Suffocating Dissent

Who said the following?

Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism.

The news is not a commercial product. It is a public good, necessary for a self-governing society. Once we accept this, we can talk about the kind of media policies and subsidies we want.

In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick-by-brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.

Was it  a) Joe Stalin b) Mao Zedong c) Hugo “Friend to the Stars” Chavez?

These statements come from the warped mind of Robert McChesney, self-professed neomarxist media scholar and the founder of the lobbying group and think tank Free Press.

These statements should scare the heck out of you.   I know that they seem like the garbage that you can hear out of the mouth of any Leftist professor in universities across America.  However,  McChesney has the ear of the president and his views are having a direct effect on the Obama administrations media policies. 

You don’t have to believe me.   Take a look at a recent report from the Federal Trade Commission entitled, “Potential Policy Recommendations to Support the Reinvention of Journalism.”  A lot of the ideas found within the document sound very familiar.

According to Adam Theirer, president of the Progress and Freedom Foundation:

I certainly think Free Press is making headway with the FTC.  They’ve been filing extensive comments with the FTC and they’ve gotten face-time at the FTC workshops. And if you look at the 47-page discussion document that the FTC just released, many of those ideas were borrowed directly from McChesney or Free Press.

Check out these tremendous ideas (and tremble):

  • The establishment of a “‘journalism’ division of AmeriCorps” to “ensure that young people who love journalism will stay in the field”
  • Providing “a tax credit to news organizations for every journalist they employ”
  • “Establishing citizenship news vouchers”
  • “Increasing postal subsidies for newspapers and periodicals”
  • A tax on news aggregators, or even a policy to make news aggregation sites, like the Drudge Report, illegal
  • The allocation of roughly $35 billion in public news subsidies
  • A five percent tax on consumer electronics
  • A ISP cell phone tax
  • A revision of the tax code to allow for more nonprofit media

McChesney’s contributions to the FTC document might be a surprise to those who thought Free Press was only involved in pushing internet regulation known as net neutrality. However, Free Press has been working towards a much larger goal since its creation in 2002.

A telecommunications expert with intimate knowledge of the group said:

Free Press hasn’t always been about net neutrality.  It’s just a diversion that’s been really lucrative for them. What they’re really about is having an order of magnitude more media under government control and implementing rules that disadvantage for-profit media.

The good news is that Federal Trade Commission (FTC) leaders are now attempting to distance themselves from these proposals.  Funds collected through the proposed taxes would be redistributed to traditional media outlets.

Concerning the 5 % Device Tax,  FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz torpedoed it in testimony Wednesday before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, saying:

I think that’s a terrible idea.

The backpedaling is not surprising, as this  proposal  is as unpopular among the masses as they come in Washington.  A poll released Tuesday by Rasmussen Reports found that three out of four of those surveyed opposed taxing gadgets. About the same amount opposed the Drudge Tax.

Per pollster Scott Rasmussen:

The American people have absolutely no interest in taxing new media or consumer electronics to prop up an industry that’s clearly on its way out. 

Trial balloons are nothing new from this administration (remember the proposal to make veterans pay for their medical benefits?).   When the administration and Congress want to enact a politically controversial policy, they often use an independent federal agency whose leadership need not face the wrath of voters. the agency then presents  potentially unpopular ideas are presented first by staff so commissioners can get rid of the plans that have no chance of being implemented.

Passing the buck is S.O.P. in the Federal Government. The FTC claims that the proposals released last month were suggested by public comments (i.e., Far Left loons like McChesney, Soros, etc.). In fact, the agency’s Federal Register announcement for the proceeding questioned the professionalism of news-aggregator websites that “do not pay for content”.  This document was filed long before public hearings were held.

The report’s views also happen to match positions that Leibowitz has held in the past.  Before joining the FTC, he was vice president of the Motion Picture Association of America, an organization that defends a leftist view of copyright law in order to perpetuate Hollywood’s increasingly obsolete business model.  At a December workshop, Mr. Leibowitz kvetched that online news readers get a “free ride instead of paying the full value – or in fact paying anything – for what they’re consuming.”

Even though they’ve retreated on the electronics tax, Mr. Leibowitz and his staff have not abandoned their opinion that the problems facing journalism can and should be solved by government, even if they are not sure of the exact form this control would take.  The Obama administration has already showed that it is more than happy to completely ignore the majority of public opinion in order to expand government involvement in areas such as health care. Therefore, if there are any left in Congress who actually care about preserving our freedoms, they must take action to stop this administration’s latest trial balloon.  Government subsidies will destroy journalism.

Uncle Joe Stalin would be so proud.

Sources:  merriam-webster.com, dailycaller.com, drudgereport.com, washingtontimes.com
 

Betraying a Friend

On Tuesday afternoon, March 23rd, 2010, something happened at the White House that has never happened before in American history. A sitting President walked out of a meeting with the Prime Minister of one of our closest allies, foregoing the traditional photo-op, press conference, and evening meal together.

After failing to extract a written promise of concessions on settlements, Obama walked out of his meeting with Netanyahu but invited him to stay at the White House, consult with advisers and “let me know if there is anything new”, a U.S. congressman, who spoke to the Prime Minister, said.

On April 27th, I reported that:

US President Barack Obama laid a key plank of his strategy to mend ties with the Islamic world by hosting a summit to boost economic development in Muslim nations.

In a step the White House hopes will help shift relations beyond decades of talk about terrorism and conflict, Obama brought entrepreneurs from 50 countries to Washington for two days to spur economic ties.

The president pledged to host the meeting in a landmark speech in Cairo last June, when he also called for a ‘new beginning’ to relations between the United States and the Muslim world.

Do you see a pattern developing here?

It’s hard to believe that it’s only been a little more than a week since Israel’s  May 31 raid on a flotilla hoping to break the blockade on Gaza. Nine men in the flotilla were killed, including eight Turks and a Turkish American. Israel says its soldiers opened fire only after being attacked while the flotilla activists claimed Israel used unnecessary violence after they were attacked with pipes and knives.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been scheduled to visit the White House June 1 but canceled the visit to provide leadership to Israel during the flotilla aftermath.  His visit had to be rescheduled, and White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Wednesday it could happen by the end of this month.

Meanwhile, yesterday, Scooter called for sharply limiting Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip and the White House announced a $400 million aid package for Gaza and the West Bank.

“The situation in Gaza is unsustainable,” Obama said during his scheduled meeting and photo-op with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Oval Office.  He said the attention of the world is on the problem because of the “tragedy” of the Israeli raid that killed nine people (who happened to be young men armed with pipes and knives) trying to bring in supplies.

Obama called for severely restricting Israel’s broad blockade on goods entering the Gaza Strip so that arms are kept out, but not items needed for the Palestinians’ daily life and economic development.  Uh huh.

