The NYC Mosque Mess: Will They or Won’t They? UPDATE: They Won’t

Will they or won’t they?  That’s the question everyone’s asking regarding whether the people behind the Ground Zero Victory Mosque will agree to move their “bridge-building” project to another location.   

So will the mosque be moving?  Don’t bet on it.   

New York Gov. David Paterson has announced plans to meet with developers of the controversial Ground Zero mosque some time this week to offer them state land , at another location, for their cultural and religious center. Paterson told Congressman Peter King about the meeting, and King said the governor asked him to make it public.    

Rep. King said:
The purpose of the meeting would be for the governor to discuss with the leaders of the mosque where state property is available.  Whether or not people from the mosque would be willing to consider that property. 

King also said that the governor “seemed very enthused” about the anticipated discussions. The governor has been trying to entice the developers into this meeting for at least a week.    

According to Paterson:   

I hope that they type of cultural understanding that they’re trying to promote when they build the center could be practiced right now.   

Gov. Paterson has expressed the concern that Mayor Mike Bloomberg, a staunch supporter of putting the mosque at ground zero, and President Barack Obama, might be advising mosque leaders to dig in their heels and insist on the present location.    

But some folks think that there is a glimmer of hope that they are open to a compromise.    

A Tuesday tweet from the Park51 (formerly The Cordoba Initiative) Twitter account said:

For the past week, we have focused on trying to respond to attacks and detractors of our project. What’s become clear is – they won’t listen.   

 In the next 140 character post, they added:   

Starting today, we’re going to begin addressing questions regarding park51. We’re open to any sensible discussion.     

In other words, they will decide what is sensible.  

According to Paterson’s office, discussions between his staff and the developer’s staff have been ongoing.  They said that the governor expects to have a meeting scheduled in the near future.  

Congressman King said the openness of the developers to a compromise will be the real test of their intentions: 

If the leaders of the mosque take up the governor on his proposal, it would show that their real intention is to bring people together, build bridges. And not just make a political statement by having a mosque at Ground Zero.   

Another problem is the issue of separation of church and state, and whether the governor should provide state land for a mosque.  

King said in this case it would be okay, especially if the compromise meets the need of both sides.    

Because of the ever-growing national debate over the mosque in its current proposed location, religious leaders said Monday they are worried this one building is leading to a nationwide backlash.Muslim leaders and those of other faiths are concerned.   

Mahdi Bray, the executive director of Muslim American Society Freedom asked:    

How far is too close? If two blocks near the Burlington factory is too close is that far enough?   

The ground zero mosque controversy is just one of many attempts to prevent mosques from being built all over the country, as I wrote about in the post, Mosques:  A Community Concern.    

Protests have been held on Staten Island, and California, and Tennessee, Wisconsin, Alabama and Florida.The building of mosques and the resistance from the buildings of mosques has increased throughout America as well as the destruction and vandalizing of mosque, including a pipe bomb placed in a mosque in Florida, according to Bray.   

Liberal leaders of other faiths joined the Muslins American Society Freedom on Tuesday.   

Rabbi Aurthus Waskow, the director of the Shalom Center in Philadelphia said:   

I know how I would feel if people started saying there were certain places you weren’t allowed to put up a synagogue and therefore I know what should not be done to people who want to put up a cultural center which will include a prayer space.    

Still, many at Ground Zero on Tuesdaysaid they were opposed to putting the mosque so close to where the 9/11 attacks took place. They are not against mosque construction in other parts of the city.   

Steven Van Cook of Queens said:   

It’s the location, yeah, this is holy ground. A lot of people died here.   

   Steven Goldberg of Bayside added:   

My objection is Ground Zero. This is a holy place. It should remain as a holy place.   

 What about building it in another place in Manhattan?   

Goldber replied:   

No, I wouldn’t mind because you know it’s freedom of speech in the country, but I object to it being here.    

When asked if he is opposed to the location or the building mosques in New York City, Vito Serzelczyk of Marlton, N.J., said:   

Location, location, location. This is a very sensitive area. I was here on Sept. 11. It was a terrible, tragic event and I feel sorry for the families of those people, victims, and this is not really the place to build a mosque.      

These guys are far from alone in their opposition to this symbol of Muslim victory.  According to a CNN/Opinion Research Poll, released on August 11th, nearly 70 percent of all Americans oppose the formerly titled Cordoba House.   Just 29 percent favor construction of the Ground Zero Mosque.   

When you break it down by party affiliation, 54 percent of Democrats said they oppose the plans for the project while 82 percent of Republicans said they disapprove.  Meanwhile, 70 percent of independents said they are against the proposal.   

The sad thing about this, in my humble opion, is that the Cordoba Initiative developers (Let’s call it what it is.), are in a win-win situation.  Right now, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is on a fund-raising tour of the Middle East, sent by our State Department.  If the developers accept Paterson’s offer, they will get free land from the state of New York and they can still complain to Muslims around the world about the mean ol’ American infidels not allowing the mosque to be built at Ground Zero.  If they refuse, and the project is completed, they will have a symbol of Muslim victory at the site of the largest Islamic Terrorist attack ever on American Soil.  Shame on the New York City politicians and commission members.  This inapproriate offense to the 911 fallen should never have gotten this far.   

UPDATE:  

The developers of  The Cordova Initiative  have rejected Gov. David Paterson’s offer to help them find a different site.

Paterson said today the group is apparently committed to building in the proposed site:

I think they would like to stay where they are, and I certainly respect that and I certainly respect them.

Paterson is disappointed.  According to him, the dialogue would have been useful as the project has ignited nationwide debate over freedom of religion and anger over the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks:

Having said that, how much more foresighted would it have been if the Imam who is the developer of the project had been willing to hear what we are actually talking about?

It does not suit their purposes to move the mosque, Governor.

The New “Dust Bowl”

From 1934 to 1940 , severe drought ravaged an area twice the size of Pennsylvania covering parts of Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico and Colorado. When the drought destroyed the crops, there was nothing to hold the soil of the wind-swept and treeless plains. The area became known as “The Dust Bowl.”

By 1935, winds reaching 60 miles per hour whipped the dirt into gigantic clouds as high as 1,000 feet blocking the sun. Dust reached the president’s desk in Washington and even reported by ships 500 miles out to sea. Storms blanketed highways in impenetrable clouds of swirling dust stranding motorists. With the land literally blown away, farmers left the area. By the end of the decade almost half the population, an estimated 300,000 from Oklahoma alone, migrated. Most headed to California in hopes of finding work and a better life. John Steinbeck immortalized the hardships and misery of these “Okies” in his 1939 novel “The Grapes of Wrath.”

