“Soylent Green is People!”

Do you remember last August 7th when Sarah Palin posted the following on her Facebook page?

The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.

Health care by definition involves life and death decisions. Human rights and human dignity must be at the center of any health care discussion.

Of course, the Liberal Obama sycophantic media and all his brainless minions immediately responded thusly:

ABC’s Rick Klein on August 13 wrote: 

ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports:

  Sarah Palin is standing by her discredited charge that House Democrats are proposing to create “death panels”. The former Alaska governor’s statement, which she posted to Facebook on Wednesday evening, came one day after President Obama implicitly took issue with her stance during a Tuesday town-hall meeting in New Hampshire.

Referring to Section 1233 of the House Democratic health care bill, Palin writes: “With all due respect, it’s misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients.”

The truth, however, is that the end of life counseling contained in the House Democratic bill would be voluntary.

As the Associated Press has reported, the House bill would permit Medicare to pay doctors for voluntary counseling sessions that address end-of-life issues. The doctor-patient discussions would cover living wills, making a close relative or a trusted friend your health care proxy, learning about hospice as an option for the terminally ill, and information about pain medications for people suffering chronic discomfort.

And even idiot Liberal Bloggers got into the act:

The reigning queen of Death Panel lies, Sarah “Sees Russia From Her House” Palin has taken a job as an idiotic commentator on Rupert Murdoch’s infamous propaganda arm of the Party of Jesus, originally the Republican Party.

False News knows a consistent liar with low IQ when they see one, sand Sarah should be a natural fit with racists pigs like Mor[m]on Beck and boisterous fools like Bill O’Lielly.

Mmmm, Death Panels!

Nice spelling and sentence structure there, Walt Whitman.

And, of course the completely unbiased (just ask George Soros) Media Matters: 

Numerous media outlets have now debunked right-wing claims that the House health care reform bill would encourage euthanasia of the elderly, including Sarah Palin’s claim — forwarded by the conservative media — that the bill would create a “death panel” and the related claim — initiated by Betsy McCaughey — that the bill would “absolutely require” that seniors on Medicare undergo end-of-life counseling “that will tell them how to end their life sooner.” Indeed, Media Matters for America has identified more than 40 instances of media reporting that these claims are false.

40 sources, huh?  Like MSNBC, CNN, NY Times, LA Times, thinkprogress.com, factcheck.com, etc, I bet.

So, the healthcare Reform, err, Health Insurance Reform, err, Healthcare Reform Bill, finally got passed, by hook or crook…mostly crook.   And then, as Nancy Pelosi said we would, we found out what was in this Obamanation.  For instance,some lovely little Bureaucratic Bonanzas called Exchanges and Co-ops.  Here is a summary explanation of their purposes from a legal paper prepared for Insurance Brokers:

 A statebased American Health Benefit Exchanges and Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Exchanges would be created for individuals and small businesses with up to 100 employees can purchase qualified coverage. The program would be administered by a governmental agency or nonprofit organization, through which Permit states to allow businesses with more than 100 employees to purchase coverage in the SHOP Exchange beginning in 2017. States may form regional Exchanges or allow more than one Exchange to operate in a state as long as each Exchange serves a distinct geographic area. (Funding available to states to establish Exchanges within one year of enactment and until 1/1 2015)  

Access to coverage through the Exchanges would be restricted to U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who are not incarcerated.  

Four benefit categories of plans plus a separate catastrophic plan would be offered through the Exchange, and in the individual and small group markets:

  1. Bronze plan represents minimum creditable coverage and provides the essential health benefits, cover 60% of the benefit costs of the plan, with an outofpocket limit equal to the Health Savings Account (HSA) current law limit ($5,950 for individuals and $11,900 for families in 2010);
  2. Silver plan provides the essential health benefits, covers 70% of the benefit costs of the plan, with the HSA outofpocket limits;
  3. Gold plan provides the essential health benefits, covers 80% of the benefit costs of the plan, with the HSA outofpocket limits;
  4. Platinum plan provides the essential health benefits, covers 90% of the benefit costs of the plan, with the HSA outofpocket limits; (§1311)  

Catastrophic plan available to those up to age 30 or to those who are exempt from the mandate to purchase coverage and provides catastrophic coverage only with the coverage level set at the HSA current law levels except that prevention benefits and coverage for three primary care visits would be exempt from the deductible. This plan is only available in the individual market.

But what about Co-ops?: 

A COOP initiative would be established to foster the creation of nonprofit, memberrun health insurance companies in all 50 states and District of Columbia to offer qualified health plans.

A grant or loan would not be awarded unless the following conditions are met to be a qualified health insurance issuer: an organization must not be an existing health insurer or sponsored by a state or local government, substantially all of its activities must consist of the issuance of qualified health benefit plans in each state in which it is licensed, governance of the organization must be subject to a majority vote of its members, must operate with a strong consumer focus, and any profits must be used to lower premiums, improve benefits, or improve the quality of health care delivered to its members.   