Per Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him):

The key here is making sure that Israel’s security needs are met but that the needs of people in Gaza are also met.  So if we can get a new conceptual framework … it seems to me that we should be able to take what has been a tragedy and turn it into an opportunity to create a situation where lives in Gaza are actually, directly improved.

The approach marked a shift in the  U.S. position.  However, it did not meet international calls for an end to the 3-year-old blockade. Israel was forced to create the blockage in order to keep arms away from the barbaric Hamas movement that controls Gaza.  Of course, critics say the blockade is ineffective and causes undue suffering.  Scooter announced that the U.S. would discuss the new approach with European leaders, Egypt, Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

Abbas welcomed the $400 million aid package, which is supposed to go for things like creating jobs and improving access to drinking water, but wants further actions against the blockade.  Of course.

The figurehead, whose actually has very little influence in the area, since his forces were routed when Hamas took over in 2007, said:

We also see the need to lift the Israeli siege of the Palestinian people, the need to open all the crossings and the need to let building material and humanitarian material and all the necessities go into the Palestinian people. 

 He and his more moderate Fatah movement hold the West Bank, the other Palestinian territory.

Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, said Israel was open to suggestions that would address the needs of the Palestinian people along with Israel’s security requirements, but he defended the blockade as “essential for not only Israel’s security, Egypt’s security, but it’s essential for the peace process.”

Per Ambassador Oren, letting building materials through the blockade is not a good idea:

We know that Hamas is going to take these materials and not use them to build schools, they’re going to use them to build military bunkers. So we are reluctant to let those things through.

Wednesday’s meeting between Obama and Abbas came as Israel announced it would allow potato chips, cookies, spices and other previously banned food items into the Gaza Strip.

 Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said the gesture was not worth commenting on.

The Abbas visit had been expected to focus on peace talks between the Israelis and Palestinians,a shuttle diplomacy effort now proceeding under the guidance of U.S. envoy George Mitchell.  The U.S. hopes that it will lead to direct talks.

Obama said he anticipated significant progress could be made, despite the uproar over the flotilla raid, if both sides try to ensure a conducive environment.  Obama claimed  that for the Israelis, it means curbing settlement activity and recognizing progress on security on the part of the Palestinians.

Scooter said:

On the Palestinian side, I was very frank with President Abbas that we have to continue to make more progress on both security as well as incitement issues. 

Nudge nudge.  Wink wink.

Abbas responded:

I say in front of you, Mr. President, that we have nothing to do with incitement against Israel, and we’re not doing that.  What we care about is to live in coexistence with Israel in order to bring about the independent Palestinian state that will live side by side with Israel in peace and stability.

Just give us the land belonging to the Joooooos and everything will be okey dokey.

P.J. Crowley, State Department spokesman, said the $400 million aid package represented specific allocations of money that had already been budgeted for the Palestinians, some of it promised by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton last year, when  The Queen of Smart Power! made a $900 million commitment.  Projects announced Wednesday included $240 million for mortgage assistance in the West Bank and $10 million to build five new schools in Gaza. 

Isn’t that…special.

When Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmm mmmm) was The Democratic candidate for President, newsmax.com supplied us with the following information:

…Obama has numerous donors who have contributed well over the $4,600 federal election limit.

Many of these donors have never been contacted by the Obama campaign to refund the excess amounts to them.

And more than 37,000 Obama donations appear to be conversions of foreign currency.

According to a Newsmax analysis of the Obama campaign data before the latest figures were released, potential foreign currency donations could range anywhere from $12.8 million to a stunning $63 million in all. With the addition of $150 million raised in September, this amount could be much more.

From the time he left that Madrassa, err, Private School for wealthy families in Indonesia, to his 20 years in Trinity Church under Rev. Jeremiah Wright, to his speech in Cairo, Egypt, to this very moment, there has been no doubt as to where this man’s sympathies lie in the Middle East conflict.

They definitely are not with our friend. 

Sources:  dailycaller.com, newsmax.com, drudgereport.com

The Prez, Petroleum, and Palin

I have some good news and some bad news for you.  The good news is that the latest attempt to cap the broken well, one mile down in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, seems to be working.  The bad news is that the Feds said Tuesday that BP  was collecting so much oil that it didn’t have a big enough boat to hold it.

President Barack Obama told NBC News, in an interview aired Tuesday, that he would have fired BP CEO Tony Hayward by now if he worked for him. Brave words.  He hasn’t even had a face-to-face discussion with him yet.

Because Democratic publicity hounds such as strategist and CNN pundit James Carville began yipping at Scooter’s heels for not being tough enough on BP, he is scolding BP, warning the company last week against “nickel and diming” Gulf residents, and appearing in a bunch of televised interviews this week to let American know that he is “furious” about the crisis. Furthermore, the White House is now backing a move to lift all caps on liability oil companies could face for spilling crude.

All this “frustration” is going to be transferred to the oil companies and their consumers in the form of new regulations like the ones revealed Tuesday by the Obama administration as the prerequisite for companies to resume offshore drilling in waters shallower than 500 feet.

The new rules call for more extensive inspection and certification of blowout preventers, the huge devices that are supposed to stop the flow of oil from a damaged well.  A failed blowout preventer is one of the problems in the huge BP spill.

Congressional Democrats met Tuesday, in order to look like they were doing something.  When San Fran Nan came out of the meeting, she declared that they were determined: 

to exploit and enforce the laws that are there; change them if necessary; and pass others to make us stronger in terms of protecting the interest of the taxpayer, the economy, the ecology, the quality of life of the region.

Woo Hoo.  I know the fishermen feel better already.

The industry, and the rest of Americans, could also pay in the form of higher taxes. Senate legislation would increase a per-barrel tax paid by oil companies to 41 cents, up from 8 cents, raising $14 billion over 10 years. The tax is alledgedly in support of a government fund created in 1990 after the Exxon Valdez spill to help fund cleanup projects.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said Tuesday that Democrats were raiding the fund to pay for programs not related to oil-spill cleanup.  New revenue raised by the levy “ought to be used to clean up spills,” he said.

Lost or delayed opportunities to drill will also cost the oil companies. Obama proclaimed a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling and cancelled the sale of oil leases off the East Coast and Alaska. He  had also halted shallow-water drilling pending the issuance of the new rules. Those rules could keep rigs off the water for more days or weeks.

The new rules issued Tuesday require a company’s CEO to personally certify that the operator has complied with all regulations, that drilling equipment has been tested and that personnel are properly trained, among other things. They also call for independent verification for a number of systems, particularly blowout preventers.

The shallow part of the Gulf of Mexico provides about 55% of all natural gas produced in the Gulf and about 20% of all the oil. The deepwater region accounts for more than 80% of the oil produced in the Gulf.

