharted territory for many of us and even for Congress.”

Tlaib’s comments echoed those of Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), who called for the House to do as much in a CNN interview earlier this week.

“I think it’s time to call in the sergeant-at-arms and march them off to our little jail, which we do happen to have,” Garamendi said on Wednesday.

“Let them sit there and cool off for a while,” he added.

In an inherent contempt proceeding, the House or Senate would have its sergeant-at-arms or a deputy of that person take someone into custody.

The White House has warned Congress that it will not cooperate with an impeachment probe in the Democratic-controlled House, though a State Department official defied an order to not testify this week and met with congressional investigators.

That official was the Former Ambassador to Ukraine, who is a Democrat and close friend of the Clintons.

On October 8th, President Trump’s Legal Counsel Pat A. Cipollone sent an 8-page letter to House Speak Nancy Pelosi and the Chairmen of the three House Committees who have issued subpoenas to Administration members.

In a key paragraph, Cipollone writes

Given that your inquiry lacks any legitimate constitutional foundation, any pretense of fairness, or even the most elementary due process protections, the Executive Branch cannot be expected to participate in it. Because participating in this inquiry under the current unconstitutional posture would inflict lasting institutional harm on the Executive Branch and lasting damage to the separation of powers, you have left the President no choice. Consistent with the duties of the President of the United States, and in particular his obligation to preserve the rights of future occupants of his office, President Trump cannot permit his Administration to participate in this partisan inquiry under these circumstances.

Stephen B. Presser, a Professor of Law at Northwestern University School of Law, Writes in the article “Standards for Impeachment”, found at Heritage.org that

The word “impeachment” is popularly used to indicate both the bringing of charges in the House and the Senate vote on removal from office. In the Constitution, however, the term refers only to the former. At the Convention, the delegates experimented with differing impeachment proceedings. As finally agreed, a majority vote of the House of Representatives is required to bring impeachment charges (Article I, Section 2, Clause 5), which are then tried before the Senate (Article I, Section 3, Clause 6). Two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict before an official can be removed.

In The Federalist No. 64, John Jay argued that the threat of impeachment would encourage executive officers to perform their duties with honor, and, used as a last resort, impeachment itself would be effective to remove those who betray the interests of their country. Like the limitations on the offense of treason, the Framers placed particular grounds of impeachment in the Constitution because they wished to prevent impeachment from becoming a politicized offense, as it had been in England. Nonetheless, Alexander Hamilton, in The Federalist No. 65, also warned that during impeachment proceedings, it would be difficult for Congress to act solely in the interests of the nation and resist political pressure to remove a popular official. The Framers believed that the Senate, elected by the state legislatures, would have the requisite independence needed to try impeachments. The Framers also mandated a supermajority requirement to militate against impeachments brought by the House for purely political reasons.

Boys and girls, that is exactly what we as a nation are witnessing right now.

The Democratic Party, by launching what they are euphemistically referring to as an “Impeachment Inquiry”, are attempting an end run around the United States Constitution.

These clandestine communications culminating daily in top secret closed door tribunals more closely resemble Joseph Stalin’s Great Purge from 1936-1938 in the Soviet Union when he got rid of anyone and everyone who he believe was a political dissident or simply an impediment to “The Communist Party” and his iron handed rule over the people of the Soviet Union, or proletariat than they do anything else ever seen in the history of American Politics.

By “getting rid of”, I mean Stalin either killed these “dissidents” or sent them by train to the Siberian Gulags, where they performed hard labor under horrendous living conditions until they died.

Make no mistake about it, the soul-eating hatred and absolute stark-raving madness being exhibited by the TDS-suffering Far Left House Democrats is no less horrifying and no less fascist than the actions of “Uncle Joe” Stalin or any other Marxist Leader that you can think of.

There is nothing Constitutional about what Pelosi and company are attempting to pull off here.

For them to even consider locking up Administration members without due cause is horrifying and bone-chilling, to say the least.

