The unanswered questions concerning the murder of 4 Americans at the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya linger on. And, at least one of the GOP Leaders, has some questions concerning the deafening silence coming from the White House:

Sen. John McCain claims the Obama administration might be conducting a “massive cover-up” with the deadly terror attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

On CBS News’ “Face the Nation” Sunday, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee said President Obama has been incompetent with the way he has been handling the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack.

“I don’t know if it’s either a cover-up or the worst kind of incompetence, which doesn’t qualify the president as commander in chief,” McCain said.

The Republican senator was primarily talking about statements the administration made early after the attack where U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said the Consulate attack was a “spontaneous” event caused by the anti-Mohammed film that caused massive protests across the Middle East.

Witnesses to the attack told The Associated Press that some 150 gunmen took part in the assault on the Benghazi compound.

“We now know there was no demonstration. There was no mob,” McCain told CBS News. “So for literally days and days, they told the American people something that had no basis in fact whatsoever.”

McCain added that this might cost Obama the election.

“Nobody died in Watergate. But this is either a massive cover-up or incompetence that is not acceptable service to the American people,” McCain told “Face the Nation.” “The American people may take that into consideration a week from Tuesday.”

According to the man who was ultimately responsible for the safety of those 4 murdered Americans, President Barack Hussein Obama, who was interviewed by his fan club at Morning Joe on the seldom-watched cable News channel, MSNBC, yesterday morning:

Anytime a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans who were serving our country get killed, we have to figure out what happened and fix it. But I do take offense with some suggestion that in any way, we haven’t tried to make sure that the American people knew as the information was coming in what we believed.

Of course, your eminence. How could we ever question your transparency. Why next thing you know, people will be accusing you of accepting illegal campaign contributions from Islamic Terrorists.

And, Lord knows, that would never happen. Oh, wait…

Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.

The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”

“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.

Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.

The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.

The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law.

One $15 donation was made at BarackObama.com using a confirmed Pakistani IP address. In other words, as far as the campaign website was concerned, the donation was openly identified electronically as coming from Pakistan.

Don’t ever miss another story like this. Sign up for free WND news alerts.

Upon clicking the “donate” button, WND staff selected the $15 amount and were taken to a page on the campaign website asking for a first and last name, city, state, zip code, email address and phone number.

The information submitted was: “Osama bin Laden, 911 Jihad Way, Abbottabad, CA 91101.”

While the website only has options for U.S. states and zip codes, there is no mechanism in place on Obama’s website to verify the individual is actually located in that state or zip code, or even in the U.S.

The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.

Uh huh. Pretty corrupt, huh?

It’s happened before, in 2008, according to newsmax.com:

…Obama has numerous donors who have contributed well over the $4,600 federal election limit.

Many of these donors have never been contacted by the Obama campaign to refund the excess amounts to them.

And more than 37,000 Obama donations appear to be conversions of foreign currency.

According to a Newsmax analysis of the Obama campaign data before the latest figures were released, potential foreign currency donations could range anywhere from $12.8 million to a stunning $63 million in all. With the addition of $150 million raised in September, this amount could be much more.

Isn’t it peculiar how both these scandals involve the Middle East?

Y’know, his first major speech overseas after becoming president was an outreach to the Muslim World on June 4, 2009, at the University of Cairo, in Egypt, where he said, 

I’m a Christian [Uh huh], but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.

As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.

Obama also once said that, the Muslim Call to Prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”

As president, the focus of Obama’s “Smart Power!” Foreign Policy has been the Middle East. As a proponent of Arab Spring, and a friend of the Muslim Brotherhood, (I mean, they must be friends, right? After all, they’ve been invited to the White House to meet with him several times, now.) Obama has endorsed the fiery revolutions which have happened in the area, resulting in replacing Moderate Islamic Despots with Radical Islamic Despots, backed by that same Muslim Brotherhood, the Granddaddy of Islamic Terrorist Organizations.

Was Obama himself, responsible for the “Stand Down” order, which stopped our Armed Forces from attempting to save those 4 Americans?

And, if so, why did he give it? Was it simply for the sake of political expediency?

These are among the questions which need to be answered about BenghaziGate…for America’s continued safety.

Immediately.