The rest of the world has not issued any regulatory clampdowns like those from this administration…yet.

Yesterday, Norway proclaimed that it was “not appropriate” to allow new deepwater drilling until the Deepwater Horizon incident had been fully investigated, but they also turned around and said they would go ahead with plans to award new exploration licenses in their territorial waters next year.

The U.K. said Tuesday it wouldn’t halt drilling in one of the most promising deepwater sites in Europe, the West of Shetland area north of Scotland. Instead, Officials announced plans to double the number of annual environmental inspections of drilling rigs.

Meanwhile, back in the Gulf, BP’s costs for the disaster are growing quickly. Late Tuesday, the company said it would donate net revenue from the oil it is collecting from the well to organizations working on the Gulf cleanup effort.  BP still faces pressure from the Obama Administration to pay out more money, faster, and to move more rapidly to capture oil from its well.

BP is collecting about 15,000 barrels a day from the well now and plans in the next week or so to expand its oil-containment effort by another 5,000 barrels a day, through the use of another vessel already onsite.  They are also bringing in storage vessels from around the globe, including a tanker from the North Sea.

A new estimate of how much oil is flowing from the well is expected to be released from a group of scientists working for the U.S. government later this week.  The flow rate is now being analyzed by scientists looking at  high-resolution video of the leak using a method called particle image velocimetry.  PIV involves observing separate features in the flow from one frame to the next to measure the velocity of the fluid.

While the administration and Congress are in the process of burdening the oil industry with new regulations and taxes to the detriment of them and the American consumer, and Barack Obama is trying to figure out whose *** (expletive deleted) to kick, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has some advice for POTUS:

Please, sir, for the sake of the Gulf residents, reach out to experts who have experience holding oil companies accountable. I suggested a few weeks ago that you start with Alaska’s Department of Natural Resources, led by Commissioner Tom Irwin. Having worked with Tom and his DNR and AGIA team led by Marty Rutherford, I can vouch for their integrity and expertise in dealing with Big Oil and overseeing its developments. We’ve all lived and worked through the Exxon-Valdez spill. They can help you. Give them a call. Or, what the heck, give me a call.

And,[finally], Mr. President, please do not punish the American public with any new energy tax in response to this tragedy. Just because BP and federal regulators screwed up that doesn’t mean the rest of us should get punished with higher taxes at the pump and attached to everything petroleum products touch.

This sounds like very common sense advice to me.  Unfortunately, this over-his-head president, his Chicago-thug  administration, and our Beltway Elite Congress are as far removed from common sense as a drunk is to sobriety.  Speaking of which, they may drive all of America to drink before this regime is out of power.

Sources:  wsj.com, facebook.com

Let Them Eat Arugula!

There has been something that has been tugging at my soul since 52% of  the voting public foisted the man-made disaster named Barack Hussein Obama(mm mmm mmmm) upon us.

There is a palpatable sense of aloofness and undeserved conceit that seems to emanate from him like radiation from a tanning bed.

Remember this quote from a San Francisco Fund Raiser in April of 2008?

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them.  And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

On October 28., 2008, this appeared in Jake Tapper’s Blog:

The respected Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports that according to a “senior Israeli government source, the reports reaching Israel indicate that Sarkozy views the Democratic candidate’s stance on Iran as ‘utterly immature’ and comprised of ‘formulations empty of all content.'”

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., met with Sarkozy in July and they are said to have discussed Iran at length.

French authorities are said to be concerned that the international community doesn’t take the Iranian threat seriously enough. French intelligence has concluded that Iran has already obtained up to 40% of the enriched uranium it needs for a bomb, the newspaper reports, and will have obtained the rest next summer.

In April 2009,  in a meeting with American CEOs of American banks, when the CEOs tried to explain that the nature, complexities, and competition of the finance and banking industries required that they continue retention bonuses for their employees, Scooter  interrupted them and said:

Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn’t buying that. My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.

Swapan Dasgupta, writing for the Daily Pioneer, tells us that in the past few months, the international grapevine has been abuzz with stories of a new, abrasive style of diplomacy that has become the style of the Obama Administration.  Smart Power!

This departure from diplomacy would have been understandable if they had only done it in dealing with countries such as Iran and Venezuela that take cheap shots at the US. Instead, Scooter appears to have reserved his Don Rickles impersonation for our allies.

I know you’re thinking that I’m speaking of the way he’s treated Bibi Netanyahu.  It’s not just Israel.   Obama made a sudden visit to Kabul on March 28, partly for a photo-op with the American forces stationed there and partly to meet with President Hamid Karzai.    Obama’s handlers carefully sent out the news that Obama read Karzai the riot act.  Obama told him that the US found his style of governance wasn’t cutting it and the levels of corruption would not be tolerated.  He was told to shape up or ship out.

Obama’s nagging hasn’t gone over well in Afghanistan. Karzai was offended by Obama’s attitude and has lashed out at the West. He has  subsequently sought to befriend Iran, caution the US against any unilateral offensive on Kandahar and even let it be known that sheer exasperation with American arrogance may drive him into the arms of the Taliban.  Obama responded by questioning Karzai’s mental stability and inferring that he is suffering the effects of hallucinatory drugs.  Talk about a relationship going from bad to worse.

The latest example of  Obama’s unbridled arrogance was, of course, last night on NBC’s Nightly News, when he tried to talk tough about the Gulf Coast Crisis:

I was down there a month ago, before most of these talkin’ heads were even paying attention to the gulf. A month ago I was meeting with fishermen down there, standin’ in the rain talking about what a potential crisis this could be. and I don’t sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar, we talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose *** (expletive deleted) to kick.

I find Obama’s imperious attitude hauntingly familiar.

Marie Antoinette was the Queen of France during the French Revolution. She has gone down in history as the arrogant monarch who, when told the peasants were starving because they had no bread, said “let them eat cake.”  Marie was despised by the French citizenry for her foreign birth and extravagant lifestyle.   While today,  most scholars dismiss the quote as phony revolutionary propaganda, Marie was truthfully known to have been an out-of-control spender as a young queen. The daughter of Francis I and Maria Theresa, Emperor and Empress of the Holy Roman Empire, Marie left Austria for France in 1770 to marry the prince of France. In 1774 the prince became King Louis XVI and Marie became queen.  The king and queen tried to flee as revolution swept Paris in 1789, but were captured.    Marie and Louis XVI were kept as prisoners at the palace at Tuileries, while the revolutionaries tried to figure out what kind of government France was going to have.  They were arrested and charged with treason in 1792.  Louis was beheaded on 21 January 1793 and Marie was beheaded months later, on 16 October 1793.

