Today, over 24,000 e-mails, to and from Former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin, will be released to the public. Eager to try to denigrate and embarrass Governor Palin, in an effort to derail a possible presidential campaign, the two most famous newspapers in America came up with what they thought was a great idea:
At 10:56 a. m. Eastern on Thursday, June 9th, 2011, that bastion of journalism, washingtonpost.com, published the following missive to its loyal readers and moonbats everywhere:
Help Analyze the Palin E-mails
Here’s how to participate: Over 24,000 e-mail messages to and from Sarah Palin during her tenure as Alaska’s governor will be released Friday . We’ll be posting them here, and are inviting you to comment on the most interesting or most noteworthy sections. Please include page numbers and, where possible, a direct excerpt. We’ll share your comments with our reporters and may use facts or related material you suggest to annotate the documents displayed on The Post site. We may contact you for further details, by way of your registered e-mail with the Post, unless you specify otherwise in the comments.
Over 24,000 e-mail messages to and from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin during her tenure as Alaska’s governor will be released Friday. That’s a lot of e-mail for us to review so we’re looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those e-mails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release.
We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the e-mails. Participants can join from anywhere with a computer and an Internet connection.
If you need inspiration before getting started, take a look at what to expect from the e-mail drop. For micro-updates as tomorrow unfolds, check out our new Twitter feed.
After some unexpected blowback, the Washington Post updated their blog, writing the following:
UPDATE: We have had a strong response to our crowdsourcing call-out on the Palin e-mails. We’ve reconsidered our approach and now would like to invite comments and annotations from any interested readers.
Their readers did not quite respond in the manner in which the Washington Post thought that they would. It seems that Palin Derangement Syndrome only goes so far and then that still, small voice that tells you the difference between right and wrong takes over. Here are some examples of reader feedback they’ve received:
Y’all liberals sure do go to a lot of trouble to try and smear someone you consistantly say is an idiot.
Why are y’all so afraid of Sarah Palin?
So we’re going to spend our valuable time (in my case – $370/hr consulting fee) doing WAPO’s job, for no monetary return? Why? I’m way left, have no patience with moron Palin, but I wonder why you think we’ll all work for you for neither credit nor money.
Rake your own muck. Disgusting that you call on readers to join in your festivities.
Couldn’t agree more. Someone should gather WaPo and NYT staff/exec emails and give them some of their own medicine. Just the start/continuation of the lib/Obama smear campaigns that have been ongoing since the purposeful demonizing of Bush the jr.
What an obvious descent into National Inquirer/Star level urinalism.
Yes. That’s right. The New York Times lowered themselves to the same tabloid level as the Washington Post. At 1:56 p.m. yesterday, nytimes.com posted the following:
Help Us Review the Sarah Palin E-Mail Records
On Friday, the State of Alaska will release more than 24,000 of Sarah Palin’s e-mails covering much of her tenure as governor of Alaska. Times reporters will be in Juneau, the state capital, to begin the process of reviewing the e-mails, which we will be posting on NYtimes.com starting on Friday afternoon.
We’re asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy e-mails, people and events that we may want to highlight. Interested users can fill out a simple form to describe the nature of the e-mail, and provide a name and e-mail address so we’ll know who should get the credit. Join us here on Friday afternoon and into the weekend to participate.
Here are some of the responses that the NY Times received:
Don’t you folks get paid to do this work yourself?
Awesome! The NYT wants non-journalists to do their homework for them!
Jesus, is this what it’s come to? E-lynch mobs combing through data to use to as “gotcha” material?
Yeah, right, people will look for “interesting and newsworthy” emails. Yeah, and Dems are following Obamas plea for civility.
More like the Hatefest begins Fri afternoon, so Dems come early and come often, so our readers can feel better about themselves, after the Weiner debacle.
We will even give credit to the most snarky, snide, sarcastic person…so don’t be shy. We have a terrible President and even worse economy, so we need to divide and distract immediately.
I don’t remember the NY Times asking the public to go through then Senator Obama’s emails to find newsworthy materials…
I don’t recall you soliciting help from people to review the 2,000 page healthcare bill…nor did you do it yourselves.
Now, these two prestigious news organizations face a two-fold problem: First, the majority of their readers and the America public have recognized this tactic for what it is: “gotcha” journalism, and have responded to the newspapers appropriately. Secondly, if there proves to be nothing out of the ordinary as pertains to the day-to-day business of running the largest state in America as a result of their reading of the 24,000 e-mails, the Post and the Times are going to look like bigger sleazeballs than Anthony Weiner.
Sho’ ’nuff hate it for them.



