The federal government moved to reclaim the land by strategically planting trees throughout the area that reduced the effect of the wind and by promoting scientific farming methods. The effort was successful. When the drought ended in 1940, the land could successfully be farmed again.

While hundreds of House members and dozens of senators hit the campaign trail in a fight to save their jobs with help from President Obama, more than 2 million out-of-work Americans are faced with being lost in a “Dust Bowl” of  unemployment obscurity by the end of the year. 

Even though Congress passed a jobless benefits extension in July, the boost only lasts until Nov. 30, meaning  a  backlog of recipients will lost their benefits all at once come December.  Between the end of August and the end of the calendar year, approximately 2.37 million Americans will stop getting unemployment checks, according to Labor Department statistics. 

The looming cessation of benefits is not going to help consumer spending among a depressed citizenry where the economy already ranks as the top issue for voters in poll after poll. 

According to Gallup Daily, 47 % of Americans believe Economic Conditions are poor and 62 % believe that the Economic Outlook is worse.

So, while President Obama is on a three-day, cross-country jaunt, doing the only thing that he is semi-competent at:   fundraising, Congress must now turn its focus from legislation to re-election.  Somehow, they have to convince Americans that their constituents’ fiscal well-being matters more to them than their own phony baloney jobs. 

Republicans criticized the president’s fundraising trip Monday. They used this fund-raising trip to show that his priorities are not in order.

The Republican National Committee has posted a new web video highlighting the five states Obama is visiting, along with the local unemployment rate for each. 

Obama will be making fundraising stops in Wisconsin, California, Washington, Ohio and Florida.  Most are states the president will have to carry in 2012 if he runs for re-election, and he is using his visits this week to campaign  for Democrats caught in tight races this November. 

Paul Lindsay, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee said:

Every day that the president is not talking about jobs and the economy is a day that Democrats continue to show how out of touch they are with the problems of the American people.

The NRCC premiered a website Monday, titled “The West Swing,” mocking Obama’s scheduled fundraiser with party leaders in Los Angeles Monday night. 

“Don’t let Democrats mislead voters — the economic mess is a result of THEIR failed agenda,” the site says, urging supporters to contribute to “offset” the Democratic money raised in California. 

Republicans, who were against the jobless benefits extension because they said they wanted it to be paid for, claim other action can be taken to lift up the economy.  Lindsay said Republican candidates in the months ahead are going to draw increased attention to the possible expiration of the Bush tax cuts. 

While Democrats argue that most of the tax cuts should be extended for all but the textbook wealthy, Republicans say they should be extended across the board. Lindsay said letting the cuts lapse ensures job growth will continue to stagnate.   He said:

This is the small business tax.

Democrats, in a hypocritical bit of political subterfuge, proclaim that taxes should go back up for those making more than $200,000 in order to start plugging the deficit.  They falsely claim that they’ve been able to stop an economic crisis from becoming considerably worse and are proud of their efforts providing short-term relief with repeated jobless benefits extensions , even though the federally funded cushion is deflating rapidly. 

White House spokesman Bill Burton whined on Monday that while Obama is “not satisfied with the pace of this recovery,” Republicans offer only obstructionism: 

We have been able to make some progress. What you see here is the Democratic vision, which is continue to make progress, keep on with the policies that are moving us out of this crisis. Republicans, he said, want to “obstruct the progress we’ve been able to make. 

Burton used the Wisconsin energy plant Obama visited Monday as an example, saying the plant was adding 80 jobs “as a result of new investment and the fact that they’re manufacturing something that people abroad and domestically are interested in buying.” 

Obama, stopping by the Wisconsin firm on his way to a fundraiser for state Democrats, said ZBB Energy Corp. is showing how “manufacturing jobs can come back.” He described the clean energy industry as one area where job growth can be fueled. and added:

We expect our commitment to clean energy to lead to more than 800,000 jobs by 2012. 

And I expect Joy Behar to turn into Florence Henderson any day now.

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said the president is playing a vital role by hitting the campaign trail.  Reed said on “Fox News Sunday”: 

I know the president will be campaigning throughout the country. He’ll be campaigning in many, many districts .  I think his ability to talk about what his administration has accomplished in terms of health reform, in terms of stabilizing a terrible situation. … To go back to the Bush policies would be a disaster for the country. And many candidates will be wanting that message. 

Right, Sen. Reed.  That’s why Democratic candidates are all running away from the president.

Meanwhile, House Minority Leader John Boehner on Monday requested that the Obama administration provide a complete list of new federal rules projected to cost the economy $1 billion or more. 

Boehner said:

The Obama administration owes the American people a full accounting of the degree to which its policies may be negatively impacting  job creation in our country.

Congressman, considering that, according to Gallup:

More than 6 out of 10 Americans in Gallup polls conducted this year have consistently said “most members of Congress” do not deserve re-election. These are the highest numbers in Gallup’s history of asking this question.

I would say that both parties have a lot of work to do to regain Americans’ trust.  If Republicans rise to power in a November Mid-term electoral sweep as predicted, they have the opportunity to make a difference in their constituency’s lives.  Or they can sit on their stools at the Beltway Country Club, drinking chocolate martinis, while more and more Americans are consumed by this economic “Dust Bowl”. 

 

Barry and the Baffling Backtrack

According to President Barack Hussein Obama (Peace be upon him) on Saturday, he did not express an opinion at the WH Ramadan Dinner Friday Night on whether a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero is appropriate:

Per “The World’s President”:

My intention was simply to let people know what I thought.

 

In this country, we treat everybody equally and in accordance with the law, regardless of race, regardless of religionI was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there 

I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding.

The president’s remarks come after a forceful proclamation made Friday at the Iftar dinner, when he wholeheartedly endorsed the idea of building a mosque and Muslim community center near the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack in New York”.

As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country.   And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable.

However, deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton said in a statement Saturday:

Just to be clear, the President is not backing off in any way from the comments he made last night.

It is not his role as President to pass judgment on every local project.
 But it is his responsibility to stand up for the Constitutional principle of religious freedom and equal treatment for all Americans.  What he said last night, and reaffirmed today, is that If a church, a synagogue or a Hindu temple can be built on a site, you simply cannot deny that right to those who want to build a Mosque.