If they thought that they could get by with having their Deep State Minions in the Intelligence Communities grab President Trump and march him into their committee chambers to appear before them, the House Dems would do it in an instant.

Thank God that our Founders made us a Constitutional Republic with 3 Branches of government.

They only thing that is stopping them is that they know that average Americans would not stand for it.

By now, I am sure that you are asking “So, why doesn’t Pelosi just “call the vote” and get the Impeachment, which she claims now to want, started?”

Simple.

With all of this mess they started, after almost 3 years of pontificating and bloviating, the Democrats still have nothing to impeach President Trump on.

And, if they try it, they will lose control of the House of Representatives and the President will be re-elected in an even bigger landslide than is already coming.

The House Dems’ Soviet Dog and Pony Show is not impressing average Americans and is digging them a political hole which eventually is going to send them the way of the Whigs.

And, it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch.

Until He Comes,

KJ

Trump at Lake Charles MAGA Rally: Dems are “Pursuing an Illegal B******t Impeachment”! Why He’s Right

Screen-Shot-2019-10-11-at-8.07.20-PM-1

FoxNews.com reports that

President Trump slammed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., at his second campaign rally in as many nights Friday, saying “Nancy Pelosi hates the United States of America.”

Trump ridiculed the ongoing impeachment inquiry spearheaded by House Democrats, who he called “scammers and con artists,”

“They know they can’t win an election so they’re pursuing an illegal unconstitutional b—s— impeachment,” the president roared before a packed arena in Lake Charles, La.

Trump also attacked Joe and Hunter Biden over their Ukrainian business dealings for the second night in a row, accusing the media of covering up potential Biden corruption and complaining that if any of his children were similarly accused, the media wouldn’t call the allegations unsubstantiated — “They would be saying, ‘Where’s the nearest cell?'”

The president decried the “rage-filled Democrat party that has gone completely insane” accusing them of waging a “nonstop battle” to “overthrow” his presidency.

Trump also mocked ex-FBI officials and lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page again saying “these people are corrupt. These people are disgusting.”

“This is the witch hunt,” he said. “They’ve been trying to stop us for three years with a lot of crap.”

Trump’s appearance in Louisiana was scheduled to help rally Republican voters against the state’s Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards.

“Tomorrow you will head to the polls and vote to replace a liberal Democrat who has sold you out, John Bel Edwards, with a great Republican governor,” Trump said in his remarks, encouraging Louisianians to get to the polls before Saturday night’s big college football matchup between unbeaten Louisiana State University and the University of Florida or else they would feel guilty and “it will ruin your entire afternoon.”

The president was joined onstage by both U.S. Rep. Ralph Abraham and businessman Eddie Rispone, but did not endorse either candidate in order to maximize chances that Edwards will fall below the 50 percent vote threshold needed to avoid a runoff in Saturday’s gubernatorial “jungle primary,” in which all the candidates appear on a single ballot.

“You’re not allowed to hit your Republican opponent, you’re only allowed to hit John Bel Edwards,” Trump said, extending an olive branch between the two GOP candidates, who have been at loggerheads in the race to the governor’s mansion.

The president’s trip to Louisiana comes one day after another fiery rally in Minneapolis, Minn., during which Trump also slammed House Democrats and their impeachment inquiry against him.

The president touted the country’s economy and boasted about the truce reached with China just hours before he landed in Louisiana, which stipulates that China will purchase up to $50 billion worth of agricultural goods from American farmers and also will postpone tariffs on Chinese goods that were originally set to take effect next week.

“I just made a great China deal today for energy, for the farmers, for the banks… I want to tell you, I got China to order a lot!”

He did not mention the growing issue of censorship in the U.S. over ongoing pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

“We’ve ended the war on American energy, and with your help, right here in Louisiana, the United States is now the number one producer of oil and natural gas anywhere on the planet!” Trump also boasted.

He also slammed Edwards for the state’s tax hike, which was passed with Republican support.