In 2008, Obama was on a Campaign appearance in Iowa to speak about rural issues and, in an attempt to fake sympathy for farmers and their economic struggles, he said, anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula?  You could have heard a pin drop.  Scooter had no more knowledge of the daily lives of those Average Americans than a penguin would know how to survive in a desert.  He is as out-of-place as an American President as Marie Antoinette was as the Queen of France.

Let them eat arugula!

Sources:  dailypioneer.com, pajamasmedia.com, answers com, glennbeck.com, abcnews.com

Do as I Say. Not as I Do.

Monday evening, it was revealed via NBC’s Nightly News, that the President of the United States still knows how to speak like a wannabe Chicago street thug.  He spoke this way because the White House is desperately trying to rewrite history in order to support the claim that they have been on top of the Gulf Coast Crisis since Day One.  They are trying to change the public’s perception of little Scooter Obama as Barney Fife to Rambo.

Per the POTUS:

I was down there a month ago, before most of these talkin’ heads were even paying attention to the gulf. A month ago I was meeting with fishermen down there, standin’ in the rain talking about what a potential crisis this could be. and I don’t sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar, we talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose *** (expletive deleted) to kick.

Classy, isn’t he?

In case you are tempted to buy Scooter’s phony outrage at BP and its’ gulf oil spill, here’s a story that he does not want you to know.   Most of you know that BP was a significant contributor to the record $750-million war chest of Barack Obama’s 2007-08 campaign.

Now, details have surfaced of a BP connection to Rahm Emanuel, the Chicago mayoral wannabe, current Obama chief of staff, ex-representative, ex-Clinton money man, ex-Windy City political machine go-fer and shower stalker.

Shortly after Obama’s coronation,  word got out that, as a House member, Emanuel had lived the last five years rent-free in a D.C. apartment of Democratic colleague Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut and her husband, Stanley Greenberg.  This raised a few eyebrows.

Greenberg’s consulting firm just happened to be one of the designers of BP’s  rebranding into a green petroleum company, down to green signs and the slogan “Beyond Petroleum.”

Greenberg’s company is also closely tied to another Democratic outfit — GCS, named after the last initials of Greenberg, James Carville, another Clinton advisor, and Bob Shrum, John Kerry’s 2004 campaign manager.

GCS received hundreds of thousands of dollars in political polling contracts in recent years from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Guess who was the chairman of that Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dispensing those huge polling contracts to his kindly rent-free landlord?

Scooter, methinks thou dost protest too much.

Last night, President Barack Obama told high school graduates in Michigan not to make excuses, and to take responsibility for failures as well as successes.

At the Kalamazoo Central High School Commencement Exercises, Scooter said that it’s easy to blame others when problems arise.

We see it every day out in Washington, with folks calling each other names and making all sorts of accusations on TV.

He said the high school kids can and have done better than that.

The 1,700-student high school in southwest Michigan won the national Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge.  The White House made the final selection among three finalists picked through public voting on the schools’ videos and essays.

The administration cited Kalamazoo Central’s 80 percent-plus graduation rate, improvements in academic performance and a culturally rich (Liberal) curriculum.

Obama is an expert as to how easy it is to blame others.

July 29, 2008 – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama yesterday blamed “irresponsible decisions” by the Bush administration and Wall Street for the country’s economic woes as government officials said the budget deficit would soar to record heights next year.

January 25, 2010 – In the first presidential comments on the Massachusetts race last week, Obama blamed Bush right away in an interview with ABC News.

Obama said:

The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office . People are angry, and they’re frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years. 

Scooter and his minions blamed the Bush years later that week as they unveiled new proposals for regulating Wall Street. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Thursday the country can’t go without stiff financial regulation, or else “we get into the same type of situation that we found ourselves in in September of 2008.” 

Obama, in a Saturday statement backing the creation of a deficit-tackling commission, blamed the “economic downturn we inherited,” the “years of failing to pay for new policies,” and the “trillions of dollars in deficits” the Bush administration created. 

Those themes were bundled up on the Sunday morning talk shows when Scooter’s top advisers over-populated the airwaves with a pre-scripted Bush-centered message in an attempt to justify the administration’s economic approach. 

And now, Obama’s lap-dogs like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Klein have placed the blame for the Gulf Coast Crisis on George W. Bush, even though he left office a year and a half ago.

On Chris Matthew’s syndicated show, Klein stated that “this is more Bush’s second Katrina than Obama’s first,” and, after Matthews agreed, Klein continued:
Yes, because it was the Bush regulations, it was Dick Cheney’s deregulation, and lording over the Minerals Management [Service].
And San Fran Nan said last week:

Many of the people appointed in the Bush administration are still burrowed in the agencies that are supposed to oversee the [oil] industry.

The cozy relationships between the Bush administration’s agency leadership and the industry is clear…I’ve heard no complaints from my members about the way the president has handled it.

Of course not.

So, how did this hypocrite become POTUS?  I believe Americans were lulled into the same state as this graduating Senior from Kalamazoo High School last night:

 
The good news is, Americans are waking up.  I pray it’s not too late.
 
Sources:  drudgereport.com, breitbart.com, boston.com, twitter.com/chuck todd, latimes.com, foxnews.com, newsbusters.org, examiner.com

By Their Fruits, Ye Shall Know Them…

The imam behind the proposed mosque near Ground Zero in New York has been discovered to have ties with the leading sponsor of the pro-Palestinian activists, who clashed with Israeli commandos at sea last week.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a key figure in Malaysia-based Perdana Global Peace Organization, the single biggest donor to the Free Gaza Movement.

This is directly from their website:

Feisal Abdul Rauf has been Imam of Masjid al-Farah in New York City since 1983. Through his sermons and writings, Imam Abdul Rauf seeks to provide spiritual seekers with answers to their eternal questions that often hinder them from developing a personal relationship with the Divine.

He is the founder of the ASMA Society, dedicated to furthering Islamic Art and Culture. He invites non-Muslims to experience the spiritual impulse of Islam, and Muslims to develop on the spiritual path.

Perdana was also a key organizer of the six-ship flotilla that tried to break Israel’s economic blockade of the Hamas-run Gaza Strip last Monday.

Deborah Burlingame, the sister of the American Airlines pilot whose hijacked plane struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, said the indirect ties of the imam to the protesters were not surprising.

I think it goes to show he is not the man he represents himself to be. We have two Imam Raufs.

We have the anti-Israel, anti-democratic imam, and we have the smiling, soft-spoken moderate Muslim who says ‘”Why can’t we all get along?”

Imam Rauf is the head of the Cordoba Institute, which is ramrodding the highly controversial project,  a 15-story mega-mosque at the former Park Place Burlington Coat Factory, 600 feet from Ground Zero.