The cooperative would coordinate with the implementation of state insurance reforms required by this bill.

$6 billion would be appropriated to finance the program and award loans and grants to establish COOPs by 7/1/2013.

The Health and Human Services Secretary will be in charge of this boodoggle.  Regarding the Exchanges: 

  1. HHS Secretary is required to “establish procedures under which a State may allow” (but is not required to permit) “agents and brokers to enroll individuals” in Exchange plans;
  2. HHS would be required to establish an advisory board to assist with helping to clarify the requirements for the state exchanges. The Advisory Board must include “individuals and entities with experience in facilitating enrollment in qualified health plans.”  
  3.  Any state exchange can enter into contracts with private entities to carry out any exchange responsibility; although health insurance issuers are precluded from entering into such contracts, there is no agent/broker prohibition. 
  4.  Exchanges will contract with outside parties to engage in exchangerelated education, marketing and enrollmentrelated activities (“Navigators”). Insurance agents and brokers are expressly included in the list of individuals/entities contemplated as Navigators. Note, however, there is a restriction prohibiting anyone from serving as a Navigator who is paid in any way “directly or indirectly” in connection with the “enrollment of any individuals or employees” in an Exchangeprovided plan. HHS will be required to promulgate regulations that would apply to the state exchanges to ensure that any Navigator “is qualified, and licensed if appropriate.”  

Government’s role in Co-ops:

For a COOP to be eligible for federal startup assistance, its “governing documents [must] incorporate ethics and conflict of interest standards protecting against insurance industry involvement and interference.” Additionally, the federal advisory board that would be established to oversee the funding program for COOPs specifically bars any insurance industry involvement. 

Just think, all these potential decision makers are the same genuises who bought $10,000 toilet seats for the Pentagon.  Professional Bureaucrats, state Democratic Party Politial hacks, and Beancounters will be making life and death decisions over whether you are enough of a viable return on their investment in your Healthcare to making treating your illness a worthwhile proposition. 

Mr. Jones, I’m sorry you need a quadruple bypass.  But, at your age, surgery just would not be  fiscally responsible.  Here is a bottle of Flintstones Vitamins.  Good luck. 

Sarah Palin was exactly right.  God help us all.

Sources:  deathpanels.com, abcnews.com, mediamatters.org, Sarah Palin’s Facebook page, Provisions of The Federal Healthcare Measures

  

The Pee Wee Herman Defense

Just like me, I’m sure you have known some thin-skinned people in your life.  In fact, we have all been thin-skinned at one time or another as circumstances arise.   However, when you list the qualities that people want in the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, I doubt you will see that quality on the list.

This week, President “Scooter” Obama, met with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for the purpose of signing a Nuclear Arms Non-Proliferation and Reduction Treaty.    Part of this new policy entails not retaliatiing against a first strike against the U.S. with nuclear weapons unless you are a very naughty country.  Scooter’s ultimate goal is to wipe out all the world’s nuclear stockpile within 10 years. 

 Kind of gives you a warm,fuzzy feeling, doesn’t it?

Yesterday, former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin expressed her feelings about Scooter’s less-than-fearsome nuclear policy:

“It’s unbelievable. Unbelievable,” said Palin on Wednesday evening while appearing on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program. “No administration in America’s history would, I think, ever have considered such a step that we just found out President Obama is supporting today. It’s kinda like getting out there on a playground, a bunch of kids, getting ready to fight, and one of the kids saying, ‘Go ahead, punch me in the face and I’m not going to retaliate. Go ahead and do what you want to with me.’

“No, it’s unacceptable,” she continued. “This is another thing that the American public, the more that they find out, what is a part of this agenda, they are going to rise up and they are going to say ‘no more.’ National security, national defense is the No. 1 job of the federal government.”

“I really have no response. Because last I checked, Sarah Palin’s not much of an expert on nuclear issues,”Scooter responded in an interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos.

Wrong, Scooter.  While I’m sure Gov. Palin doesn’t know how to construct a atomic weapon, she’s knows a great deal about the game we play wih our old adversary – Sean Connery, The Hunt For Red October.

What Obama and his Far Left Cabal don’t what you to know is, that as governor of a state with Nuclear Missile sites and because of Russia’s closeness to Alaska, she was briefed daily from her commanders. She served 700 days in office,  gaining knowledge from her Military commanders.

 Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks.  It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units.

Paln, as governor of Alaska,  was briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism.

She was the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security’s counterterrorism plans.  Palin was privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country’s defense because of Alska’s proximity to Russia.

So, Gov. Palin actually does know what she is talking about.  I’m shocked, I tell you.  Shocked.

How did Scooter come up with this boondoggle of a treaty?    Well, according to CNN:

Negotiators (i.e., Bureaucrats) have been working since April 2009 to wrap up the “follow-on” to the 1991 START agreement. Talks were difficult, with disagreements over verification, including on-site inspection of missiles that carry nuclear warheads.