“You are going to fire your Democratic governor who has done a lousy job and send a great Republican to the governor’s mansion,” Trump said.

Other top Republicans, including Vice President Pence and Donald Trump Jr., have paid visits to the state, which Trump won by nearly 20 percentage points in 2016.

Neither Abraham nor Rispone has been able to break away as the top competitor, even as Rispone poured $11 million of his own personal wealth into the campaign. Party leaders’ efforts to keep the men from fighting each other have failed, raising concerns the backbiting could wound both GOP contenders and help Edwards. Republicans blame attacks among their own candidates for helping to elect Edwards four years ago.

Edwards isn’t the type of liberal, anti-Trump Democrat with whom the president usually clashes.

Louisiana’s governor is an anti-abortion, pro-gun West Point graduate who avoids criticizing Trump, talks about his strong rapport with the White House and calls the impeachment inquiry a distraction for Washington.

“He’s 100 percent going to drop the second Amendment … John Bel Edwards will not protect your second amendment,” Trump told the crowd.

While Edwards’ efforts to keep the president at bay in the governor’s race have been unsuccessful, the Democratic incumbent isn’t complaining about the rallies. Instead, he has downplayed them, calling it unsurprising that Trump backs members of his own party in the “hyperpartisan” environment of Washington. He said he would continue to “work well” with the president and focus on his own, bipartisan approach to governing.

“When my opponents realized just how much support my campaign had from the people of Louisiana, they started calling in help from forces in Washington, D.C.,” Edwards said. “My opponents are obsessed with political partisanship because the only way they think they can win is to divide the state of Louisiana.”

Republicans nationally have targeted Edwards for ouster since his longshot election victory four years ago. But work to unify around one major contender failed, with the state’s top-tier, well-known GOP officials passing on the race.

Trump was also joined on stage by Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., who said: “I told you, Donald J. Trump loves Louisiana like the devil loves sin.”

He also invited the Eastbank All-Stars, the Little League baseball championship team that joined him at the White House earlier in the day and then flew on Air Force One to the rally, to come on stage in Louisiana.

President Trump is amazing, isn’t he?

He continues his tireless work for our country and goes out on the stump for Republican Candidates from coast to coast.

All while dealing with a Democratic Party who has literally gone insane after throwing a nonstop national temper tantrum since the night of November 8, 2016

The very fact that a Deep State Operation involving members of a previous Administration, including members of the DOJ and FBI, designed to prevent him from becoming the Republican Presidential Candidate and later, attempting to frame him for “colluding with the Russian failed miserably, has driven the Democrat Hierarchy, including Nancy Pelosi, absolutely stark raving mad.

The House Democrats have thrown all pretense to the wind and are now holding secret meetings and interviews just like the days of the Politboro in the Soviet Union where innocent people were pronounced guilty without a trial and sentenced to hard labor in the Siberian Gulags.

The President was exactly right to call this Marxist-style mockery a “b******t impeachment.”

And he was exactly right about San Fran Nan Pelosi, also.

She could care less about the United States of America and what Americans want.

What we are witnessing, boys and girls, is sedition, a planned coup d’etat against Trump which, after going awry, has morphed into a “Star Chamber”, where the House Democrats are playing judge, jury, and executioner.

Stalin and Breshnev would be proud of Pelosi, Nadler, and Schiff.

Just like President Trump and the rest of my fellow “Deplorables”, I think those Dems stink on ice.

Ending on a positive note,

Today was a day that the players and coaches of the Eastbanks All-Stars will remember the rest of their lives.

And, rightfully so.

They got to ride in Air Force One with a GENUINE AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

God bless him for his kindness to the Eastbank All-Stars and for his tireless work toward

Making America Great Again!

Until He Comes,

KJ

If Dems Move to Impeach, Graham Will Expose Anonymous Whistleblowers…Is Trump Being “Kavanaughed”?

ISRAEL-US-DIPLOMACY

FoxNews.com reports that

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., vowed to expose the anonymous whistleblowers against President Trump if Democrats move forward with impeachment; at the same time, he warned against Trump having China pursue an investigation of Joe Biden.