The problem, Bill, is that is appears to the vast majority of Americans that Obama is ducking the real issue, which is whether it is appropriate or wise for the Muslim group who wants to build the mosque and community center – the Cordoba Initiative – to do so right beside Ground Zero.

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin addressed the matter late Saturday afternoon on her Facebook page:

Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? And, no, this is not above your pay grade. If those who wish to build this Ground Zero mosque are sincerely interested in encouraging positive “cross-cultural engagement” and dialogue to show a moderate and tolerant face of Islam, then why haven’t they recognized that the decision to build a mosque at this particular location is doing just the opposite? Mr. President, why aren’t you encouraging the mosque developers to accept Governor Paterson’s generous offer of assistance in finding a new location for the mosque on state land if they move it away from Ground Zero? Why haven’t they jumped at this offer? Why are they apparently so set on building a mosque steps from what you have described, in agreement with me, as “hallowed ground”? I believe these are legitimate questions to ask.

News comes out this morning that the sponsors of the proposed mosque near Ground Zero are not slamming the door on Gov. Paterson’s idea to build the center someplace else.

“We are open to a conversation to find out more on what the governor has in mind,” the center, Park51, formerly named the Cordoba Initiative after a famous Muslim victory,  said in a Twitter post yesterday.

While mosque opponents charge the chosen site is insensitive to 9/11 victims, NY Governor Paterson (D) doesn’t oppose the planned location.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a useful idiot, is all for the mosque.  He said Obama’s remarks reminded him of George Washington:

Two hundred and twenty years ago this week, the Father of Our Country penned his famous letter to the Jewish Community of Newport Rhode Island or, as he called them, ‘the Children of the Stock of Abraham.’  President Obama’s words tonight evoked President Washington’s own August reminder that ‘all possess alike liberty.

Paterson and Bloomberg aren’t speaking for the majority of New Yorkers.

Rick A. Lazio, a Republican candidate for governor and a former member of the House of Representatives, said late Friday that the president was still “not listening to New Yorkers”:

With over 100 mosques in New York City, this is not an issue of religion, but one of safety and security.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., agreed. “President Obama is wrong,” he said:

It is insensitive and uncaring for the Muslim community to build a mosque in the shadow of ground zero.  While the Muslim community has the right to build the mosque they are abusing that right by needlessly offending so many people who have suffered so much.

But, hey, Liberals, don’t worry.  You’ve got back-up for your position.

A Hamas leader says Muslims “have to build” a mosque near ground zero.

Mahmoud al-Zahar said Muslims “have to build everywhere” so that followers can pray, just like Christians and Jews build their places of worship.

Al-Zahar spoke Sunday on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on WABC-AM. He is a co-founder of Hamas and its chief on the Gaza Strip.

Be proud, Liberals.  Be proud.

White House aides would respond to questions about whether the president decided to backtrack on  his remarks Saturday based on feedback from any particular person or organization.  But you can bet that immediately after his proud proclamation of support for the Cordoba Intiative at the White House Ramadan Dinner,  Axlerod, Rahmbo, and all sorts of advisers and Democratic leaders, were pressuring him to “clarify” his remarks in an effort to save their progressive backsides from the upcoming political massacre in November.

Unfortunately for you and your political party, Mr. President, just like your 27 hour phony photo op from this weekend, where you and Sasha were actually swimming in St. Andrews Bay, not the Gulf of Mexico, Americans aren’t buying your forced “clarification”.

The NYC Mosque: Religious Freedom or Pure Propaganda?

On Friday night, during his monumental announcement of support for the planned Muslim symbol of victory at the scene of the worst Islamic Terrorist attack on American soil in history, President Barack Hussein Obama (Peace be unto him) championed the building of the mosque as an exercise in Religious Freedom, in the spirit of our Founding Fathers.  These remarks came from the same man who cancelled the National Day of Prayer White House Breakfast each of the 2 years since his ascension to the presidency.

Obama has been supportive of Muslims in America since his Presidency began.  In a speech he delivered to the Muslim world on June 4, 2009 at Cairo University, Obama said:

I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America’s story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President John Adams wrote, “The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims.”

Time out, Scooter.  John Adams also said:

The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.

Now, back to the Cairo Speech.

And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States. They have fought in our wars, served in government, stood for civil rights, started businesses, taught at our Universities, excelled in our sports arenas, won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch. And when the first Muslim-American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers – Thomas Jefferson – kept in his personal library.

However, what the Liberal Main Stream Media never reported, was the fact that Thomas Jefferson kept a Koran in his library in order to gain a better insight into the way Muslims think, because of the War with the Barbary Pirates.

Obama and his minions are trying desperately to rewrite history , by trying to somehow subliminally imply that Muslims go all the way back in our nation to the Founding Fathers.  That is not the case.

From adherents.com:

There were 95 Senators and Representatives in the First Federal Congress. If one combines the total number of signatures on the Declaration, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution with the non-signing Constitutional Convention delegates, and then adds to that sum the number of congressmen in the First Federal Congress, one obtains a total of 238 “slots” or “positions” in these groups which one can classify as “Founding Fathers” of the United States. Because 40 individuals had multiple roles (they signed multiple documents and/or also served in the First Federal Congress), there are 204 unique individuals in this group of “Founding Fathers.” These are the people who did one or more of the following:

– signed the Declaration of Independence
– signed the Articles of Confederation
– attended the Constitutional Convention of 1787
– signed the Constitution of the United States of America
– served as Senators in the First Federal Congress (1789-1791)
– served as U.S. Representatives in the First Federal Congress

The religious affiliations of these individuals are summarized below. Obviously this is a very restrictive set of names, and does not include everyone who could be considered an “American Founding Father.” But most of the major figures that people generally think of in this context are included using these criteria, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, John Hancock, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and more. 

<!–

–>

Religious Affiliation
of U.S. Founding Fathers
# of
Founding
Fathers
% of
Founding
Fathers
Episcopalian/Anglican 88 54.7%
Presbyterian 30 18.6%
Congregationalist 27 16.8%
Quaker 7 4.3%
Dutch Reformed/German Reformed 6 3.7%
Lutheran 5 3.1%
Catholic 3 1.9%
Huguenot 3 1.9%
Unitarian 3 1.9%
Methodist 2 1.2%
Calvinist 1 0.6%
unknown 43  %
TOTAL 204  

Here are some quotes about God and Christianity from 3 Presidents of the United States whom you might recognize:

John Quincy Adams

My hopes of a future life are all founded upon the Gospel of Christ and I cannot cavil or quibble away [evade or object to]. . . . the whole tenor of His conduct by which He sometimes positively asserted and at others countenances [permits] His disciples in asserting that He was God.