Rauf had earlier said that a mosque at the site would help to “bridge the great divide” between Muslims and the rest of America:

We are Americans, we are Muslim Americans. Many of us were born in the United States. We have no higher aspirations that to bring up our children in peace and harmony in this country.

Freedom of assembly is the right of all Americans.

Let’s take another look at Imam Rauf, shall we? 

On May 25, 2010, Imam Rauf wrote the following for the New York Daily News:

My colleagues and I are the anti-terrorists. We are the people who want to embolden the vast majority of Muslims who hate terrorism to stand up to the radical rhetoric. Our purpose is to interweave America’s Muslim population into the mainstream society. [emphasis added]

March 24, 2010, Abdul Rauf was featured in an article in Arabic for the website Rights4All entitled “The Most Prominent Imam in New York: ‘I Do Not Believe in Religious Dialogue.’”

Right4All is not an unknown blog.  It is the website of the media department of Cairo University, the biggest university in the Arabic-speaking world.

In the article, the imam said the following of the “religious dialogue” and “interweaving into the mainstream society”:

This phrase is inaccurate. Religious dialogue as customarily understood is a set of events with discussions in large hotels that result in nothing. Religions do not dialogue and dialogue is not present in the attitudes of the followers, regardless of being Muslim or Christian. The image of Muslims in the West is complex which needs to be remedied.

Recently, on May 26, one day after his Daily News column –  Abdul Rauf was featured on the popular Islamic website Hadiyul-Islam.   At the same time on that website, a fatwa was being issued forbidding a Muslim to sell land to a Christian, because the Christian wanted to build a church on it.

Responding to a question about his views on Sharia Law and the Islamic State, he said:

 Throughout my discussions with contemporary Muslim theologians, it is clear an Islamic state can be established in more than just a single form or mold. It can be established through a kingdom or a democracy. The important issue is to establish the general fundamentals of Sharia that are required to govern. It is known that there are sets of standards that are accepted by [Muslim] scholars to organize the relationships between government and the governed. [emphasis added]

Current governments are unjust and do not follow Islamic laws.

New laws were permitted after the death of Muhammad, so long of course that these laws do not contradict the Quran or the Deeds of Muhammad … so they create institutions that assure no conflicts with Sharia. [emphasis in translation]

Gosh, how tolerant.

Imam Rauf has held these attitudes for a long time.  He was interviewed on 60 Minutes by host Ed Bradley on September 30, 2001.  Here is a partial transcript:

BRADLEY: Are — are — are you in any way suggesting that we in the United States deserved what happened?

Imam ABDUL RAUF: I wouldn’t say that the United States deserved what happened, but the United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened.

BRADLEY: OK. You say that we’re an accessory?

Imam ABDUL RAUF: Yes.

BRADLEY: How?

Imam ABDUL RAUF: Because we have been an accessory to a lot of — of innocent lives dying in the world. In fact, it — in the most direct sense, Osama bin Laden is made in the USA.

In a subsequent interview with Beliefnet on Islam and America, he was asked, “Some Islamic charities are being investigated for terrorist ties. Have you seen what you consider to be reputable Islamic charities being financially damaged?”

He responded:

We believe that a certain portion of every charity has been legitimate.  To say that you have connections with terrorism is a very gray area. It’s like the accusation that Saddam Hussein had links to Osama bin Laden. Well, America had links to Osama bin Laden – does that mean that America is a terrorist country or has ties to terrorism?

So, the Imam claims that America was an accessory to 9/11.  I wonder what he thinks about Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmm mmmm)?

Rauf wrote the following in The Washington Post:

The historic significance of President Obama’s speech to the Muslim world in Cairo cannot be overstated. Never before has an American president spoken to the global Muslim community. His speech marked a major shift in American foreign policy. … In just a few sentences he demolished the phony theory of the ‘Clash of Civilizations,’ which insists that Islam and the West must always be in conflict. Instead, he declared the United States is not at war with Islam and outlined a plan for how the conflict can be resolved. … He captured the attention of Muslims because, unlike most politicians, he was willing to critique both his own country and Muslims where they fell short of their ideals.

Isn’t that just lovely?

The dapper, gracious, can’t-we-all-just-get-along, Moderate Muslim Cleric, Imam Rauf persona hides the Islamist within.  This planned mosque is nothing but an egregious slap in the face of all the families of the victims of the worst terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil.   Mayor Bloomberg is nothing but an ignorant dupe for allowing this.  And, while you’re thinking about this, please remember under which President this outrageous travesty was proposed. 

Sources:  yahoo.com, perdana4peace.net,  dailycaller.com, pajamasmedia.com, wnd.com

Politicians Campaign. Leaders Lead.

Presidential Schedule for  the Week of May 31, 2010:

Memorial Day Monday, the President planned on pontificating at a Memorial Day Ceremony at Abraham Lincoln National Cemetery in Elwood, Illinois. However, his speech was redacted by a Higher Power due to Severe Weather and all he could do was to symbolically lay a wreath.  He and his family returned to the White House that evening.

On Tuesday, the President was supposed to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel at the White House, but President Netanyahu cancelled to provide leadership to Israel in the Gaza Flotilla Incident.  Obama instead welcomed President Garcia of Peru for a pre-scheduled meeting at the White House. 

According to Scooter, the two leaders discussed a range of issues, including “continuing to pursue the details” of a free trade agreement, security issues, climate change and a broader international vision of promoting democracy, human rights, press freedoms and economic development.

On Wednesday, the President met with General Odierno to discuss security and political progress in Iraq.  He then traveled to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and spoke to students at Carnegie Mellon University.   In his speech, Obama attacked the GOP:

[A] good deal of the other party’s opposition to our agenda has also been rooted in their sincere and fundamental belief about government.   It’s a belief that government has little or no role to play in helping this nation meet our collective challenges. It’s an agenda that basically offers two answers to every problem we face: more tax breaks for the wealthy and fewer rules for corporations.

This from the guy who forced through a Government-run Universal Health Care Plan against the wishes of the majority of Americans?  Hardly a surprising statement.

That night, the Obamas hosted a concert in the East Room honoring Paul McCartney, who was awarded the 3rd Gershwin Prize for Popular Song from the Library of Congress.

Before receiving the award, the Senior Citizen performed with stars including Elvis Costello, Stevie Wonder, Jerry Seinfeld, the Jonas Brothers, Dave Grohl of the Foo Fighters, and Emmylou Harris. McCartney serenaded First Lady Michelle Obama with a rendition of “Michelle” and closed the night with “Hey Jude.” McCartney claimed that he had been “itching” to sing “Michelle” to the first lady at the White House, adding “I hope the president will forgive me.”

I think I’m gonna hurl.