A U.S. official with knowledge of the talks earlier said that negotiators had found “innovative” ways to verify what each side has ( phone calls…text messages?). Verification will be a top issue politically (no kidding) because the U.S. Senate and the Russian parliament will each have to ratify any agreement.

Russian officials at one point objected to the Obama administration’s plans to build a missile-defense system in Eastern Europe. Specifically, they were angered by news leaks from Romania that it had agreed to allow missile interceptors to be installed in that country.

The issue, according to arms control experts, was resolved by including non-binding language (well, that certainly put some teeth in it) in the START treaty’s preamble stating that there is a relationship between offensive and defensive weapons; however, the treaty itself deals only with limits on offensive weapons systems. This resolution could help placate U.S. critics who want no link in the treaty between offensive and defensive weapons, arguing that it might be used to try to limit a U.S. missile-defense plan.

The new treaty would be the first pact related to arms control since the end of the Cold War, experts have said, setting the stage for further arms reductions that will tackle thorny issues such as what to do with non-deployed warheads that are kept in storage, tactical nuclear weapons and further cuts in missiles and launch vehicles.  (How’s that unicorn doing in your back yard, Skippy?)

Some of those issues are expected to come up at the nuclear security summit in Washington on April 12-13. (Ya think?)

So, on one hand we have a former Alskan Governor, who was briefed daily for 700 days about the Russian Nuclear arsenal by Professional Military men.  On the other hand, we have a former law school guest lecturer/community organizer who has held the highest administrative office in America for a little over 14 months being advised by professional,  Liberal, government bureacrats.

No wonder Scooter had to resort to the Pee-Wee Herman Defense.  I know you are, but what am I?

Sources:  abcnews.com, cnn.com, usmessageboard.com

We’re All Rebels Now

Well, what was yesterday’s match that set off a  media firestorm and a Conservative website Flame War?  Obama’s nuclear arms naivete?  Those despicable Tea Party Racists (sarc)?  Michele Obama’s White House Garden?  Nope.

Yesterday, Gov. Bob McDonnell declared April Confederate History Month in Virginia.  Oh, the horror of it all.  Imagine that.  Trying to remember part of the history of America in Virginia, of all places, where the most battles were fought in the War Between The States. 

 Gov. McDonnell’s actions brought down a firestorm from the unofficial Office for the Enforcement of Political Correctness and Revisionist History.  I know. That’s not a real Government Office.  But, just wait.  it will be.

Late yesterday, Gov. McDonnell said that it was a “major omission” leaving out slavery in his declaration.  He further added:

The failure to include any reference to slavery was a mistake, and for that I apologize to any fellow Virginian who has been offended or disappointed…
Duly noted, Bob.  Yes, slavery was evil.  But, was it any less evil 30 years before in the Northern states?  And in Europe and Africa before that?
Moving on. Yesterday saw another Civil War erupt on  the top Conservative website for thought and discussion.   On this particular thread, they ran the following poll:
 Should McDonnell have proclaimed “Confederate History Month”?
Yes 48% (1,384 votes)
No 44% (1,290 votes)
Unsure 8% (227 votes)
Total Votes: 2,901
As you can see, the majority of Americans who voted on the poll, agreed with Gov. McDonnel.  However, the thread, being based on a contentious issue, also inspired such classy comments as:  

Southerners have long been an embarrassment to conservatism and the Republican cause. Supporting a confederate history month doesn’t help that, not one bit. No one that supports this can call themselves an American.

They should be remembered only when trying to identify the grave to spit on.

The same clueless individual made these comments…and he claims to live in Georgia.   Stay classy, Skippy.

The same people who want to ignore this part of history are the same bunch of self-convinced psuedo-intellectual Liberals who do not want the American people to remember their history.  Significant facts like the Progressive political philosophy of Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and FDR (thanks, Glenn Beck).  Or the fact that one of the issues fought over in the Civil War was the right of states to secede from the Union.  They would rather America’s history be swept under the rug or revised so that nobody’s feelings get hurt, thus freeing these usurpers to radically change this free nation into a mirror image of their own failed ideology.

What they didn’t count on was the courage and strength of will of freedom-loving Americans to fight against the unbridled expansion of Government intervention in their daily lives.  We’re all Rebels now.

Sources:  hotair.com, thinkquest.org, abcnews.com

 

The Attack of the Killer Casseroles

The White House, according to sources, is in the process of rewriting the United States National Security Strategy Document.  They are eliminating any reference identifying Islam as the source of Terrorist activities.  This comes on the heels on yesterday’s announcement that Scooter Obama has decided to enter into a non-proliferation and nuclear arms reduction treaty with the Russian Bear, trusting without verifying.  And we are not going to retaliate with nukes unless it is a very naughty country like Iran.   Hey Scooter, want to buy some beachfront property in Arizona? 