The hope of a Christian is inseparable from his faith. Whoever believes in the Divine inspiration of the Holy Scriptures must hope that the religion of Jesus shall prevail throughout the earth. Never since the foundation of the world have the prospects of mankind been more encouraging to that hope than they appear to be at the present time. And may the associated distribution of the Bible proceed and prosper till the Lord shall have made “bare His holy arm in the eyes of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God” [Isaiah 52:10].

In the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior. The Declaration of Independence laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity.

Thomas Jefferson

The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.

The practice of morality being necessary for the well being of society, He [God] has taken care to impress its precepts so indelibly on our hearts that they shall not be effaced by the subtleties of our brain. We all agree in the obligation of the moral principles of Jesus and nowhere will they be found delivered in greater purity than in His discourses.

I am a Christian in the only sense in which He wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to His doctrines in preference to all others.

I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ.

George Washington

You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are.

While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian.

The blessing and protection of Heaven are at all times necessary but especially so in times of public distress and danger. The General hopes and trusts that every officer and man will endeavor to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier, defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country.

I now make it my earnest prayer that God would… most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of the mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion.

Mr. President, this is not an issue of Religious Freedom.  There are a lot of mosques in New York City.  This is nothing but an opportunity for the enemies of American Freedom to spit in our eye and gloat over the murder of 3,00o on our soil.  This is political propaganda of the most blatant kind.  You said a while back, that we are no longer “just” a Christian nation  and through your actions, you have tried to back that up.  The problem you face is the fact that 75% of this nation proclaim Christianity and only a little over 1 % claim to be Muslim.  Those of us belonging to the 75% percent believe as Founding Father and President John Adams did when he said:

The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.

All sources for the preceding post are embedded.

Obama and the Mosque: “His Muslim Faith”

Matthew 6:21

For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

President Obama hosted an iftar, the special evening meal observed during Ramadan, last night in the White House dining room.

Obama participated in a similar gathering last year.

Obama wrote in a statement Wednesday:

Celebrations like iftar dinners “remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings,” .

Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality … a reminder that Islam has always been part of America and that American Muslims have made extraordinary contributions to our country.

At the dinner Friday night, President Barack Hussein Obama (Peace be upon him) dispelled all doubt as to where he stood on one of the hottest subjects in America as he forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less:

As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country.

That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.  This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.

Republicans responded quickly to the president’s remarks.   Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y said:

President Obama is wrong.  It is insensitive and uncaring for the Muslim community to build a mosque in the shadow of ground zero. While the Muslim community has the right to build the mosque they are abusing that right by needlessly offending so many people who have suffered so much.

The White House had been silent on the subject of the mosque, which would be part of a $100 million Islamic center to be built next to the site where nearly 3,000 people were murdered when hijacked jetliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001. Press secretary Robert Gibbs had deflected the subject as a local matter.

It was already a national issue, sparking debate around the country as top Republicans including Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich spoke out against it.   So did the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights group.

Obama made it a presidential issue Friday in no uncertain terms.

While insisting that the place where the twin towers once stood was indeed “hallowed ground,” Obama said that the proper way to honor it was to apply American values:

Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect to those who are different from us — a way of life that stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today.

On the precipice of a Mid-term Election political massacre of Democratic politicians , Obama surely knew that his words would not only make U.S. headlines but would reach Muslims worldwide. The president has made it his mission to reach out to the global Muslim community, and guests at Friday’s dinner included ambassadors and officials from numerous Muslim nations, including Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.

While his pronouncement concerning the mosque may win him some new friends in the Muslim world, Obama, once again, holds a view contrary to the view of the majority of the people that he is supposed to be the leader of.   A CNN/Opinion Research poll released this week found that nearly 70 percent of Americans opposed the mosque plan while just 29 percent approved.

A number of Democratic politicians have run away from the mosque controversy like bachelors on Sadie Hawkins Day.  New York’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has been a strong supporter of the mosque, which has won approval from Liberal-stacked local planning boards.

The group behind the $100 million project, the Cordoba Initiative, describes it as a Muslim-themed community center.  Announced plans call not only for prayer space but for a swimming pool, culinary school, art studios and other features. The mosque group claims it will be a hub for interfaith interaction, as well as a place for Muslims to bridge some of their faith’s own schisms.

As I reported on Wednesday, the imam behind the proposed Islamic Victory Monument known as the Ground Zero Mosque Ground Zero is going on a multi-country jaunt to the Middle East funded by taxpayer dollars through the State Department.  Americans are rightly concerned that he will be using our money to raise the money he needs to build the $100,000,000 mosque. 

According to a State Department announcement that was given on Monday, Feisal Abdul Rauf is taking the publicly funded trip to foster “greater understanding” about Islam and Muslim communities in the United States.  Yeah, right. 

When asked about the trip, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said:

He is a distinguished Muslim cleric.  I think we are in the process of arranging for him to travel as part of this program, and it is to foster a greater understanding about the region around the world among Muslim-majority communities.

Crowley said no fund-raising for the mosque and cultural center during the trip would be permitted:

That would not be something he could do as part of our program.

However, Rauf is scheduled to make stops in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain and Qatar, Islamic countries with deep pockets.

And now we know why Obama sent him.

The mask is off now.  Remember when Scooter slipped and said:

All the Liberals defended him by saying that he was being sarcastic in that interview.  I wonder what their defense of last night will be?  And how quickly will all the Democratic politicians seeking office in the Mid-terms distance themselves from their President?  Is Obama really so naive as to not realize that Islam is not just a faith, but a political ideology as well?

Most importantly, given the documented history of this Imam and the group behind this mosque, has this 60’s Radical excuse for a president just publicly supported and emboldened the enemies of America?

All sources of information in the preceding blog are embedded.

 

Gaming the System

The title of this blog could have also been, “Taking Advantage of Misery”.

BP may possibly be paying millions in compensation to ‘fake fishermen’.

BP has already paid $308 million  to those whose livelihood has been affected by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

In order to receive BP’s money, fishermen must display a valid fishing licence.   Applications for such licenses have suddenly spiked by nearly 60 per cent, despite most fishing grounds being closed by the disaster. 