McCartney also offered a glimpse of his politics, sarcastically stating that he was especially happy to get the award from “this president” and saying that it was nice to get the Library of Congress award from “a president who knows what a library is.”

On Thursday, Scooter finally gave 30 minutes to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer concerning the subject of their Illegal immigration law that she signed into existence.    After the meeting, the White House issued an official statement proclaiming that “The president and governor agreed that the lack of action to fix the broken system at the federal level is unacceptable,” and that Obama “urged Governor Brewer to be his partner in working in a bipartisan manner on comprehensive immigration reform”.

That evening, the President spoke at the Secretary of State’s reception in honor of the Indian delegation to the United States-India Strategic Dialogue, which met at the State Department earlier that day.  At the reception, he announced that he would visit India in November because:

I firmly believe the relationship between the United States and India will be a defining partnership for the 21st Century.

Later that evening, The White House announced that the President had cancelled his family’s planned vacation, err, fact-finding trip to Australia and Indonesia, where he grew up attending a Madrassa, err, private school for wealthy families.  The reason originally given for the trip  was that he wanted to show his daughters where he grew up.
On Friday, the President met the Major League Soccer Men’s Champion Real Salt Lake at the White House.  Scooter also went back to Louisiana’s Gulf Coast for his third visit since the disaster began on April 20 with the explosion of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico.  Obama was in Louisiana the Friday before, but his visit did not produce the kind of emotional, connect-with-the-people presidential reaction that Democrats have been praying for.
It was also announced by “Baghdad Bob” Gibbs that President Obama has extended an invitation for a meeting next Thursday with the families of the 11 men who died after the Gulf of Mexico oil rig exploded.  Gibbs said:

The president will offer his condolences in person to those who lost loved ones in the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. The president sent a letter to each of the families extending an invitation to the White House. 

It only took you 46 days, Scooter.

Saturday, Obama announced that James R. Clapper is his choice to  serve as Director of National Intelligence – the fourth since the post was created in 2004 – and wants the Senate to confirm him quickly.  Clapper is the Pentagon’s current intelligence chief.  

In private, Clapper has faced off with lawmakers, sometimes resorting to cussing at them to make a point. Those strained relations may come back to haunt him as he awaits confirmation.

Last night, it was time for the Obama’s to party again.  Per the press release issued ahead of time:

Ford’s Theatre Society will host its annual gala on Sunday, June 6, 2010, at Ford’s Theatre (511 10th Street NW). The evening’s performance, titled “America Celebrates July 4th at Ford’s Theatre,” will be taped for broadcast on the ABC Television Network to air July 2, 2010 (9:00-10:00 p.m. ET). Modern Family cast member Ty Burrell hosts a star-studded program with appearances by Kelly Clarkson, Renee Fleming, George Lopez, Lionel Richie, Robin Roberts, Dick Van Dyke, Laura Michelle Kelly and Gavin Lee from the Broadway Company of “Mary Poppins,” the Soldiers’ Chorus of the United States Army Field Band, and cast members from the Ford’s Theatre production of “Little Shop of Horrors.”

My purpose in reviewing last week was to present a study in style over substance.  This man who was elected president has absolutely no skills as a leader.  The only thing he has ever excelled at is campaigning.   So, despite the Gulf Coast crisis, the economic crisis, two wars, terrorism aimed at Americans on our own shores, and corruption within his own administration, he continues on his perpetual campaign, interrupted only by vacations and trips to basketball court and golf courses…to the detriment of the greatest nation on Earth.

Sources:  drudgereport.com, suntimes.com, abcnews.com, content.usatoday.com, deathby1000opapercuts.com, politicsdaily.com, yahoo.com, nydailynews.com, nypost.com, nashuatelegraph.com

Idiots, Islamacists, and Pseudo-Intellectuals

Evidently when Helen Thomas was dating Abraham Lincoln, he never told her that:  

It is better to remain silent and be thought of as a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.

The following  jaw-dropping statement hit the internet Friday:

Elan Steinberg, executive director of the World Jewish Congress, sharply reacted to the 89 year old representative of Hearst Newspapers:

Shame on Helen Thomas. She is certainly old enough to remember the Holocaust and the Second World War. She owes an apology to all victims of the Nazis.

The grand dame posted the following insincere apology on her personal Web site:

I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians. They do not reflect my heartfelt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.

Thomas, the daughter of Lebanese immigrants, has covered the administrations of 10 Presidents in a career spanning nearly 60 years.  She made her idiotic comments at (believe it or not) a White House Jewish Heritage Celebration on May 27.

This statement was, in her mind I’m sure, a valid response to the Gaza Flotilla incident.

Speaking of the Gaza Flotilla Incident, the group Free Gaza is a major sponsor of that “relief” effort. 

The Free Gaza Movement is a Cyprus-registered charity.  Created on the initiative of six Americans in 2006, it now has a worldwide core group estimated at 200.   Their stated mission is to break Israel’s closure of Gaza, a strip of coastal desert territory blockaded since 2007.

Greta Berlin, a spokeswoman for the movement and a founder member, says:

Israel has no right to imprison 1.5 million Palestinians.  If governments won’t do the job, civil society will.

Free Gaza has been involved in nine seaborne aid missions to Gaza since August 2008, four of which made it to their destination. The flotilla intercepted on May 31 was the largest of the nine. Other boats turned away by the Israeli navy included one damaged in a collision with an Israeli naval vessel in December 2008, which barely made it into the Lebanese port of Tripoli. Israel arrested 21 activists sailing to Gaza from Cyprus in June 2009 and boarded their vessel after they ignored warnings to stop.

The Movement has not used Cyprus as an point of departure since last year, and Cyprus did not allow the latest flotilla to depart from there, citing reasons of national interest.

This organization claims it gets donations from citizens around the world. The largest donation received yet, was 300,000 euros ($366,000) from the Perdana Global Peace Organization in Malaysia. It says it does not receive funding from governments.

Guess who is a member of Perdana?  This is directly from their website:

Feisal Abdul Rauf has been Imam of Masjid al-Farah in New York City since 1983. Through his sermons and writings, Imam Abdul Rauf seeks to provide spiritual seekers with answers to their eternal questions that often hinder them from developing a personal relationship with the Divine.

He is the founder of the ASMA Society, dedicated to furthering Islamic Art and Culture. He invites non-Muslims to experience the spiritual impulse of Islam, and Muslims to develop on the spiritual path.

Does this guy sound familiar?  From my May 16th Blog, “Disrepecting the 9/11 Fallen:

The organization behind this project is the Cordoba Initiative and its leader is Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.

Despite the fact that the Cordoba Initiative’s website calls part of the $100 million-plus project a mosque, Imam Rauf says the project is not a mosque (Liar, liar, burqa on fire.) but will include a community center for all faiths that will include recreational facilities, a prayer space and a 500-seat theater that can be a part of the neighborhood’s trendy (attended by pseudo-intellectual Liberals) Tribeca Film Festival. 