Gone will be the terms Islamic Extremist,  Islamic Jihadist, and Islamic Fundamentalism.  They are going to replace those terms with Very Angry Person of Middle-Eastern Descent Who Disagrees with the Flawed Foreign Policy of Booooshor something like that.

“You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, ‘We’re building you a hospital so you don’t become terrorists.’ That doesn’t make much sense,” said National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy.

Ramamurthy runs the administration’s Global Engagement Directorate, a four-person National Security Council team that Obama launched last May with little fanfare and a vague mission to use diplomacy and outreach “in pursuit of a host of national security objectives.”

Since then, the division has not only helped change the vocabulary of fighting terror but also has shaped the way the country invests in Muslim businesses, studies global warming, supports scientific research and combats polio.

I hear they also sell autographed pictures of Scooter sinking a jump shot. 

So, Obama is worried about offending devotees of Islam by linking them to extreme behavior.   After all, those weren’t Muslims that killed 3,000 people in the Twin Towers on 9/11.  Those weren’t Muslims that killed 220 Marines in their barracks in Beirut Lebanon in 1983.  Those weren’t Muslims that killed  sailors on the U.S.Cole in the waters off of Yemen.  Those weren’t Muslims that hijacked the Achille Laro.  That wasn’t a Muslim that blew up Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270.  No.   We must have been mistaken all these years.  All the Islamic Fundamentalists, err, devout religious practicers, are as peaceful as that private madrassa, err, school Scooter attended when he was living in Indonesia as a child.

According to the White House and their sycophants, err, Democratic Congressional leaders, the real enemies of America are all the Seasoned Citizens and Average Americans of all races attending the Tea Party Rallies.  And, for gosh sakes, be careful around those Southern Baptists and Chamber of Commerce members like me.  We might attack you with one of those killer casseroles.

Sources:  foxnews.com, guardian.co.uk, arlingtoncemetery.net

Consequences

In November of 1999, 5-year-old Elian Gonzalez arrived in America, after being rescued, floating in the Gulf of Mexico, escaping with his mother from Castro’s Cuba.  In April of 2000, that freedom was taken away from him by President Bill “Bubba” Clinton and Janet (I’m not going to go there) Reno, at the request of his father, still a peon (but probably given a government position for doing this) in Castro’s Cuba.  The picture you see here is Elian today.   After ten years of brainwashing, he is a proud Communist youth.

Decisions made by Presidents always have consequences.  Sometimes they’re good.  A lot of times they are not very good.  The decisions Presidents make literally affect not just the United States of America, but the whole world.  Sometimes the decision can have an immediate effect and sometimes the consequences to their decision has a delayed, but devastating effect on America’s future.

Today,  Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmm mmmm) will announce that he’s going to limit the scope of nuclear retaliation against enemies of America.  Only if you’re a really naughty country, like Iran, will our retaliation be nuclear.  His announcement proceeds next week’s non-proliferation summit with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in Prague where they will sign a new U.S. treaty with Russia that calls for cutting the two countries’ nuclear arsenals by almost a third.   According to Scooter Obama in an interview yesterday with the NY times:  

We are going to want to make sure that we can continue to move towards less emphasis on nuclear weapons.   

Obama is also hosting a Washington summit on nuclear non- proliferation next week.  On top of that, Scooter has announced that he wants to get rid of all nuclear weapons within 10 years.  Now, doesn’t that make everyone feel warm and fuzzy inside?

Whatever happened to Trust, But Verify? I have shown you the example of these two Presidential decisions to make a point.  It is important to have mature, logical, reality-based, patriotic President in the White House.  The first decision cost a young boy his freedom.  This decision may very well cost Americans our lives.

A House Divided

I am a Christian American Conservative. I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and I will not apologize for the greatest country on Earth.  

There has been a lot of conversation lately within the ranks of American Conservatives. In-fighting about what political philosophy and attitude to take. Should Conservatism be abandoned for the same kind of pseudo-intellectual arrogance and snarkiness that the Liberals practice with regularity and glee?

Or should Americans embrace Conservatism? Which kind of Conservatism? Fiscal? Social? Beltway/Moderate/Independent (a.k.a. Squishy)? 

The Republican Party has been practicing “Squishy” Conservatism in the last two elections. We are currently living with the consequences of that. Practicing this political philosophy of relative ethics and relative morality is akin to building a house on shifting sand.

Americans do not tolerate vacillating leaders for very long. Look at the problems besetting The Magnificent One, Barack “Scooter” Obama. Few Americans, except for his Far Left sycophantic base, are buying the “Hope and Change” he is selling. And they are upset with him because he is not “hoping and changing” fast enough to suit them. He even tried to reach out to the rank and file of his party and the Independents (one or two) who still might support him by attending church on Easter Sunday. He held a photo op at Allen Chapel, a historic African Methodist Episcopal Church, founded shortly after the Civil War. This action from the man who once said, “Whatever we once were, we’re no longer just a Christian nation…” and who regularly worships at the Sanctuary of the Holy Basketball Court. But I digress… 

Conservatives have a great opportunity ahead of us this November. But we will blow it if we do not present a united front. Our country is under siege from enemies, internal and external, that want to turn the “shining city on a hill” into a third-world barrio. We don’t have time for Internet Flame Wars, questioning the legitimacy of each other’s Conservatism. Nor do we have the luxury of wasting time ridiculing another Conservative for being old-fashioned or Christian. It’s time to man up. The barbarians have knocked down the gate and they are ransacking our homes. They have burdened future generations with a tax burden that may be insurmountable. For our children’s children’s sake, we must politically repel these invaders who wish to make us subservient to their failed ideology. 

