As I sit here on a Saturday afternoon, watching, as a war brought about by procrastination unfolds in Libya, I’m struck by a sad and chilling thought:
The United States of America has gone from being a World Leader to just another World Follower in two short years. And President Barack Hussein Obama is pleased as punch.
His quest to destroy the idea of American Exceptionalism has brought us to this moment in history.
I wrote the following in my post, North Korea, the UN Human Rights Council, and Glass Houses, published November 23, 2010:
The U.N. Human Rights Council has presented our nation with 228 recommendations from 56 countries urging the U.S. to improve human rights for Native Americans, end the death penalty, eliminate racial disparities, stop torture, ratify key international treaties and more.
The council’s first review of the U.S. rights record took place Nov. 5 as part of the Universal Periodic Review, a mechanism by the U.N. General Assembly in 2006 to review human rights records of all 192 U.N. member states every four years. And the Obama administration, which doesn’t seem to like their own country very much, was more than happy to cooperate.
America joined the U.N. Human Rights Council in 2009, ending a boycott of the hypocritical council by President George W. Bush.
Per heritage.org:
The HRC was created in 2006 to replace the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, a body that had failed to hold governments accountable for violating basic human rights and fundamental freedoms. During negotiations to establish the HRC, many basic reforms and standards to ensure that the council would not simply be a repeat of the commission did not receive sufficient support in the General Assembly. As a result, the HRC has been no better—and in some ways, worse—than the commission it replaced.
Anticipating this outcome, the Bush Administration decided not to seek a seat at the Geneva-based council in 2006. Based on its subsequent disappointing record, the U.S. again declined to seek a seat in 2007 and 2008. The Bush Administration also withheld a portion of the U.S. contribution to the U.N. regular budget (equivalent to the part of the U.S. contribution allocated to the HRC) and distanced itself from the council’s proceedings except in instances of “deep national interest.”
The 30-member U.S. delegation was given an hour to present its report and respond to questions. Eighty-five countries had signed up to try to verbally tear down the United States, but there was time for only 56 to present. The results of the ensuing dog and pony show were compiled in a draft “outcome document” that was adopted by the U.N. Human Rights Council on Nov. 8.
The U.S. will review the recommendations and present a formal response at the March 2011 session of the Human Rights Council.
Both countries and politically-driven Progressive organizations with an axe to grind against America presented a bunch of issues and recommendations involving anything that they could think up to try to harm America’s reputation. They were especially critical of our treatment of indigenous peoples.
Take this garbage for what it’s worth. The Heritage Foundation reports that, during its review:
North Korea asserted that it “comprehensively provides” for fundamental rights and freedoms, including “the right to elect and to be elected, the freedoms of speech, the press, assembly, demonstration and association, the rights to complaints and petitions, work and relaxation, free medical care, education and social security, freedoms to engage in scientific, literary and artistic pursuits, and freedoms of residence and travel.”
These outrageous lies were accepted and approved by the majority of member states in the U.N. Human Rights Council.
The endorsement of the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its full implementation was recommended by several countries, including such paragons of virtue as Mexico, Nicaragua, the Bolivian Republic of Venezuela, Egypt, Sudan, Iran, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea).
One of the countries that passed judgement on America, that I did not list in my blog that day, was the one that Obama has authorized military action against, Libya. They were suspended from the Human Rights Council on March 1st, 2011. From this morning’s post:
…In the face of this injustice, the United States and the international community moved swiftly. (31 days later is swiftly?) Sanctions were put in place by the United States and our allies and partners. The U.N. Security Council imposed further sanctions, an arms embargo, and the specter of international accountability for Qaddafi and those around him.
…Once again, Qaddafi chose to ignore the will of his people and the international community. Instead, he launched a military campaign against his own people.
And yet, in United Nations Human Rights Council Hearings, beginning in May, and concluding in November of 2010, this is one of the nations that United States President Barack Hussein Obama and his administration saw fit to pass judgement on America.
Barack Hussein Obama does not believe in American Exceptionalism and his judgement shows it.
“Barack Hussein Obama does not believe in American Exceptionalism and his judgement shows it.”
This was abundantly clear before the election. Too many people agreed.
LikeLike
All part of the plan…
LikeLike