Plans were announced this week to build a 13-story mosque and cultural center on the site of a four-story building that was a Burlington Coat Factory retail store until 9/11, when part of a plane’s landing gear crashed through the roof.   The building, currently housing a mosque, will be torn down.

One more little bit of news and then I’ll tie all this together:

Federal authorities reported the arrests of two New Jersey men late Saturday night, trying to leave the country for terrorist training camps in war-torn Somalia.

The men were identified as 20-year-old Mohamed Hamoud Alessa and 26-year-old Carlos Eduardo Almonte.  They were taken into custody by FBI agents and others at J.F.K. International Airport outside New York City. They planned to take separate flights to Egypt and then make their way to Somalia, where they would join an Al Qaeda-linked group known as al-Shabaab.  This group has been at war with the nation’s fledgling transitional government.

Muslims currently comprise 1 – 2% of the population of America.  Islamic websites claim 5 million out of our almost 300 million, but most experts say that number is an exaggeration.  Muslim leaders claim that fanatics are responsible for acts of terror in America and around the world.  I want to believe that.  However, it is very difficult to when so-called Moderate Muslims will not condemn these actions and the Koran encourages followers to kill “the Infidels”.

Why are pseudo-intellectual Liberals, who do not have a clue as to the significance of Israel, sticking their nose into a sovereign nation’s business?  Why are some Americans defending a bunch of thugs who want to build a symbol of terroristic triumph next to a scene of unimaginable horror?  Why are we having so many terror plots on our native soil being uncovered under this administration?  And some, only after their explosive devices failed?  And finally, why did the American President have to be talked out of making a personal pilgrimage, i.e., another vacation, to Indonesia and Australia, just last week, to stay home and deal with all this, the Gulf  Coast/BP Situation, and our failing economy?

Perhaps Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmm mmmm) is treading water in the deep end of an Olympic-sized pool, when he should have stayed in the kiddie pool.

Sources:  drudgereport.com, youtube.com, nydailynews.com, reuters.com, perdana4peace.com, foxnews.com

This is Hope and Change? Hardly.

Andrew Romanoff, the Democratic Senate candidate (pictured here), who is challenging incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet in Colorado, confirmed late Wednesday that deputy White House chief of staff Jim Messina (No, not that one, rock ‘n rollers.) presented him the choice of one of three high-ranking federal jobs if he gave up his candidacy.
 
The following is the offer, given in September by Mr. Messina, followed by the response, issued June 2, 2010, by Andrew Romanoff.  My comments are noted below in Italics, simply because I could not help myself. 

From: Messina, Jim (e-mail address redacted)
Date: Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:24 PM
Subject:
To: Romanoff, Andrew (e-mail address redacted)

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Latin America and Caribbean, USAID

As one of five geographic bureaus in the Agency and as a major contributor to the broader U.S. foreign policy objectives in the region, the Bureau for Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) promotes stable democracies, prosperous economies, secure borders, and cooperative neighbors in the Western Hemisphere. The LAC Bureau is taking a proactive approach to maximizing the impact of foreign assistance and continuing its efforts to transform and improve business operations that support Agency-wide reforms. In line with the new Foreign Assistance Framework, priorities include consolidating democracy, fostering growth through free trade and business opportunities, investing in people through education and health, and enhancing security by promoting alternatives to illegal drug cultivation. Additionally, the Bureau is implementing a number of highly visible programs in the Western Hemisphere, including support for the Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA); the Andean Counter-Narcotics Initiative; the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis, and Malaria; and the recommendations for the Presidential commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba.

Now, doesn’t this sound better than a boring ol’ Senate seat, Mr. Romanoff?

This position reports to the Assistant Administrator for Latin America and the Caribbean. The position functions as advisor to the Assistant Administrator, LAC. The position is responsible for oversight and general management of one or more LAC Bureau offices.

Director, Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID

The Director is the chief operations officer of the Office and a principal advisor to senior Bureau and USAID management in defining the scope and objectives of the Agency’s and the Administration’s initiatives to support democracy and foster good governance. Activities of the Director include oversight for all staffing and personnel functions in the Office, as well as oversight of technical officer recruitment, selection, and placement, and direct supervision of the senior democracy and governance advisors for the Agency. The Director provides program definition, design and oversight, and evaluation for USAID’s democracy and good governance programs and serves as a senior advisor in the administration for developing democracy and good governance program strategies. The Director supports democracy and good governance programs in all parts of the Agency and leads in the development of strategic approaches to democracy support and good governance. The Director represents the Agency at the senior level with other U.S. Government departments and agencies, with senior officials of foreign governments, with senior political officials from host countries, and with senior officials of U.S. implementing organizations. This position reports to the Assistant Administrator for Democracy, Conflict and Human Rights (DCHA).

If you don’t like that position, how about this one. Andrew?

Director, U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA)

USTDA was first created as part of USAID through the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and made independent in 1991. Their stated mission is to “advance economic development and U.S. commercial interests in developing and middle-income countries.” Unlike Ex-Im , OPIC and other international development agencies, USTDA does not directly finance exports and development. Instead, the agency seeks to achieve its mission by making small grants to fund feasibility studies, reverse trade missions, conferences, trainings, and other technical assistance programs that link U.S. companies to overseas development projects. With a budget of $55.2 million (FY 2010) and a staff of 78 professionals (48 full-time, 25 contractors and 5 foreign-service nationals), USTDA’s success is dependent on being able to seek out new opportunities, leverage its private and government relationships, and find development opportunities for both private business and larger federal foreign assistance/development agencies. A testament of USTDA’s success is its ratio of grant dollars spent versus dollars in exports created, which is nearly 1:35. This position requires Senate confirmation. (Don’t worry, the fix is in.)

Yesterday, U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff issued the following statement:

I have received a large number of press inquiries concerning the role the White House is reported to have played in my decision to run for the U.S. Senate. I have declined comment because I did not want – and do not want – to politicize this matter.

I’m still a member of the Democratic Party, I have to protect my political career.

A great deal of misinformation has filled the void in the meantime. That does not serve the public interest or any useful purpose.

Here are the facts:

In September 2009, shortly after the news media first reported my plans to run for the Senate, I received a call from Jim Messina, the President’s deputy chief of staff. Mr. Messina informed me that the White House would support Sen. Bennet. I informed Mr. Messina that I had made my decision to run.

Mr. Messina also suggested three positions that might be available to me were I not pursuing the Senate race. He added that he could not guarantee my appointment to any of these positions. At no time was I promised a job, nor did I request Mr. Messina’s assistance in obtaining one.