Three people suspected of abusing the system have been arrested in the past week in the U.S, but authorities are afraid that they are just the vanguard of a much bigger army of con men and women.

One genuine fisherman relayed the story of being approached by two men who wanted him to sign documents for them showing that they had worked for him.

He said he refused, but told the BBC that other captains have been offered thousands to sign similar such documents vouching for grifters trying to claim compensation.

Lt Col Jeff Mayne of the LDWF Law Enforcement Division said that Louisiana Department of  Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF) has sold 2,200 licenses since the spill:

Originally BP was paying checks to just anybody who had a licence and that may have spurred some of the fraud.

‘There were no real checks and balances on whether they were they really commercial fishermen.

I would like to say I’m surprised, but I’m not. It’s a lot easier to go and steal a resource than to rob a bank.

BP has admitted it is ‘likely’ that its compensation plan is being abused by fraudsters.

The company said it has set up verification centres examining several hundred cases and vowed it will catch anyone who milked the system.

A spokesman for BP said that up to ten per cent of compensation cases after any given disaster could be viewed as fraudulent.

Speaking of massive fraud, remember Shirley Sherrod?  Concerning the lawsuit against the USDA that resulted in her government position:

 The cash (settlement) award acknowledges racial discrimination on the part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for the years 1981-85. … New Communities is due to receive approximately $13 million ($8,247,560 for loss of land and $4,241,602 for loss of income; plus $150,000 each to Shirley and Charles for pain and suffering). There may also be an unspecified amount in forgiveness of debt. This is the largest award so far in the minority farmers law suit (Pigford vs Vilsack).

The Pigford matter has a long and checkered past, as this May 27, 2010 item at Agri-Pulse demonstrates (bolds are courtesy of the Washington Examiner):

As part of a April 14, 1999 class action case settlement, commonly known as the Pigford case, U.S. taxpayers have already provided over $1 billion in cash, non-credit awards and debt relief to almost 16,000 black farmers who claimed that they were discriminated against by USDA officials as they “farmed or attempted to farm.” In addition, USDA’s Farm Service Agency spent over $166 million on salaries and expenses on this case from 1999-2009, according to agency records.

An additional 80,000 African-Americans who have also claimed to have been discriminated against by USDA staff. came forward after the judgement was rendered.

Settling this case is clearly a priority for the White House and USDA. Secretary Vilsack described the funding agreement reached between the Administration and advocates for black farmers early this year as “an important milestone in putting these discriminatory claims behind us for good and in achieving finality for this group of farmers with longstanding grievances.”

Already, the number of people who have been paid and are still seeking payment will likely exceed the 26,785 black farmers who were considered to even be operating back in 1997, according to USDA. That’s the year the case initially began as Pigford v. (then Agriculture Secretary) Glickman and sources predicted that, at most, 3,000 might qualify.

At least one source who is extremely familiar with the issue and who asked to remain anonymous because of potential retribution, says there are a number of legitimate cases who have long been denied their payments and will benefit from the additional funding. But many more appear to have been solicited in an attempt to “game” the Pigford system.
 
Of course, what example of fraud and waste involving Uncle Sugar would be complete without a mention of  hurricane Katrina?
 
According to Government investigators, in its rush to provide Katrina disaster aid, the Federal Emergency Management Agency wasted millions of dollars and overpaid for hotel rooms, including $438-a-day lodging in New York City,

Reports released by the Government Accountability Office and the Homeland Security Department’s office of inspector general detail a series of accounting flaws, fraud or mismanagement in their initial review of how $85 billion in federal aid is being spent.  Hindsight is 20/20.

The two audits found that up to 900,000 of the 2.5 million applicants who received aid under FEMA’s emergency cash assistance program, which included the $2,000 debit cards given to evacuees , were based on duplicate or invalid Social Security numbers, or false addresses and names.  

Separately, federal prosecutors have filed fraud, theft and other charges against 212 people accused of scams related to Gulf Coast hurricanes.  Many defendants were accused of trying to obtain emergency aid, typically a $2,000 debit card, issued to hurricane victims by FEMA and the American Red Cross.

All three of these instances of fraud and corruption are examples of gaming the system.  However, the biggest con man in America today is spending 27 hours on the Gulf Coast with his family, and then, on August 19th, they will leaving the Palace of the Regime and travel to luxurious Martha’s Vineyard, where they will remain for ten days.  They are expected to stay at the 28-acre oceanfront Blue Heron Farm that rents for up to $50,000 a week.
 
After all, he is an honorary Kennedy, isn’t he?  Quite a contrast from clearing brush in Crawford, Texas, huh? 
  
This will be the Obama’s 5th vacation since July, bringing their total up to 10 vacations since the Immaculation (as Rush has appropriately named it).
 
While we “little people” are struggling harder than we ever have, just to pay our monthly bills, the leader of our nation and his spouse are acting like they just won Powerball.  The world has not seen this much tone deafness since Roseanne Barr tried to sing The National Anthem. 
 
Do one of you Libs out there want to try to tell America again how he is just like the rest of us?

Ed. note:  All sources will now be embedded in the body of the post.

A Game of Chicken: Scooter Vs A-Jad

Obama’s National Security Adviser James Jones has said that President Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmm mmmm) is willing to “sit across a table” from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad if he wants to talk about those nasty bombs they’re making.

The retired general also indicated that the return of three American hikers held in Iran for the past year would be an “important gesture”.

This statement by the administration is in response to a proposal last week by Ahmadinejad for a televised debate, live from the U.N., between Obama and the Iranian President:

Toward the end of summer we will hopefully be there for the (UN) General Assembly and I will be ready for one-on-one talks with Mr Obama, in front of the media of course.
 
We are ready to sit down with Mr Obama face-to-face and put the global issues on the table, man-to-man, freely, and in front of the media and see whose solutions are better. We think this is a better approach.
In an interview with CNN, Gen Jones said “the door’s open” if the Iranians wish to resume talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

When asked whether Scooter may sit down with “A-Jad”, Gen Jones said:

Ultimately if we find a convergence of paths all things are possible.

One thing they might do is return our three hikers. That would be an important gesture. It could lead to better relations.

 However, the President’s national security adviser warned there would be “no point in a theatrical meeting.”

With those two, would there be any other kind?

Gen Jones refused to speculate on whether military action might be considered against Iran if it fails to comply with international demands.