So before I wrap this rant up, I wish to leave you with the words of the greatest American President in my lifetime. There are those who say he wasn’t a believer. I beg to differ. 

Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. “ 

If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under.”

We are never defeated unless we give up on God.” 

We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child.”  

Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.”

“Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure.” – President Ronald Reagan 2/6/11-6/5/04

courtesy cbn.com, brainyquotes.com

A Sinking Ship of State

The propaganda campaign coming from the White House since the passing of the Obamanation known as the Healthcare Reform Bill, err, The Health Insurance Reform Bill, err, The Healthcare Reform Bill, is that anyone who disagrees with it or anything that The Magnificent One, Barack Hussein Obama, (affectionately known as “Scooter”) does, is RAAACIIIST. This includes Seasoned Citizens and Average Americans (as well as people of color, too, I guess) attending Tea Parties, Townhalls, blogging on the internet, speaking on radio or television, or talking to their neighbors.

According to a teleprompter’s best friend:

“I do think that there is a tone and tenor — that needs to change, where we can disagree without being disagreeable or making wild accusations about the other side. And I think that’s what most Americans would like to see, as well.” – President Barack Hussein Obama from an interview shot in The Sanctuary of The Holy Baskeball Court with Harry Smith of CBS News April 1, 2010.

You mean like this, Scooter? Per Fox4kc.com:

“KANSAS CITY, MO April 1, 2010 – U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver voted in favor of the controversial health care reform bill, but talk isn’t raging about how voted, but whether or not he was purposely spit on as he and other congressmen made their way to the U.S. Capitol building to cast their vote.

In video of the incident, a man is seen with his hands around his mouth and yelling at the Kansas City, Missouri, Democrat as he walked by. The footage shows Rep. Cleaver reacting to the man, and is seen a few seconds later wiping his face.

The video is not clear as to whether or not the man spit in Cleaver’s face intentionally, or if it was a matter of “say it, don’t spray it.” Rep. Cleaver never commented on the incident, but it didn’t take long before many people claimed that he was spit upon.

In an interview on Tuesday with FOX 4 News, Rep. Cleaver would not directly answer the question of whether or not he was intentionally spit upon.

“I haven’t talked about this incident on TV or anywhere, and I’ve been approached to talk about it on every national TV show,” said Rep. Cleaver in an interview with FOX 4 News. “I never, I never reported anything, never a single thing in Washington, not one thing. People assume I went somewhere, never done press conference, never done an interview on it and I’m not going to do it.”

Rep. Cleaver’s refusal to discuss the incident has not stopped the speculation, including claims that the incident never happened, or that the story was manufactured to discredit conservatives who demonstrated against health care reform.

Rep. Cleaver says that he wants to put the incident behind him.

“All I’m saying is we all have to defuse it, and I think it is not in my best interest or in the best interest of this nation to stoke it,” said Rep. Cleaver. “I’ve avoided doing and I will continue to do it.”

After that bunch of liars and thieves up in The Beltway passed The Obamanation, their sycophantic pundits starting spreading the word that the American people were going to love this Government takeover of 1/6th of our economy, and President Obama’s popularity was going to soar to new heights. Not quite. There was an initial bump. But it turned out to be our Titanic Ship of State hitting an iceberg.

Per CBSNews.com:

“Last week, President Obama signed historic health care reform legislation into law — but his legislative success doesn’t seem to have helped his image with the American public.

The latest CBS News Poll, conducted between March 29 and April 1, found Americans unhappier than ever with Mr. Obama’s handling of health care – and still worried about the state of the economy.

President Obama’s overall job approval rating has fallen to an all-time low of 44 percent, down five points from late March, just before the health bill’s passage in the House of Representatives. It’s down 24 points since his all-time high last April. Forty-one percent of those polled said they disapproved of the president’s performance.

When it comes to health care, the President’s approval rating is even lower — and is also a new all-time low. Only 34 percent approved, while 55 percent said they disapproved.

Americans are still worried about the economy, with 84 percent telling CBS they thought it was still in bad condition.”

So, how have these astute political pundits, the Cable News Networks who were complicit in the ascension of The Magnificent One and the passage of The Obamanation, fared in their quest for viewers?