Parsing the language a wee bit, aren’t we, Mr. Romanoff?

Later that day, I received an email from Mr. Messina containing descriptions of three positions (email attached). I left him a voicemail informing him that I would not change course.

I have not spoken with Mr. Messina, nor have I discussed this matter with anyone else in the White House, since then.

This thing stinks to high heaven, and I do not want to be in the line of fire.

This startling revelation comes mere days after White House counsel Bob Bauer confirmed last Friday that White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel went through former President Bill Clinton in an attempt to remove Rep. Joe Sestak from the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary, where he was running against, and subsequently defeated political turncoat Snarlin’ Arlen Specter.

Both Bauer and Sestak have claimed that the congressman was offered only a slot on a presidential advisory board, which was not against the law, but this official account has sounded illogical and inconsistent and has fueled suspicions that Sestak was bribed with a more powerful position such as Secretary of the Navy.

This new revelation by Romanoff has succeeded in amplifying the nation’s concerns about the  White House’s offer to Sestak and makes Americans wonder as to the number of political bribes this administration has offered in its’ sleazy guest for political dominance and the depths to which the adminstration will stoop to grab and maintain power.

This is Hope and Change?  Hardly.

Sources:  Daily caller.com, drudgereport.com, yahoo.com
 

Free Speech for Me. None for Thee.

A group composed of more than 30 organizations has sent a letter to the FCC claiming that the Internet has made it harder for the public to distinguish facts from “bigotry masquerading as news”. 

The organizations also charge that syndicated radio and cable television programs “masquerading as news” use hate as a profit model.

The name of the group is the Natinal Hispanic Media Coalition.  With a name like that, one would immediately assume that it was formed to try to make us all say “undocumented” instead of “illegal”.   However, there’s more to this coalition than their publically stated ambition.

Per the letter:

“As traditional media have become less diverse and less competitive, they have also grown less responsible and less responsive to the communities that they are supposed to serve. In this same atmosphere hate speech thrives, as hate has developed as a profit-model for syndicated radio and cable television program masquerading as ‘news.’

The organizations also argue that the anonymous nature of the Internet gives ammunition to those that would spread hate.

They did not have the courage to mention any specific programming on the right or the left.  Their letter was written to support a petition filed by the National Hispanic Media Coalition last year requesting a probe of the relationship between hate speech and hate crimes.

The letter further states that:

The Internet gives the illusion that news sources have increased, but in fact there are fewer journalists employed now than ever before. Moreover, on the Internet, speakers can hide in the cloak of anonymity, emboldened to say things that they may not say in the public eye.

For these reasons, as the Commission deliberates how the public interest will be served in the digital age, it should consider the extent of hate speech in media, and its effects.

Who is this group?  Per their own description:

NHMC is a non-profit, media advocacy organization established in 1986 in Los Angeles, California.  The organization has grown to have statewide chapters in Sacramento, San Jose and San Diego, CA; New York, NY; Chicago, IL; Phoenix, AZ; Atlanta, GA; and Detroit, MI.

Our mission is to 1) improve the image of American Latinos as portrayed by the media; 2) increase the number of American Latinos employed in all facets of the media industry; and 3) advocate for media and telecommunications policies that benefit the Latino community.

As the Secretariat for the National Latino Media Council (NLMC), an umbrella of 16 of the largest national Latino organizations, NHMC executes NLMC’s national strategy on media advocacy as it relates to Latinos. 

Members of this coalition include Free Press, the Center for Media Justice, the Benton Foundation and Media Alliance, United Church of Christ, Inc., and Rainbow Push Coalition. 

 Free Press –   Founded in 2002 by avowed Marxist Robert McChesney, Free Press seeks to transform the media landscape – on radio, television and the internet – via (amongst other ways) sweeping rules changes at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Changes that would dramatically decrease private ownership of the means of news and information delivery, with the federal government assuming an ever greater replacement role.

The Center for Media Justice – Very active in stoking the flames of the Oscar Grant Oakland demonstrations, this group was founded by Malkia Cyril, their Executive Director.  Let’s allow their own website to provide a description of her, shall we?  Remember, these are their words, not mine:

Malkia Amala Cyril is CMJ’s founder and Executive Director. Malkia’s history as a media and movement strategist is informed by h/er organizing and communications work at We Interrupt This Message and the Applied Research Center, the Community Organizing Team, Youth Together, and the Youth Force Coalition in the San Francisco Bay Area.

As a queer, working-class African-Am/Caribbean born and raised in Brooklyn, New York, Malkia’s belief in media change as a core strategy for social justice is based in her experience as the daughter of a Black Panther mom: “I watched how media bias helped destroy a movement, and I believe in the power of strategic stories to help raise it again.”

Malkia is the author of numerous articles on movement building, political organizing, strategic communications, and media policy change, and creative works in anthologies such as Aloud, Afrekete, and In the Tradition. As an artist, organizer, and communications strategist, Malkia hopes h/er leadership and commitment to struggle speaks beautifully and humbly for itself.

The Benton Foundation and Media Alliance –   Per namac.org:

The mission of the Benton Foundation is to articulate a public interest vision for the digital age and to demonstrate the value of communications for solving social problems. Current priorities include: promoting a vision and policy alternatives for the digital age in which the benefit to the public is paramount; raising awareness among funders and nonprofits on their stake in critical policy issues; enabling communities and nonprofits to produce diverse and locally responsive media content.The Benton Foundation seeks to articulate a public interest vision for the digital age and to demonstrate the value of communications for solving social problems.

United Church of Christ, Inc. – Does the name Rev. Jeremiah Wright ring a bell?  Trinity Church is a member of this denomination.  They practice Black Liberation Theology.  They believe that Jesus was a revolutionary figure like Che, but they do not believe in the Resurrection of Christ.

Rainbow Push Coalition – Founded by Rev. Jesse Jackson in 1971, a result of the Rainbow Coalition merging with People United to Save Humanity.   They trace their history back to Operation Breadbasket, founded by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, which sought to combine theology and social justice, and to effect progressive economic, educational, and social policy in America.

To summarize, you have a bunch of Liberals trying to shut down Free Speech in the name of Social Justice.  They cannot compete with Conservatism in the arena of political discussion.  Therefore, they must shut down all communications of a Conservative ideological nature.  Otherwise, average Americans might feel those long dormant stirrings of freedom and patriotism again, and actually start thinking for themselves.   Once Americans start behaving like that, Far Left organizations like these will lose their base, and, more importantly to the leaders, their funding. 

So, since Liberal ideology cannot win against Conservative ideology, these people want to take away Conservatism’s chance to compete for the hearts and minds of Americans.

How noble.

Sources:  drudgereport.com, the hill.com, centerformediajustice.org, namac.org, rainbowpush.org