Meanwhile, A-Jad has trouble back on the home front.  Iranian businessmen both inside and outside the country say the economy is going in the tank (sounds familiar), while his many enemies from within the ranks of his own conservative faction in the leadership are very critical of his domestic policies. 

Recently, Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of our joint chiefs of staffs, was as comforting  as Obama on the administration’s Iran policy, saying that he had prepared an attack plan focusing on Iran’s nuclear plants while at the same time accepting he was unwilling to use it.

Both sides are open about the brinkmanship threats of force involved, with the wider Middle East fearing it will be sucked into open conflict. Gen Hossein Moghadam, former deputy chief of Iran’s Revolution Guard said:

If the US decides to take a pre-emptive action and attack Iran, Iran will have no choice but to strike the American bases in the region.

The heavy costs of such a war will not be just on the Islamic Republic of Iran. America and other countries should accept that this would be the start of an extensive war in the region.

We are ready to sit down with Mr Obama face-to-face and put the global issues on the table, man-to-man, freely, and in front of the media and see whose solutions are better.

Ahmadinejad wanted to debate last September, but the administration ignored him.  A-Jad has said Mr Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, had declined similar invitations because he was “scared”.

Ahmadinejad has on various occasions blamed the United States for “global disorders”, particularly the global financial crisis.

A-Jad ragged on Scooter for missing what he said were “historic opportunities” to repair relations with Iran, with whom the United States has had no direct diplomatic ties for more than 30 years.

Scooter tried in March 2009 to extend a hand of diplomacy towards Iran in an attempt to break the deadlock between the two countries, but since then, the animosity between the two nations has steadily worsened.

Ahmadinejad complained:

Somebody should answer questions whether the US government is dominated by the Zionists or the Zionist regime is controlled by the US government.

Israel, like the United States, has not ruled out a military strike against Iran to halt its “nuclear program”.

Iran has been slapped with four sets of UN sanctions while A-Jad has been President.  That has not deterred them at all in their quest to build nuclear weapons,   According to Iran, it is not enriching uranium for any military aims.  Yeah, right.

At the same time Scooter and A-Jad are playing this game of “chicken”, the Iran Revolutionary Guard is digging mass graves for American soldiers.

At least, that’s what General Moghadam, the Guard’s former deputy chief, said after film footage showed strings of freshly dug graves in the south of the country.

They were close to the site of war graves for the dead of the long war between Iran and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, which devastated the region in the 1980s.

Gen. Moghadam told the Associated Press, which obtained the footage:

The mass graves that used to be for burying Saddam’s soldiers have now been prepared again for US soldiers, and this is the reason for digging this big number of graves. The warning is unlikely to be more than symbolic. No-one expects a land invasion, should the White House authorise a strike on nuclear facilities, while Iran has so far suggested counter-action is most likely to be aimed at American allies in the Gulf and Western bases there.

Gen Moghadam’s claims might be a sign that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is increasingly reliant on the Revolutionary Guard for political backing, is feeling the heat of international diplomatic pressure over his arrogant posture concerning Iran’s uranium enrichment program.

The administration has been trying to take advantage of the diplomatic victory it won in forcing through a new United Nations sanctions package, with the unexpected support of both Russia and China, in June.  However, even with pressure on him from Obama and his administration, Ahmadinejad is still pursuing his quest to be a nuclear power.  It is a game of “chicken” for the highest stakes imaginable.  I pray that Scooter is not the first one to blink.

Sources:  drudgereport.com, telegraph.co.uk

Imam Rauf’s Taxpayer-Funded Solicitation

The imam behind the proposed Islamic Victory Monument known as the Ground Zero Mosque is about to leave on a multi-country jaunt to the Middle East funded by taxpayer dollars through the State Department.  Americans are rightly concerned that he will be using our money to raise the money he needs to build the $100,000,000 mosque. 

According to a State Department announcement that was given on Monday, Feisal Abdul Rauf is taking the publicly funded trip to foster “greater understanding” about Islam and Muslim communities in the United States.  Yeah, right. 

When asked about the trip, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said:

He is a distinguished Muslim cleric.  I think we are in the process of arranging for him to travel as part of this program, and it is to foster a greater understanding about the region around the world among Muslim-majority communities.

Crowley said no fund-raising for the mosque and cultural center during the trip would be permitted:

That would not be something he could do as part of our program.

However, Rauf is scheduled to make stops in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain and Qatar, Islamic countries with deep pockets.

Abdul Rauf said funds for the center will come from Muslims and members of his congregation.

In a London-based Arabic-language newspaper that interviewed Abdul Rauf, the imam says he also will collect money from Muslim and Arab nations around the world.  This means that he will be using this goodwill mission to build contacts in those oil-rich states.

Debra Burlingame, a 9/11 family member, asks some pertinent questions:

Does the State Department have any idea they are sending a guy to the Middle East who is going to be fund-raising perhaps among the very same people he will be meeting with?  We know he has a fund-raising association with Saudi Arabia.

 Burlingame also noted that the Saudis have contributed money to underwrite programs by the American Society for Muslim Advancement, a not-for-profit that Abdul Rauf runs with his wife and that is one of the sponsors of the Ground Zero mosque:

He’s going to the well, and how can they say they do or don’t know what he’s doing?

Meanwhile, New York state regulators said the sale of an adjacent Con Ed building needed to complete the Ground Zero mosque might be subject to review after all, even as clueless New York City Mayor Bloomberg insisted the project has “nothing to do with Con Ed.”

According to Public Service Commission spokeswoman Anne Dalton, state law requires the agency to sign off on the “transfer or lease” of any property a utility owns within its franchise area.

The question is whether Con Ed satisfied that requirement nearly four decades ago, when it granted a 99-year lease on the former substation site at 49-51 Park Place. 

So, just who is Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf?  Is he the “Moderate” Imam that the Liberals proclaim him to be?  Nope.  In previous posts, I presented detailed information concerning his ties to Perdana and the Gaza Flotilla, and his interviews with Ed Bradley and the popular Islamic website, Hadiyul-Islam.

I now present information that you may not have seen before:  An interview the Sydney Morning Herald, published on their website on March 21, 2004:

The US and the West must acknowledge the harm they have done to Muslims before terrorism can end, says an Islamic cleric invited to Sydney by Premier Bob Carr.

New York-based Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who impressed Mr Carr at an international conference last year, arrives in Sydney today for two weeks of meetings and public talks.