Per DrudgeReport.com:

CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THURSDAY, APRIL 1,2010

FOXNEWS O’REILLY 2,981,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 2,256,000
FOXNEWS PALIN 2,073,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,014,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 1,877,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 1,658,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 989,000
MSNBC MADDOW 950,000
CNN KING 839,000
CNN COOPER 820,000
CNNHN BEHAR 641,000

It does not look like they are faring too well, does it? Even Fox News’ version of a Liberal Newscaster, Tupelo, Mississippi’s own Shepherd Smith, is almost doubling the sycophantic, bellicose Keith Olbermann. And, please try not to laugh out loud at Joy Behar’s numbers. She’s sensitive, you know. (Yeah, and I’m a 22 year old Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader named Buffy.)

The bottom line is this. The American people are angry. A bill that the vast majority did not want, has been passed into law against their will. And now they are being spoken to like children, told that they have to accept this Obamanation and like it, like you speak to a child swallowing a bitter pill. They are further being told that, if they don’t accept this benevolent dictatorship, that they are ignorant and racist. As we say in Dixie, that dog don’t hunt. The vast majority of Americans love their country. They were raised to value individual freedom. And they truly believe the words that President Ronald Reagan said to them all those years ago: “The nine words you never want to hear are, I’m from The Government and I’m here to help.”

So, Scooter, Nancy, Harry, and all you super-geniuses up in the Beltway, you’ve pushed your Alinskymobile pedal all the way to the floor and you’re going to be pulled over to the side of the road by the American people in November. I hope you’ve got your Driver’s License and Proof of Insurance handy. And, by the way, be ready for a Breathalyzer Test. Because it appears to the American people that you are drunk with power.

WWJD About Social Justice?

Friends have asked me if I believe that Christ would be in favor of this “Social Justice” movement that has consumed some churches in America. I believe first you need a working knowledge as to who Jesus was. The following is from a blog I wrote on manlyrash.com at Christmas, “The Reason for the Season”

As some of you know, I was born and raised in Memphis, Tennessee. I now reside in Northwest Mississippi.The following piece was written in 1912 by the editor of the Commercial Appeal in Memphis, Tennessee, C.P.J. Mooney. Since then, it has remained so popular, that the newspaper has published it on their op ed page every year at Christmas.

JESUS, THE PERFECT MAN

There is no other character in history like that of Jesus.

As a preacher, as a doer of things, and as a philosopher, no man ever had the sweep and the vision of Jesus.

A human analysis of the human actions of Jesus brings to view a rule of life that is amazing in its perfect detail.

The system of ethics Jesus taught during His Earthly sojourn 2,000 years ago was true then, has been true in every century since and will be true forever.

Plato was a great thinker and learned in his age, but his teachings did not stand the test of time. In big things and in little things time and human experience have shown that he erred.

Marcus Aurelius touched the reflective mind of the world, but he was as cold and austere as brown marble. …

Thomas a Kempis’ Imitation of Christ is a thing of rare beauty and sympathy, but it is, as its name indicates, only an imitation.

Sir Thomas More’s Utopia is yet a dream that cannot be realized.

Lord Bacon writing on chemistry and medicine under the glasses of the man working in a 20th century laboratory is puerile.

The world’s most learned doctors until 150 years ago gave dragon’s blood and ground tails of lizards and shells of eggs for certain ailments. The great surgeons a hundred years ago bled a man if he were wounded.

Napoleon had the world at his feet for four years, and when he died the world was going on its way as if he had never lived.

JESUS TAUGHT little as to property because He knew there were things of more importance than property. He measured property and life, the body and soul, at their exact relative value. He taught much more as to character, because character is of more importance than dollars.

Other men taught us to develop systems of government. Jesus taught so as to perfect the minds of men. Jesus looked to the soul, while other men dwelled on material things.

After the experience of 2,000 years no man can find a flaw in the governmental system outlined by Jesus.

Czar and kaiser, president and socialist, give to its complete merit their admiration.

No man today, no matter whether he follows the doctrine of Mill, Marx or George as to property, can find a false principle in Jesus’s theory of property.

In the duty of a man to his fellow, no sociologist has ever approximated the perfection of the doctrine laid down by Jesus in His Sermon on the Mount.

Not all the investigations of chemists, not all the discoveries of explorers, not all the experiences of rulers, not all the historical facts that go to make up the sum of human knowledge on this day in 1912 are in contradiction to one word uttered or one principle laid down by Jesus.

The human experiences of 2,000 years show that Jesus never made a mistake. Jesus never uttered a doctrine that was true at that time and then became obsolete.

Jesus spoke the truth, and the truth is eternal.

History has no record of any other man leading a perfect life or doing everything in logical order. Jesus is the only person whose every action and whose every utterance strike a true note in the heart and mind of every man born of woman. He never said a foolish thing, never did a foolish act and never dissembled.

No poet, no dreamer, no philosopher loved humanity with all the love that Jesus bore toward all men.

WHO, THEN, was Jesus?

He could not have been merely a man, for there never was a man who had two consecutive thoughts absolute in truthful perfection.

