Governor Rick Perry and the Texas Dream Act: Rewarding the Child for the Parents’ Crime

During the Fox News Channel/Google Debate last Thursday evening, featuring the Republican Candidates who are contending for the party’s Presidential Nomination, Governor Rick Perry of Texas said:

If you say that we should not educate children who come into our state for no other reason than that they’ve been brought their through no fault of their own, I don’t think you have a heart.  We need to be educating these children because they will become a drag on our society. I think that’s what Texans wanted to do. Out of 181 members of the Texas legislature when this issue came up [there were] only four dissenting votes. This was a state issue. Texas voted on it. And I still support it today.

What is he talking about?  The Senate voted down the Dream Act in December, 2010, didn’t they?

Well, in 2001, Governor Rick Perry signed Texas House Bill 1403 into law.  This law has become known as the Texas Dream Act:

This bill states that non-citizens (illegal immigrants) may be able to apply for state financial aid if they have:

Lived in Texas for three years, at least part of the time with a parent or court-appointed legal guardian

Graduated from a Texas high school (or received a GED)

Not attended an institution of higher education before fall 2001

Signed an affidavit stating they will apply for permanent residency as soon as they are eligible.

In other words, they promise to become citizens…cross their hearts.

All is not milk and honey for the children of illegal immigrants seeking a free college education in the Lone Star State.  According to Texas State Technical College, there’s a catch:

However, as with any type of state financial aid, funding is very limited and everyone that qualifies may not receive an award due to a lack of funding. You must complete the affidavit available on this [their] website and you should be prepared to provide any proof or documentation that may be requested by the college.

Can you say:  leaving yourself an out?

Even though Texas has their own version of the Dream Act, the state is still struggling with its citizens who remained opposed to illegal immigration, as the Austin-American Statesman reports:

Supporters of stricter immigration laws today said Gov. Rick Perry needs to leave the presidential campaign trail and call the Legislature back to tackle a ban on so-called sanctuary cities.

A sanctuary city prohibits law enforcement from asking about the immigration status of the people they detain. In January, Perry put a ban on sanctuary cities on his list of emergency items, meaning he wanted the Legislature to tackle them promptly. But the ban did not pass in the regular session, nor in a 30-day special session that followed.

“Governor Perry needs to clarify where he stands on illegal immigration and he needs to come back to Texas and finish the people’s unfinished business,” said JoAnn Fleming, who chairs the advisory committee for the Legislature’s Tea Party Caucus.

She added, “Governor Perry needs to take care of the issue. If it was an emergency item in January, if it was an emergency item in May for the special session, it is an emergency item today.”

Opposition from Democrats and key figures in the business community who lobbied the Legislature kept the ban from passing in either the regular or special session.

While I do believe that Governor Perry is a good man, and if it does come down to choosing between him and Governor Romney, I would choose him, I have a question to respectfully ask:

Governor Perry:

What part of the word “illegal” do you not understand? What makes the current influx of illegal immigrants exempt from the rules and regulations that every other generation of immigrants to this country had to abide by in order to become legal citizens of the greatest nation in the world? By being here illegally, they are not entitled to the same rights as natural born or naturalized American citizens. In fact, their entry into this sacred land is no better than that of someone who breaks into someone’s home, does their dishes, cuts their yard, cleans their house, and then helps themselves to their food and drives their car without asking. This is in no way a human rights issue. Freedom is God-given. And with freedom comes responsibility. With citizenship comes responsibility, like paying taxes and making your own way. Illegal immigration reminds me of the amorous boyfriend who wants everything a young woman will give him, but will leave her at the first mention of marriage.  This is not a civil rights issue. Illegals do not have the same rights as American citizens. With our rights, come the responsibilities of being an American citizen.

And, by the way, please tell the illegal students that the Mexican flag, by protocol, will always be flown in a subordinate position to the American Flag in this country. Also, please remind them that the American dialect of the English language is the language spoken in this country.

Thank you, Governor.

While the children of illegal immigrants should be given the opportunity to become contributing American citizens, it needs to be done without rewarding them for their parents’ crime.

Because, as the English found out in the Revolutionary War, when the Prince of Hesse-Cassel, Frederick II, made off like a bandit in his dealings with George III by selling the services of 12,000 Hessians to the English at [sterling]7 4s. a head…you can’t buy allegiance to a flag.

6 thoughts on “Governor Rick Perry and the Texas Dream Act: Rewarding the Child for the Parents’ Crime

  1. workingclass artist's avatar workingclass artist

    In 2005 Texas legislated to allow residential for in-state tuition for these kids under certain criteria….Texas avoided future lawsuits and saved education costs. Only 4 legislators voted against the bill.

    Utah made the same decision in 2002.
    California 2001
    Washington 2003
    Wisconsin 2009
    New York 2002
    New Mexico 2005
    Nebraska 2006
    Kansas 2004
    Illinois 2003

    Oklahoma 2008 Similar Law
    Oregon 2009 Similar Law

    Arkansas 2009 Pending

    *Tennessee Prohibits it Pending*

    4 states legislated to prohibit it.
    South Carolina 2008 Prohibits
    Georgia 2008
    Colorado 2009
    Arizona 2006

    Every other state in the Union doesn’t provide in-state tuition but also doesn’t prohibit it.

    Santorum & Romney have turned this into an immigration issue instead of a border security issue….GOP will lose this election as immigration is the only issue that unites the hispanic vote. Turned Reagan’s California blue in 1994.

    Number #1 issue for that voting block is education. #2 is jobs. So Romney & Santorum are genius political tacticians and democrats will gleefully pounce on it. Even Rush warned conservatives about it.

    Obama won with 67% of that voting block. Bush won with 41-44% of that block.

    Blaming Perry & Texas for schooling and employing people they can’t deport as opposed to being like California is about the most stupid political tactic ever.

    Makes about as much sense as building a wall in the middle of a 1200 mile river…The Rio Grande

    “An unmanned obstacle is not an obstacle” – Perry on Hannity Radio

    But I’m just a conservative from a conservative state…Texas

    Like

  2. Gohawgs's avatar Gohawgs

    Well they’re here, we might as well clothe them/feed them/educate them/medicate them…RIght?

    Nope…

    As I understand it, one of the requirements to receive the “in-state tuition” rate is to self identify as a non-citizen. A NON CITIZEN of the United States. And yet, no enforcement of existing laws is attempted nor contemplated…

    It doesn’t surprise me to see dem controlled State houses/Guvs passing “dream act” legislation, such as Illinois or Washington. It does surprise me when a State governed by “adults” does so.

    Like

Leave a reply to Finley Cancel reply