Speaking from his New York mosque, Imam Feisal said the West had to understand the terrorists’ point of view.

In a move likely to cause controversy with church leaders, Imam Feisal said it was Christians who started mass attacks on civilians.

“The Islamic method of waging war is not to kill innocent civilians. But it was Christians in World War II who bombed civilians in Dresden and Hiroshima, neither of which were military targets.”

Imam Feisal said the bombing in Madrid had made his message more urgent. He said there was an endless supply of angry young Muslim rebels prepared to die for their cause and there was no sign of the attacks ending unless there was a fundamental change in the world.

Imam Feisal, who argues for a Western style of Islam that promotes democracy and tolerance, said there could be little progress until the US acknowledged backing dictators and the US President gave an “America Culpa” speech to the Muslim world.

On July4th, 2009, United States of America President Barack Hussein Obama (Peace be upon him.), delivered that apology to the Muslim World at the University of Cairo, in the Islamic country of Egypt:

The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of co-existence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.

…So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

Even to the point of assisting in the building of a Muslim Symbol of Victory on the Hallowed Ground of the greatest Terrorist attack on U.S. soil in the history of our country.

Sources:  nypost.com, smh.com.au, nytimes.com

Congress Can’t Stop Spending

Just 84 days before a pending massacre in the Mid-term Elections, House Democrats are doubling down on stupid (That’s a Greek word for ignorant. [Thanks, Preacher!]) this week by returning from a recess that had barely begun to pass a $26 billion teacher jobs bill, ignoring the wishes of the American people to stop their record-breaking spending. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called lawmakers back to Washington from  Summer Recess last week after the Senate broke a GOP filibuster that paved the way for the bill’s passage.

The bill is meant to provide both teacher and Medicaid funding to the states.

Democrats and Obama administration officials claim that the package is paid for and will not add to the deficit. The bill, which the Democrats will ram down our throats once again, allows the ‘Rats to brag about saving tens of thousands of teachers and other government workers from being laid off before the start of the school year, and before the November election. 

In other words, the bill is a bribe to secure voters.

 Education Secretary Arne Duncan told Fox News on Monday:

This bill … will help keep 160,000 teachers around the country in the classroom as we start school the next couple weeks rather than on the unemployment line. 

But the fact that San Fran Nan and Arne evidently don’t care about, is that this vote takes members of Congress off the campaign trail to vote for yet another multibillion-dollar aid bill.   Republicans are quick to take the opportunity to use the looming vote as the latest example of Washington’s addiction to spending, something they claim they’ll put a stop to if they win back the majority in Congress. 

 Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels told “Fox News Sunday”:

It amounts at this point in time to asking the citizens of responsible states like ours to subsidize those places who have been more reckless.  It’s probably not going to help the economy. 

Daniels described the continuing stream of state aid as a form of “trickle-down government” that is not spurring private job growth. 

The bill is “paid for” with a cut to food stamps benefits and a tax increase on some multinational companies based in the United States. House Minority Leader John Boehner said those the provisions in the jobs bill would have an adverse effect.   Boehner said the vote just shows how oblivious Democrats are to concerns about spending. 

Boehner said last week:

The American people don’t want more Washington ‘stimulus’ spending — especially in the form of a payoff to union bosses and liberal special interests.  This stunning display of tone-deafness comes at the expense of American workers, who will be hit by another job-killing tax hike because Washington Democrats can’t kick their addiction to more government ‘stimulus’ spending. Democrats should be listening to their constituents. 

The Senate last week passed their own version of the bill, which cuts $12 billion beginning in 2014 from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance, or “food stamps,” program in an effort to make the measure deficit neutral.  Anti-hunger advocates and conservatives alike protested that decision.
 
According to Frederick M. Hess, director of the Education Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank:
 
We’re taking money from feeding poor kids so middle class teachers don’t have to look for jobs.

The bill is not very popular with poverty issue advocates either, who have voiced dissent over the depletion of funding for the food stamp program.

Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC), a non-profit group that focuses on hunger issues said:

The bill, if enacted, will do far more harm than good.  FRAC urges the House of Representatives to reject the Senate bill and move quickly to pass its version of Child Nutrition Reauthorization.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, more than 40 million Americans currently use food stamps, and that number will increase by nearly three million within the next year.

Some state leaders aren’t that thrilled to be receiving a lot of Federal money.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, whose state reportedly is set to receive $250 million in education money from the bill, said that some of the “stimulus funding” has helped, but eventually it has to stop. 

Gov. McDonnell said on CNN’s “State of the Union”:

I think it has to end soon because the federal government is running out of money .  We cannot continue to have all of the states rely on the federal government. 

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm disagrees.  She said that while the states do need to make cuts, the funding in the $26 billion package is necessary: 

This is not for bureaucracy. This is for people — real people who need real help out here. And this bill was entirely funded. 

From where, Governor?  The orchard of money trees behind the White House?

The state that will profit the most from the bill is California.  The state is set to receive $1.2 billion for education. The amount is projected to save up to 16,500 teacher jobs. 

With California and other states still begging for Federal money to bail them out of horrendous budget shortfalls, many lawmakers saw the congressional package as a way to boost their re-election campaigns.  Sen. Barbara (Call me Ma’am) Boxer, D-Calif., said in a written statement that the money comes “just in time” for the start of the school year. 

Just in time for her upcoming re-election battle, she means.   Ever since Barack Hussein Obama (Peace be upon him.), ascended to his throne, Congress has been spending like Michelle Obama on vay-cay.  And, unfortunately, it’s not going to get any better.  When these losers are voted out of office in November, the fiscal irresponsibility of their lame duck session will be the stuff of legend for decades to come.  On the bright side though, San Fran Nan and her bunch have given me an idea.  Let’s move Congress next door to the proposed Ground Zero Mosque.  The Muslims would never build it, then.  Too much Pork.

Sources:  foxnews.com, dailycaller.com, radioactiveliberty.com

Mosques: A Community Concern

Americans all over the country are protesting Islamic mosques being built in their neighborhoods.

Members of a local Tea Party group in Temecula, Calif., in late June ,protested outside Friday prayers at a mosque that is seeking to build a new worship center on a vacant lot nearby.

In Sheboygan, Wis., some Christian ministers led opposition to a Muslim group that wanted to open a mosque in a former health food store bought by a Muslim doctor.