Jesus must have been what Christendom proclaims Him to be — a divine being — or He could not have been what He was. No mind but an infinite mind could have left behind those things which Jesus gave the world as a heritage.

No. I do not believe that Jesus would be a part of the social justice movement. His was and is a soul-saving movement. One that still brings hundreds of thousand of peoplle to salvation on this terrestrial ball every day. A movement that, in fact, was embraced by the founders of this cherished land.

The following is courtesy of adherents.com:

There were 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence. There were 48 signers of the Articles of Confederation. All 55 delegates who participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 are regarded as Founding Fathers, in fact, they are often regarded as the Founding Fathers because it is this group that actually debated, drafted and signed the U.S. Constitution, which is the basis for the country’s political and legal system. Only 39 delegates actually signed the document, however, meaning there were 16 non-signing delegates – individuals who were Constitutional Convention delegates but were not signers of the Constitution.

There were 95 Senators and Representatives in the First Federal Congress. If one combines the total number of signatures on the Declaration, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution with the non-signing Constitutional Convention delegates, and then adds to that sum the number of congressmen in the First Federal Congress, one obtains a total of 238 “slots” or “positions” in these groups which one can classify as “Founding Fathers” of the United States. Because 40 individuals had multiple roles (they signed multiple documents and/or also served in the First Federal Congress), there are 204 unique individuals in this group of “Founding Fathers.” These are the people who did one or more of the following:

– signed the Declaration of Independence
– signed the Articles of Confederation
– attended the Constitutional Convention of 1787
– signed the Constitution of the United States of America
– served as Senators in the First Federal Congress (1789-1791)
– served as U.S. Representatives in the First Federal Congress

The religious affiliations of these individuals are summarized below. Obviously this is a very restrictive set of names, and does not include everyone who could be considered an “American Founding Father.” But most of the major figures that people generally think of in this context are included using these criteria, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, John Hancock, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and more.

Courtesy adherents.com

Religious Affiliation of U.S. Founding Fathers

# of Founding Fathers/% of Founding Fathers

Episcopalian/Anglican 88 54.7%
Presbyterian 30 18.6%
Congregationalist 27 16.8%
Quaker 7 4.3%
Dutch Reformed/German Reformed 6 3.7%
Lutheran 5 3.1%
Catholic 3 1.9%
Huguenot 3 1.9%
Unitarian 3 1.9%
Methodist 2 1.2%
Calvinist 1 0.6%
TOTAL 204

The Founding Fathers were, I do not doubt, aware of the following passage:

“Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”
2 Corinthians 3:17:

Isn’t it interesting that the enemies of personal freedom are always the enemies of relgious freedom as well?

In service to The King,

your humble kingsjester

Shut Up, He Explained

President Obama,(worshiping the false idol he loves the most [himself] in his most cherished sanctuary), stood on a basketball court and discussed the stupidity of his subjects, err, the citizens of America, with CBS “Early Show” co-anchor Harry “colonoscopy” Smith Thursday morning.

Smith asked Mr. Obama, who is left-handed, if he can ever go to his right.

“I can go to my right, but I prefer my left,” the president says.

(Just like his candidate endorsements, his famous jump shot often doesn’t reach the mark either.)

“You know, I’ve got a few other things on my mind,” said “Scooter”, who then makes the jump shot. “Its like health care, I always come from behind – I finish strong.” (So do most thieves when they’re robbing people, Scooter.)

Smith also asked the president if he is aware of the extreme (translation: accurate) terms some use to describe him, such as “socialist” or “Nazi.”

“Well, I think that when you listen to Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, it’s pretty apparent, and it’s troublesome (because he can’t shut them up), but keep in mind that there have been periods in American history where this kind of vitriol comes out (like that troublesome war those colonists started),” Mr. Obama said. “It happens often when you’ve got an economy that is making people more anxious (I don’t know why. It’s funemployment, isn’t it?), and people are feeling like there is a lot of change that needs to take place (A new President and Congress would be very nice.). But that’s not the vast majority of Americans (Nope. Only about 70 %.). I think the vast majority of Americans know that we’re trying hard, that I want what’s best for the country.” (Radically changing us into a third-rate European Democratic Socialist State is what’s best for us? I do not think that you know what the word best means.)

“I didn’t buy all the hype (But a foolish small majority of the American people did), right after inauguration, where everybody was only saying nice things about me,”(Not everybody, Scooter) he added. “And I don’t get too worried when things aren’t going as well because I know that over time these things turn.”(That explains the near tantrums, verbal snarkiness, Friday night news dumps, and political retribution Americans have witnessed.)