A second unidentified whistleblower was confirmed Sunday morning, reportedly with firsthand information to support some of the allegations another whistleblower made in a complaint filed in August regarding a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Graham said that if Democrats follow through on their desire to impeach Trump, he will make sure that the whistleblowers will have to come forward and testify.

“Here’s what’s going to happen: if the whistleblowers’ allegations are turned into an impeachment article it’s imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath, and cross-examined,” Graham told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” promising that “if that doesn’t happen in the House, I’ll make sure it happens in the Senate.”

Graham pointed to the need for Trump to be able to confront his accusers, saying, “There can be no valid impeachment process unless the president can confront the witnesses against him.”

The complaint accused Trump of using military aid as leverage to pressure Ukraine into investigating Hunter Biden’s business dealings with Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings, and former Vice President Joe Biden’s efforts to have Ukraine fire the prosecutor who was investigating the firm.

“I think it’s ridiculous to say the president did something wrong based on the phone call,” Graham said, adding that Trump did not suggest any quid pro quo tying the military aid to the Biden investigation, which was being spearheaded by Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Giuliani, meanwhile, has been vocal about alleged wrongdoing on the part of the Bidens in both Ukraine and China. The former New York City mayor claims that Hunter Biden received money from both Ukraine and China as part of a “pay for play” scheme to curry favor with the then-vice president. Trump has suggested that China should investigate Biden for the alleged corruption. Graham, however, advised against such a thing.

“I think that’s a bad idea,” Graham told host Maria Bartiromo. “I don’t trust anything coming out of China against Biden, Trump, me or you.”

That does not mean he thinks the Bidens should get a pass.

“Somebody needs to look at the Bidens, whether or not they violated the law,” he said. “They sure as hell looked at the Trumps. Somebody needs to look at the Bidens.”

Preach, Lindsey, preach.

Senator Graham just nailed the reason why the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi has not called for a formal Impeachment Inquiry or for a vote to begin the Impeachment Process.

In either case, it would formalize proceedings, allowing the republicans to ask questions of the Democrats’ witnesses and to call their own.

And, if both these “whistleblowers” are nothing but disgruntled CIA Agents, i.e., Deep State Operatives loyal to John Brennan and the previous Administration, that would be revealed on the floor of the House for the entire world to see.

By the way, does this sudden discovery of “multiple anonymous witnesses” give you a feeling of deja vu, boys and girls?

It should.

It’s the same sort of strategy which the Democrats used to attack Judge Kavanaugh with in order to try to keep him from becoming a Supreme Court Associate Justice.

Just as the Dems were saying that Americans MUST believe Blasey Ford and the anonymous “corroborating witnesses” who were attempting to pile on Judge Kavanaugh because “they were so BRAVE” to come forth, so are they vouching for the veracity of these anonymous whistleblowers who, as this “strategy” plays out again, will turn out to not know a cotton-pickin’ thing.

The Democrats seem to only know one strategy, which is to take out anyone who dares to foil their plans to turn America into a Third World Socialist “Paradise”, through the use of lies, falsehoods, and intimidation.

Then they have the nerve to act incredulous when their target fights back, as President Trump is doing.

I say, more power to him.

The economy is growing. Americans are working. Minority Unemployment is experiencing record lows.

America is back, Baby!!!

And, the Democrats can’t stand it.

That is why they are trying to remove him from office.

He, like the Americans who were represented by a sea of red on the 2016 Electoral Map, believes in the America of our Fathers.

The Democrats do not.

They wish to install a system of government which will control each and every one of us, all the days of our lives.

The Impeachment of President Trump is meant to be an object lesson to all of us average Americans between the coasts, whom the Democrats identify as “Deplorables”.

Just as they underestimated average Americans in 2016, so are they underestimating us now.

Like the Whigs, the Democrats are sentencing themselves to become just another footnote in history.

Until He Comes,

KJ