These protestors have said their problem is Islam itself. They quote passages from the Koran and argue that even the most Americanized Muslim secretly wants to replace the Constitution with Islamic Sharia law.

These Americans are making the point that while Islam may be a religion, it also masks a violent political ideology.

However, Ihsan Bagby, associate professor of Islamic studies at the University of Kentucky, is disturbed that Americans are speaking out:

What’s different is the heat, the volume, the level of hostility.  It’s one thing to oppose a mosque because traffic might increase, but it’s different when you say these mosques are going to be nurturing terrorist bombers, that Islam is invading, that civilization is being undermined by Muslims.

The professor, along with other clueless Liberals, are upset about the growing number of authors and bloggers, some of them former Muslims, who are invited to speak at rallies, sell their books and testify in churches. Their message is that Islam is inherently violent and poses a threat to America.

Attempts have been made by Liberals to counteract this message. In each community, interfaith groups led by Protestant ministers, Catholic priests, rabbis and clergy members of other faiths have defended the mosques.

The Ground Zero Mosque cleared a final hurdle last week before the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission, and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg erroneously equated this monument to Islamic victory on 9/11 to the cause of religious freedom.  Liberals and the usual “religious” social justice groups supported the Cordoba Initiative.  Opponents included the Anti-Defamation League, an influential Jewish group, prominent Republicans like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker and the overwhelming majority of the citizens of New York City and the rest of America.

There a smaller dust-up going on in Temecula, about 60 miles north of San Diego.  Muslims have been there for about 12 years.  They comprise around 150 families who meet in a warehouse.  Their imam is Mahmoud Harmoush,  a lecturer at California State University, San Bernardino.  The group wants to build a 25,000-square-foot center, with space for classrooms and a playground, on a lot it bought in 2000.

According to Mr. Harmoush, the Muslim families had contributed to the local food bank, sent truckloads of supplies to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, and participated in music nights and Thanksgiving events with the local interfaith council.  He’s upset because they haven’t gotten any recognition for their good works:

We do all these activities and nobody notices.  Now that we have to build our center, everybody jumps to make it an issue.

That’s interesting.  Christians perform works like this for His glory, not ours.

A group of Americans have voiced their concerns about the mosque.  Diana Serafin, a grandmother who lost her job in tech support this year, contacted people she knew from attending Tea Party events and anti-immigration rallies.  They did their homework.  They read books by critics of Islam, including former Muslims like Walid Shoebat, Wafa Sultan and Manoucher Bakh.   She also went to a meeting of the local chapter of ACT! for America, a Florida-based group that says its purpose is to defend Western civilization against Islam.

Ms. Serafin said:

As a mother and a grandmother, I worry.   I learned that in 20 years with the rate of the birth population, we will be overtaken by Islam, and their goal is to get people in Congress and the Supreme Court to see that Sharia is implemented. My children and grandchildren will have to live under that.

 I do believe everybody has a right to freedom of religion.  But Islam is not about a religion. It’s a political government, and it’s 100 percent against our Constitution.”

Ms. Serafin was among 20 to 30 people who turned out to protest the mosque, including some who brought dogs along to offend those Muslims who consider dogs to be ritually unclean.  But they were outnumbered by at least 75 supporters. As a result of citizens’ concerns, the City of Temecula recently postponed a hearing on whether to grant the mosque a permit.

There are about 1,900 mosques in the United States, their meeting places vary from makeshift prayer rooms in storefronts and houses to large buildings with adjoining community centers, according to a preliminary survey by Mr. Bagby, the California professor mentioned earler.

A two-year study by a group of Liberal academics on American Muslims and terrorism came to the conclusion that contemporary mosques are actually a deterrent to the spread of militant Islam and terrorism.  I’m shocked.

The study was the product of professors with Duke’s Sanford School of Public Policy and the University of North Carolina.   They claimed that many mosque leaders had put significant effort into countering extremism by building youth programs, sponsoring antiviolence forums and scrutinizing teachers and texts.

Radicalization of alienated Muslim youths is a real threat, Mr. Bagby said:

But the youth we worry about are not the youth that come to the mosque.

In central Tennessee, the mosque in Murfreesboro is the third one in the last year to encounter resistance.

A group by the name of Former Muslims United put up a billboard saying “Stop the Murfreesboro Mosque.” The group’s president is Nonie Darwish, also the founder of Arabs for Israel, who spoke against Islam in Murfreesboro at a fund-raising dinner for Christians United for Israel, an evangelical organization led by the Rev. John Hagee.

Ms. Darwish said in an interview:

A mosque is not just a place for worship  It’s a place where war is started, where commandments to do jihad start, where incitements against non-Muslims occur. It’s a place where ammunition was stored.

 A spokeswoman for the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro,Camie Ayash, was upset that people were listening to what she claimed was “total disinformation” on Islam.

According to her, her group was stunned when what began as one person raising zoning questions about the new mosque grew into mass protests with marchers waving signs about Sharia:

A lot of Muslims came to the U.S. because they respect the Constitution. There’s no conflict with the U.S. Constitution in Sharia law. If there were, Muslims wouldn’t be living here.

Ma’am, I do believe your burqa’s on fire.

Here’s an example of the difference in Sharia Law as opposed to our American system, found at theamerican-catholic.com:

Instead of precedents and codes, Sharia relies on medieval jurist’s manuals and collections of non-binding legal opinions, or fatwas, issued by religious scholars (ulama, particularly a mufti); these can be made binding for a particular case at the discretion of a judge.

In Wisconsin, the Town Executive Council voted unanimously to give the Islamic Society of Sheboygan a permit to use the former health food store as a prayer space.

Dr. Mansoor Mirza, the physician who owns the property, said he was trying to take the long view of the controversy.

Dr. Mirza said:

Every new group coming to this country — Jews, Catholics, Irish, Germans, Japanese — has gone through this.  Now I think it’s our turn to pay the price, and eventually we will be coming out of this, too.

Gosh, Dr. Mirza, I did not realize that those other groups you mentioned had issued fatwas against the United States, too.

Unfortunately for those Muslims seeking to build a new life for themselves in America as one percent of our population, the deafening silence by their leadership around the world toward Islamic Terrorism has indicated to Americans that these horrible acts of  barbarism are not abhorred, but condoned.  So, therefore, Muslims should not be surprised as all when Americans are less than welcoming to the proposed building of Islamic Mosques and Community Centers in their communities.

Sources:  nytimes.com, theamerican-catholic.com