The president said both Democrats and Republicans have a responsibility to tone down the rhetoric, but that much of it has to do with the current media environment in which extreme comments are echoed in the blogosphere. (Shut up, he explained.)

original interview found at:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001596-503544.html

I’d Stay, But I’ve Got a Thing

Benjamin Netanyahu was born in 1949 in Tel Aviv and grew up in Jerusalem. He spent his high school years in the US, where his father, historian Benzion Netanyahu, was doing research. Returning to Israel in 1967, Mr. Netanyahu enlisted in the IDF and served in an elite commando unit, Sayeret Matkal. He took part in a number of military operations, including the rescue of hostages in a high-jacked Sabena airplane in 1972. In the same year, he was cited for outstanding operational leadership by the late Major General Motta Gur. Discharged from the IDF in 1972, Mr. Netanyahu participated in the Yom Kippur War and reached the rank of captain.

Mr. Netanyahu received a B.Sc. degree in architecture and a M.Sc. in business management from MIT. He also studied political science at MIT and Harvard University.

Between 1976 and 1982 Mr. Netanyahu worked in the private sector, first with the Boston Consulting Group, an international business consultancy, and then in a senior management position at Rim Industries Ltd.

In 1979 and 1984 Mr. Netanyahu initiated two international conferences that emphasized the need to fight terrorist organizations and regimes that provide them support. US Secretary of State George Schultz wrote that Mr. Netanyahu’s social activism and books had a decisive influence in shaping American policy on international terrorism.

In 1982 Mr. Netanyahu assumed the position of deputy chief of mission at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC. In 1984 he was appointed Israel’s ambassador to the UN, a position in which he served for four years. During this time he became renowned as a tireless champion of Israel’s cause in the international arena. As such, he led the effort for declassification of the United Nations archive on crimes committed by Nazi Germany.

Returning to Israel in 1988, Mr. Netanyahu was elected to the Knesset on the Likud party list and was appointed Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs. During the Gulf War he served as Israel’s principal representative in the international arena. In 1991, he was a senior member of the Israeli delegation to the Madrid peace conference and as such, participated in the first strategic cooperation program between Israel and the US.

In 1993 Mr. Netanyahu was elected Likud party chairman and served as head of opposition until his election to Prime Minister of Israel in 1996.

During his term as Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu implemented policy that combined fighting terror with advancement of the peace process. Its cornerstone was the conclusion of well-measured agreements with the Palestinians that insisted on reciprocity. During his three year term the number of terror attacks drastically decreased.

In the economic realm, Mr. Netanyahu led the liberalization of foreign currency regulations, accelerated privatization of government-owned companies and reduced budget deficit. During his term in office, the scope of foreign investment in Israeli high-tech industry reached billions of dollars per year.

After the completion of his term as Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu served as a business consultant to Israeli high-tech companies and was a popular speaker on the global lecture circuit.

In 2002 Mr. Netanyahu returned to politics, first as Minister of Foreign Affairs and then, in the course of 2003, as Minister of Finance. He initiated policies that encouraged growth by reducing the public sector and strengthened the private sector. They included the reduction of government expenses, tax cuts, transition from welfare to work, breakup of monopolies, resumption of privatization and introduction of pension reform. These steps, praised by the US administration, credit rating companies and the IMF, put an end to economic decline, lowered unemployment and spurred growth. An Israeli economy that was shrinking by about 1% each year starting in 2001 grew by 4.2% in 2004.

Mr. Netanyahu has written a number of books that appeared in Hebrew and English, with some also translated into Russian, French, Arabic, Japanese and other languages:

Self-portrait of a Hero: The Letters of Jonathan Netanyahu (1963-1976) – editor, together with brother Ido Netanyahu (1978)

International Terrorism: Challenge and Response – editor (1979)

Terrorism: How the West Can Win – editor (1987)

A Durable Peace : Israel and Its Place Among the Nations (1992)

Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorism (1996)

Mr. Netanyahu is married to Sara, a psychologist, and is a father of three. The Netanyahu family lives in Jerusalem

Courtesy Netanyahu.org

This week something happened at the White House that has never happened before in American history. A sitting President walked out of a meeting with the Prime Minister of one ofour closest allies and, foregoing the traditional photo op, press conference, and evening meal together.

All because this petulant man-child that was elected President and hisadvisors do not approve of Israel beginning construction in East Jerusalem. This is the same President who has apologized around the world for American Exceptionalism. The same POTUS who bowed and kissed the ring of a Saudi Arabian Prince. The same politician who sat in the pew of Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Church in Chicago for 20 years, a bastion of Black Liberation Theology. Black Liberation Theology, by the way, views Jesus as a revolutionary leader, like Che, and the movement does not believe in the Resurrection. They evidently do not study Genesis 12: 1-3, either. 1Now the LORD said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. 2 And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” For further information on Black Liberation Theology, please check out the blog “luoamerican.com”. Among his friends and admirers are also Louis Farakkhan, American Muslim Leader and avowed Racist. So if we can’t come right out and call President Obama a Muslim, can we at least say that he is a Muslim sympathizer?

The way Prime Minister Netanyahu was treated this week was a disgrace. The petulant man-child basically told Bibi and the Israelies, “If you’re not going to play with me the way I want you to, I’m going to my room and pout.”

Unprecedented, indeed. Shameful, too.